Hostname: page-component-669899f699-rg895 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-01T13:36:34.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Global Distributive Justice: An Egalitarian Perspective1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Cécile Fabre
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A good deal of political theory over the last fifteen years or so has been shaped by the realization that one cannot, and ought not, consider the distribution of resources within a country in isolation from the distribution of resources between countries. Thus, thinkers such as Charles Beitz and Thomas Pogge advocate extensive global distributive policies; others, such as Charles Jones and David Miller, explicitly reject the view that egalitarian principles of justice should apply globally and claim that national communities have only duties to help other countries be viable economically and meet the basic needs of their members. In the global justice debate, pretty much all parties acknowledge that we have obligations of distributive justice to for-eigners. The question is how strong those obligations are, and in particular whether national boundaries can make any difference to the distribution of resources between members of different countries.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Volume , Volume 31: Global Justice, Global Institutions , 2005 , pp. 139 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

1

This paper was presented, in some form or other, at seminars held in Warwick and Oxford, whose participants I thank for their suggestions. I am particularly grateful to G. A. Cohen, Axel Gosseries, John Charvet, David Held, Hugh LaFollette, David Miller, and Thomas Pogge for their written comments on earlier drafts.

References

Arneson, Richard “Equality and Equality of Opportunity for Welfare.“ Philosophical Studies 56 (1989): 77–93.Google Scholar
Arneson, RichardBarry, Brian “Humanity and Justice in Global Perspective.” In Ethics, Economics and the Law: Nomos XXIV, ed. Pennock, J. R. and Chapman, J. W.New York: New York University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Arneson, Richard “Statism and Nationalism: A Cosmopolitan Critique.” In Global Justice: Nomos, Vol. XLI, ed. Shapiro, I. and Brilmayer, L.New York: New York University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Beitz, Charles. Political Theory and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Caney, Simon “Individuals, Nations and Obligations.” In National Rights, International Obligations, ed. Caney, S.George, D. and Jones, P.Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Cohen, Gerald “On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice.” Ethics 99 (1989): 916-44.Google Scholar
Cohen, Gerald “Expensive Taste Rides Again.” Unpublished.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald “What is Equality? Part One: Equality of Welfare” and “What is Equality? Part Two: Equality of Resources.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (1981): 185-246 and 283–345.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. Sovereign Virtue. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Fabre, Cécile “Global Egalitarianism.” In Forms of Justice, ed. Bell, D. and de-Shalit, A.Lanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefield, 2002.Google Scholar
Fabre, Cécile and Miller, D. “Justice and Culture: A Review of Rawls, Sen, Nussbaum and O'Neill.” Political Studies Review 1 (2003): 4–17.Google Scholar
Held, David “Law of States, Law of Peoples.” Legal Theory 8 (2002): 1–44.Google Scholar
Jones, Charles. Global Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Miller, David. On Nationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Miller, David. Principles of Social Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Miller, David “Justice and Global Inequality.” In Inequality, Globalization, and World Politics, ed. Hurrell, A. and Woods, N.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Miller, David. Citizenship and National Identity. London: Polity Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha and Cohen, J.. For Love of Country: Debating the Limits of Patriotism. Boston: Beacon Press, 1996Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas. Realizing Rawls. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas “An Egalitarian Law of Peoples.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 23 (1994): 195–224.Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas. World Poverty and Human Rights. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2002.Google Scholar
John, Rawls. The law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel. Boundaries and Allegiances: Problems of Justice and Responsibility in Liberal Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya “Equality of What?” In Tanner Lectures on Human Values, ed. McMurrin, S.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Steiner, Hillel. An Essay on Rights. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994.Google Scholar
Steiner, Hillel “Just Taxation and International Distribution.” In Global Justice. ed. Shapiro, I. and Brilmayer, L.New York: New York University Press, 1994, 171-91.Google Scholar