Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:25:00.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reliability of the MMSE Administered In-Person and by Telehealth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2014

Wendaline McEachern ,
Andrew Kirk ,
Debra G. Morgan ,
Margaret Crossley  and
Carol Henry
Wendaline McEachern
Affiliation:
College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Andrew Kirk*
Affiliation:
Division of Neurology, Aging Research & Memory Clinic, University of Saskatchewan
Debra G. Morgan
Affiliation:
Institute of Agriculture Rural & Environmental Health, Aging Research & Memory Clinic, University of Saskatchewan
Margaret Crossley
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Department of Psychology, Aging Research & Memory Clinic, University of Saskatchewan
Carol Henry
Affiliation:
Telehealth Department, Saskatoon Health Region, Saskatoon
*
Division of Neurology, Royal University Hospital, 103 Hospital Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0W8, Canada.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background:

Recent advances in telehealth have improved access to health care for those in rural areas. It is important that examinations conducted via telehealth are comparable to in-person testing. A rural and remote memory clinic in Saskatoon provided an opportunity to compare scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) administered in-person and via telehealth.

Methods:

After an initial one day assessment in Saskatoon, patients were seen in follow-up at 6 and 12 weeks. Individual patients were randomly assigned to either in-person follow-up assessment in Saskatoon or telehealth assessment in their home community. Patients who initially received in-person assessments were seen by telehealth for their next follow-up visit and vice-versa. The same neurologist administered MMSEs at all visits. The first 71 patients with both 6 and 12 week follow-up assessments were included in this study. The scores of in-person and telehealth MMSE administrations were compared using the methods of Bland and Altman as well as a paired t-test.

Results:

MMSE scores did not differ significantly between telehealth (22.34 +/- 6.35) and in-person (22.70 +/- 6.51) assessments.

Conclusion:

Telehealth provides an acceptable means of assessing mental status of patients in remote areas.

Résumé:

RÉSUMÉ:Contexte:

Les progrès récents de la télésanté ont amélioré l'accès aux soins de santé par les habitants des régions rurales. Il est important que les examens effectués via télésanté soient comparables à ceux effectués en personne. Une clinique de la mémoire dans une région rurale éloignée à Saskatoon a fourni l'occasion de comparer les scores du Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) administré en personne et via télésanté.

Méthodes:

Suite à une évaluation initiale d'une journée à Saskatoon, les patients ont été réévalués 6 et 12 semaines plus tard. Les patients ont été assignés au hasard soit à une évaluation de suivi en personne à Saskatoon ou à une évaluation via télésanté dans leur lieu de résidence. Les patients qui ont reçu initialement des évaluations en personne ont été vus par télésanté à leur visite de suivi subséquente et vice-versa. Le même neurologue administrait le MMSE à toutes les visites. Les premiers 71 patients qui ont eu une évaluation de suivi après 6 et 12 semaines ont été inclus dans cette étude. Les scores au MMSE obtenus en personne et via télésanté ont été comparés au moyen des méthodes de Bland et Altman ainsi que par test de t apparié.

Résultats:

Les scores du MMSE n'étaient pas significativement différents entre les évaluations via télésanté (22,34 ± 6,35) et en personne (22,70 ± 6,51).

Conclusion:

La télésanté est un moyen acceptable d'évaluer l'état mental de patients résidant dans des régions éloignées.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 35 , Issue 5 , November 2008 , pp. 643 - 646
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2008

