Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T20:09:14.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Unique Case of Cerebellar Choroid Plexus Carcinoma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2020

Le Thanh Dung
Affiliation:
Department of Radiology, Viet Duc Hospital, Ha Noi, Vietnam Department of Radiology, Hanoi Medical University, Ha Noi, Vietnam
Nguyen Minh Duc*
Affiliation:
Department of Radiology, Hanoi Medical University, Ha Noi, Vietnam Department of Radiology, Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital 02, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
*
Correspondence to: Nguyen Minh Duc, Department of Radiology, Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, Address: 2 Duong Quang Trung, Ward 12, District 10, Ho Chi Minh City700000, Vietnam, Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Neuroimaging Highlights
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences Inc.

A 3-year-old male, complaining of 4-month headache and vomiting, was evaluated at Children’s Hospital 2. His medical profile showed no abnormalities. During clinical evaluation, no signs of neurological deficits were identified, and routine blood tests were within normal limits. Brain magnetic resonance imaging, with a contrast agent, revealed the absence of hydrocephalus and supratentorial lesions. A heterogeneous-signal-intensity mass (48 × 41 × 38 mm3), with surrounding edematous parenchyma, was identified in the right cerebellar hemisphere, on the T1-weight image (Figure 1A), T2-weighted image (Figure 1B), and the fluid-attenuated inversion recovery image (FLAIR) (Figure 1C). Hemosiderin deposition was identified inside the mass, from old hemorrhage. The mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for the parenchyma and the solid lesion component were 0.63 and 0.86 × 10−3 mm2/s, respectively (Figure 1D). The relative enhancement (%), peak enhancement, peak relative enhancement (%), time to peak (s), wash-in rate (s−1), wash-out rate (s−1), and area under the curve values of the parenchyma compared with the solid mass component, as calculated from the T1-perfusion map, were 1.76 vs 34.64, 37.21 vs 153.26, 2.21 vs 7.36, 43.68 vs 168.47, 12.25 vs 24.00, 5.98 vs 3.14, and 392.47 vs 3632.18, respectively (Figure 1E and F). The preliminary diagnosis was medulloblastoma, and the patient underwent radical tumor excision. The histopathological assessment of the excised tissues revealed a choroid plexus carcinoma (CPC) (Figure 2A and B). The patient was discharged after 2 weeks and continued to receive adjuvant chemotherapy at a different oncological hospital.

Figure 1: A mass, located in the right cerebellar hemisphere, was heterogeneous signal intensity on the sagittal T1-weighted image (A), axial T2-weighted image (B), and coronal FLAIR image (C). ADC map of the lesion and the normal-appearing parenchyma (D). T1-perfusion map of the normal-appearing parenchyma and the lesion (E). The detailed perfusion parameters of the normal-appearing parenchyma and the lesion (F). Roi, region of interest.

Figure 2: Photomicrographs, showing typical CPE, with nuclear pleomorphism and high mitotic activity, accompanied by some necrotic areas (hematoxylin and eosin staining); original magnification (A) and × 400 (B).

According to the World Health Organization Classification, CPC is a particularly malignant, type III tumor that represents fewer than 1% of all intracranial tumors. CPC originates from the choroid plexus epithelium (CPE) and is most frequently found in the ventricular system, particularly the lateral ventricles (50%) and the fourth ventricle (40%), although less common in the third ventricle (5%). Reference Sun, Oh and Ivan1 CPC can occur in all ages of patients but is commonly diagnosed in children. Reference Sun, Oh and Ivan1 Extraventricular, intraparenchymal CPC is exceedingly rare. To the best of our knowledge, only two prior reports have described an intraparenchymal CPC. Reference Carter, Price, Tucci, Lewis, Mewborne and Singh2,Reference Stevens, Stanton, Nichols and Ellis3 Carter et al. Reference Carter, Price, Tucci, Lewis, Mewborne and Singh2 reported a 6-year-old female patient with an intraparenchymal CPC situated in the left frontal lobe, and Stevens et al. Reference Stevens, Stanton, Nichols and Ellis3 presented a 6-year-old female patient with an intraparenchymal CPC located in the right frontal lobe. Thus, our case represents the third report of an intraparenchymal CPC but may be the first reported case of infratentorial, intraparenchymal CPC. Our case was initially misdiagnosed as medulloblastoma or atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (grade IV), a very common pediatric, malignant tumor of the cerebellum, Reference Stevens, Stanton, Nichols and Ellis3,Reference Duc4 due to the atypical position of the CPC, which was situated in the right cerebellar hemisphere.

Two theories have been suggested to explain CPC development in unusual locations. First, CPC may extend from primitive ectopic CPE within the brain parenchyma, beyond the ventricular system. Second, CPC may develop from migrating CPE that becomes isolated during brain development. Reference Azzam and Timperley5 Because most extraventricular intraparenchymal CPCs are adjacent to the ventricular region, CPC may originate from the proximate CPE, and become separated during development. Reference Carter, Price, Tucci, Lewis, Mewborne and Singh2,Reference Stevens, Stanton, Nichols and Ellis3,Reference Azzam and Timperley5,Reference Greene6

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to Dr. Mai Tan Lien Bang, Dr. Dang Do Thanh Can, Dr. Huynh Quang Huy, Mr. Bilgin Keserci, Mrs. Dang Thi Bich Ngoc and Mr. Nguyen Chanh Thi for their general help and technical support in completing this work.

Statement of Ethics

This study was approved by the Institutional review board of Children’s Hospital 2 (Ref: 352/ND2-CDT). Written informed consent from the patient’s legal guardian was obtained for the publication of this case report and any accompanying images.

Statement of Authorship

LTD and NMD contributed equally to this work as co-first authors.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

Sun, MZ, Oh, MC, Ivan, ME, et al. Current management of choroid plexus carcinomas. Neurosurg Rev. 2014;37(2):179–92.10.1007/s10143-013-0499-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carter, AB, Price, DL Jr, Tucci, KA, Lewis, GK, Mewborne, J, Singh, HK. Choroid plexus carcinoma presenting as an intraparenchymal mass. J Neurosurg. 2001;95(6):1040–44.10.3171/jns.2001.95.6.1040CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, EA, Stanton, CA, Nichols, K, Ellis, TL. Rare intraparenchymal choroid plexus carcinoma resembling atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor diagnosed by immunostaining for INI1 protein. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2009;4(4):368–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duc, NM. The role of diffusion tensor imaging metrics in the discrimination between cerebellar medulloblastoma and brainstem glioma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2020;67:e28468.10.1002/pbc.28468CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Azzam, NI, Timperley, WR. Intracerebral cyst due to ectopic choroid plexus: case report. J Neurosurg. 1981;55(4):651–53.10.3171/jns.1981.55.4.0651CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greene, RC. Extraventricular and intra-cerebellar papilloma of the choroid plexus. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1951;10(2):204207.10.1097/00005072-195104000-00007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1: A mass, located in the right cerebellar hemisphere, was heterogeneous signal intensity on the sagittal T1-weighted image (A), axial T2-weighted image (B), and coronal FLAIR image (C). ADC map of the lesion and the normal-appearing parenchyma (D). T1-perfusion map of the normal-appearing parenchyma and the lesion (E). The detailed perfusion parameters of the normal-appearing parenchyma and the lesion (F). Roi, region of interest.

Figure 1

Figure 2: Photomicrographs, showing typical CPE, with nuclear pleomorphism and high mitotic activity, accompanied by some necrotic areas (hematoxylin and eosin staining); original magnification (A) and × 400 (B).