Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T21:33:07.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Traumatic Brain Injury, Aging and Reaction Time

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

D.T. Stuss ,
L.L. Stethem ,
T.W. Picton ,
E.E. Leech  and
G. Pelchat
D.T. Stuss*
Affiliation:
Schools of Medicine (Neurology) and Psychology, Schools of Medicine (Neurology) and Psychology, University of Ottawa, Human Neurosciences Research Unit, University of Ottawa, Ottawa General Hospital, Ottawa
L.L. Stethem
Affiliation:
Schools of Medicine (Neurology) and Psychology, Schools of Medicine (Neurology) and Psychology, University of Ottawa, Human Neurosciences Research Unit, University of Ottawa, Ottawa General Hospital, Ottawa
T.W. Picton
Affiliation:
Schools of Medicine (Neurology) and Psychology, Schools of Medicine (Neurology) and Psychology, University of Ottawa, Human Neurosciences Research Unit, University of Ottawa, Ottawa General Hospital, Ottawa
E.E. Leech
Affiliation:
Schools of Medicine (Neurology) and Psychology, Schools of Medicine (Neurology) and Psychology, University of Ottawa, Human Neurosciences Research Unit, University of Ottawa, Ottawa General Hospital, Ottawa
G. Pelchat
Affiliation:
Schools of Medicine (Neurology) and Psychology, Schools of Medicine (Neurology) and Psychology, University of Ottawa, Human Neurosciences Research Unit, University of Ottawa, Ottawa General Hospital, Ottawa
*
Rotman Research Institute of Baycrest Centre, 3560 Bathurst St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M6A 2E1
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The effects of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and aging were compared on tests of simple and complex reaction time (RT). Simple RT was not significantly affected by aging or TBI. TBI patients, however, tended to be slower on Simple RT tasks, and had a larger standard deviation. Individuals over age 60 and patients of any age with TBI demonstrated slower RT with choice RT tests. In addition, both groups (those over 60 and TBI patients) were less able than other groups to inhibit the processing of redundant information. For the TBI patients, this occurred primarily on reassessment. These results suggest that the deficit in both aging and TBI is not only a generalized neuronal slowing but a more specific impairment in attentional control processes, exhibited as a deficit in focused attention.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , May 1989 , pp. 161 - 167
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 1989