References

1. Jennett, PA, Scott, RE, Affleck Hall, L, Hailey, D, Ohinmaa, A, Anderson, C, et al. Policy implications associated with the socioeconomic and health system impact of telehealth: a case study from Canada. The experience in Alberta, Canada. Telemed J E Health, Special Canadian Issue. Spring 2004; 10(1):77–85.Google Scholar
2. Statistics, Canada. Portrait of the Canadian population in 2006, by Age and Sex [Internet]. Ottawa, Canada: Statistics Canada; 2007 July 17 [2006 Census; [cited 2007 July 24]. Available from: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/census06/analysis/agesex/index.cfmGoogle Scholar
3. Sclater, K, Alagiakrishnan, K, Sclater, A. An investigation of videoconferenced geriatric medicine grand rounds in Alberta. J Telemed Telecare. 2004; 10(2):104–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Poon, P, Hui, E, Dai, D, Kwok, T, Woo, J. Cognitive intervention for community-dwelling older persons with memory problems: telemedicine versus face-to-face treatment. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005; Mar 20(3):285–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. McBain, L, Morgan, D. Telehealth, geography, and jurisdiction: issues of healthcare delivery in Northern Saskatchewan. Canadian Woman Studies. 2006; 24(4):123–9.Google Scholar
6. Montani, C, Billaud, N, Couturier, P, Fluchaire, I, Lemaire, R, Malterre, C, et al. "Telepsychometry": a remote psychometry consultation in clinical gerontology: preliminary study. Telemed J. 1996; 2(2):145–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Montani, C, Billaud, N, Tyrrell, J, Fluchaire, I, Malterre, C, Lauvernay, N, et al. Psychological impact of a remote psychometric consultation with hospitalized elderly people. J Telemed Telecare. 1997; 3(3):140–5.Google Scholar
8. Ball, C, Tyrrell, J, Long, C. Scoring written material from the minimental state examination: a comparison of face-to-face, fax and video-linked scoring. J Telemed Telecare. 1999; 5(4):253–6.Google Scholar
9. Loh, PK, Ramesh, P, Maher, S, Saligari, J, Flicker, L, Goldswain, P. Can patients with dementia be assessed at a distance? the use of telehealth and standardised assessments. Intern Med J. 2004; May 34(5):239–42.Google Scholar
10. Morgan, D, Stewart, N, Crossley, M, D’Arcy, C, Biem, J, Kirk, A, et al. Dementia care in rural and remote areas: the first year of a CIHR new emerging team. CJNR. 2005; 37(1):177–82.Google Scholar
11. Morgan, D, Crossley, M, Kirk, A, D’Arcy Stewart, N, Biem, J, et al. Improving access to dementia care: development and evaluation of a rural and remote memory clinic. Aging and Mental Health. [In press] March 2008.Google Scholar
12. Folstein, MF, Folstein, SE, McHugh, PR. Mini-mental state: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975; Nov 12(3):189–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Bland, JM, Altman, DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; Feb 8 1(8476):307–10.Google Scholar
14. Bowie, P, Branton, T, Holmes, J. Should the Mini Mental State Examination be used to monitor dementia treatments? Lancet. 1999; Oct 30 354(9189):1527–8.Google Scholar
15. Ball, CJ, Scott, N, McLaren, PM, Watson, JP. Preliminary evaluation of a low-cost VideoConferencing (LCVC) system for remote cognitive testing of adult psychiatric patients. Br J Clin Psychol. 1993; Sept32(3):303–7.Google Scholar
16. Montani, C, Klientovsky, K, Tyrrell, J, Ploton, L, Couturier, P, Franco, A. Feasibility of psychological consultation with elderly demented patients. J Telemed Telecare. 1998; 4 Suppl 1:111.Google Scholar
17. Lyketsos, CG, Roques, C, Hovanec, L, Jones, BN 3rd. Telemedicine use and the reduction of psychiatric admissions from a long-term care facility. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2001; 14(2):76–9.Google Scholar
18. Shores, MM, Ryan-Dykes, P, Williams, RM, Mamerto, B, Sadak, T, Pascualy, M, et al. Identifying undiagnosed dementia in residential care veterans: comparing telemedicine to in-person clinical examination. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2004; Feb 19(2):101–8.Google Scholar
19. Raskind, MA, Peskind, ER, Wessel, T, Yuan, W. Galantamine in AD: a six-month randomized, placebo-controlled trial with a six-month extension. the galantamine USA-1 study group. Neurology. 2000; Jun 27 54(12):2261–8.Google Scholar
20. Doody, RS, Geldmacher, DS, Gordon, B, Perdomo, CA, Pratt, RD, Donepezil Study, G. Open-label, multicenter, phase 3 extension study of the safety and efficacy of donepezil in patients with alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2001; Mar 58(3):427–33.Google Scholar
21. Lawrence, J, Davidoff, D, Katt-Lloyd, D, Auerbach, M, Hennen, J. A pilot program of improved methods for community-based screening for dementia. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2001; 9(3):205–11.Google Scholar