References

REFERENCES

1.Birren, JE, Woods, AM, Williams, MV. Behavioral slowing with age: Causes, organization, and consequences. In: Poon, LW, ed. Aging in the 1980s: Psychological issues. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association 1980; 293–308.Google Scholar
2.Cerella, J, Poon, LW, Williams, DM. Age and the complexity hypothesis. In: Poon, LW, ed. Aging in the 1980s: Psychological issues. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association 1980; 332–340.Google Scholar
3.Salthouse, TA. Speed of behavior and its implications for cognition. In: Birren, JE, Schaie, KW, eds. Handbook of the psychology of aging. Second edition. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold 1985; 400–426.Google Scholar
4.Benton, AL, Blackburn, HL. Practice effects in reaction time tasks in brain-injured patients. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 1958; 54: 109–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Blackburn, HL, Benton, AL. Simple and choice reaction time in cerebral disease. Confinia Neurologica 1955; 15: 327–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Klensch, H. (1973). Die diagnostische Valenz der Reaktionszeitmessung bei verschiendenen zerebralen Erkrankungen. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 1973; 41: 575–581 (referred in Van Zomeren & Deelman, 1978).Google Scholar
7.Dencker, SJ, Lofving, B. A psychometric study of identical twins discordant for closed head injury. Acta Psychiatr Neurol Scand 1958; 33: 122.Google Scholar
8.MacFlynn, G, Montgomery, EA, Fenton, GW, et al. Measurement of reaction time following minor head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1984; 47: 1326–1331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Miller, E. Simple and choice reaction time following severe head injury. Cortex 1970; 6: 121–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Norrman, B, Svahn, K. A follow-up study of severe brain injuries. Acta Psychiatr Neurol Scand 1961; 37: 236–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Van Zomeren, AH, Deelman, BG. Differential effects of simple and choice reaction after closed head injury. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 1976; 79: 81–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Gronwall, DMA. Paced auditory serial-addition task: A measure of recovery from concussion. Percept Mot Skills 1977; 44: 367–373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Alexander, MP. Traumatic brain injury. In: Benson, DF, Blumer, D, eds. Psychiatric aspects of neurologic disease. New York: Grune & Stratton 1982; 219–249.Google Scholar
14.Stritch, SJ. The pathology of severe head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1956; 19: 163–185.Google Scholar
15.Kemper, T. Neuroanatomical and neuropathological changes in nor-mal aging and in dementia. In: Albert, ML, ed. Clinical neurology of aging. New York: Oxford University Press 1984; 9–52.Google Scholar
16.Kinsbourne, M. Cognitive deficit and the aging brain: A behavioral analysis. Int J Aging Hum Dev 1974; 5: 41–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Clifton, GL, Grossman, RG, Makela, ME, et al. Neurological course and correlated computerized tomography findings after severe closed head injury. J Neurosurg 1980; 52: 61–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Courville, CB. Pathology of the central nervous system. Mountain View, CA: Pacific Press, 1937.Google Scholar
19.Levin, HS, Mattis, S, Ruff, RM, et al. Neurobehavioral outcome fol-lowing minor head injury: a three-center study. J Neurosurg 1987; 66: 234–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Stuss, DT. Contribution of frontal lobe injury to cognitive impair-ment after closed head injury: Methods of assessment and recent findings. In: Levin, HS, Grafman, J, Eisenberg, HM, eds. Neurobehavioral recovery from head injury. New York: Oxford University Press 1987; 166–177.Google Scholar
21.Albert, MS, Kaplan, EF. Organic implications of neuropsychological deficits in the elderly. In: Poon, LW, Fozard, J, Cermak, L, Arenberg, D, Thompson, LW, eds. New directions in memory and aging. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum 1980; 403–432.Google Scholar
22.Cummings, JL, Benson, DF. Dementia: A clinical approach. Boston: Butterworth 1983.Google Scholar
23.Moscovitch, M, Winocur, G. Contextual cues and release from proactive inhibition in young and old people. Can J Psychol 1983; 37: 331–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Dupui, Ph, Guell, A, Bessoles, G, et al. Cerebral blood flow in aging: Decrease of hyperfrontal distribution. In: Cohen, MM, ed. Monographs in neural sciences. Basel: Karger 1984; 131–138.Google Scholar
25.Duara, R, Grady, C, Haxby, J, et al. Human brain glucose utilization and cognitive function in relation to age. Ann Neurol 1984; 16: 702–713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Luria, AR. The working brain. An introduction to neuropsychology, translated by Haigh, B.. New York: Basic Books 1973.Google Scholar
27.Ommaya, AK, Gennarelli, TA. Cerebral concussion and traumatic unconsciousness. Correlation of experimental and clinical observations on blunt head injuries. Brain 1974; 97: 633–654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.Grubbs, FE. Procedures for detecting outlying observations in samples. Technometrics 1969; 11: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Welford, AT. Motor performance. In: Birren, JE, Schaie, KW, eds. Handbook of the psychology of aging. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold 1977; 450–496.Google Scholar
30.Welford, AT. Sensory, perceptual, and motor processes in older adults. In: Birren, JE, Sloane, RB, eds. Handbook of mental health and aging. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall 1980; 192–213.Google Scholar
31.Van Zomeren, AH. Reaction time and attention after closed head injury. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger 1981.Google Scholar
32.Anders, TR, Fozard, JL. Effects of age upon retrieval from primary and secondary memory. Devel Psychol 1973; 9: 411–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Cohen, G, Faulkner, D. Age differences in performance on two information-processing tasks: Strategy selection and processing efficiency. J Gerontol 1983; 38: 447–454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34.Gaylord, SA, Marsh, GR. Age differences in the speed of a spatial cognitive process. J Gerontol 1975; 30: 674–678.Google ScholarPubMed
35.Rabbitt, P. Changes in problem solving ability in old age. In: Birren, JE, Schaie, KW, eds. Handbook of the psychology of aging. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold 1977; 606–625.Google Scholar
36.Griew, S. Uncertainty as a determinant of performance in relation to age. Gerontologia 1958; 2: 284–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37.Rabbitt, PMA. An age-decrement in the ability to ignore irrelevant information. J Gerontol 1965; 20: 233–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38.Madden, DJ. Aging and distraction by highly familiar stimuli dur-ing visual search. Dev Psychol 1983; 19: 499–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39.Wright, LL, Elias, JW. Age differences in the effects of perceptual noise. J Gerontol 1979; 34: 704–708.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40.Chown, SM. Age and the rigidities. J Gerontol 1961; 16: 353–362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41.Mistler-Lachman, JL. Spontaneous shift in encoding dimensions among elderly subjects. J Gerontol 1977; 32: 68–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42.Schaie, KW. Intelligence and problem-solving. In: Birren, JE, Sloane, RB, eds. Handbook of mental health and aging. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall 1980; 262–284.Google Scholar
43.Wetherick, NE. Changing an established concept: A comparison of the ability of young, middle-aged and old subjects. Gerontologia 1965; 77: 89–95.Google Scholar
44.Howell, SC. Age, familiarity and complexity as recognition vari-ables. Percept Mot Skills 1972; 34: 732–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45.Rabbitt, PMA. Age and the use of structure in transmitted informa-tion. In: Talland, GA, ed. Human aging and behavior: Recent advances in research and theory. New York: Academic Press 1968; 75–92.Google Scholar
46.Klayman, J, Ha, Y-W. Confirmation, disconfirmation, and informa-tion in hypothesis testing. Psychol Rev 1987; 94: 211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47.Chadwick, O, Rutter, M, Brown, G, et al. A prospective study of children with head injuries: II. Cognitive sequelae. Psychol Med 1981; 11: 49–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48.Stuss, DT, Ely, P, Hugenholtz, H, et al. Subtle neuropsychological deficits in patients with good recovery after closed head injury. Neurosurgery 1985; 17: 41–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49.Van Zomeren, AH, Brouwer, WH. Head injury and concepts of attention. In: Levin, HS, Grafman, J, Eisenberg, HM, eds. Neurobehavioral recovery from head injury. New York: Oxford University Press 1987; 398–415.Google Scholar
50.Van Zomeren, AH, Brouwer, WH, Deelman, BG. Attentional deficits: The riddles of selectivity, speed, and alertness. In: Brooks, N, ed. Closed head injury: Psychological, social and family consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1984;: 74–107.Google Scholar
51.Treisman, AM, Gelade, G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychol 1980; 12: 97–136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
52.Fuster, JM. The prefrontal cortex. Anatomy, physiology, and neu-ropsychology of the frontal lobe. New York: Raven Press 1980.Google Scholar
53.Luria, AR. Higher cortical functions in man, translated by Haigh, B. New York: Basic Books, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54.Stuss, DT, Benson, DF. Neuropsychological studies of the frontal lobes. Psychol Bull 1984; 95: 3–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
55.Stuss, DT, Benson, DF. The frontal lobes. New York: Raven Press 1986.Google Scholar
56.Van Zomeren, AH, Deelman, BG. Long-term recovery of visual reaction time after closed head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1978; 41: 452–457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed