Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:12:19.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Recessive ataxia in Acadians and “Cajuns”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

M.A. Wilensky
Affiliation:
Clinical Research Institute of Montreal and Tulane University, New Orleans, LA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The physician exposed to a large number of patients with a recessive form of ataxia, will occasionally observe slower progression forms which lack many of the severe features or cardinal symptoms of Friedreich's disease. We have studied 31 such cases in Acadians of the Maritime Provinces of Canada, and in their separated “cousins” from Louisiana, now called “Cajuns”. These patients are compared to a consecutive series of 22 Friedreich's disease cases in French Canada.

It is shown that the age of onset is slightly later, but the progression much slower and the age at death older in the Acadian patients. These cases develop signs of pyramidal and posterior column involvement gradually and later than the classical Friedreich. As a result, pes cavus and scoliosis are less marked, as well as muscle weakness and cardiomyopathy. On the other hand, the rate of progression of areflexic ataxia, the “core disease”, is identical in both groups. The main difference in progression rates of the disorders occurs after 10-12 years of evolution, thus after the period of hormono-ponderal growth.

These differences, coupled to the diverging genetic and genealogical backgrounds, are sufficiently large for the presumption of distinct disorders. Whether they are due to allelic mutations, linked but different genes, genes affecting the same metabolic pathway, but elsewhere or to completely distinct entities, will have to be left to further studies, but their existence in completely different populations and milieux is worthy of report.

Type
A—Clinical Studies
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 1984

References

Allard, P, Dansereau, J.Thiry, PS, Geoffroy, G, Raso, JV, Duhaime, M (1982) Scoliosis in Friedreich’s Ataxia. Can J Neurol Sci 9: 105111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arsenault, B (1978) Histoire et g6n6alogie des Acadiens. In: Histoire des Acadiens, vol 1 Lemeac, Montreal, pp 1–389.Google Scholar
Barbeau, A (1980) Distribution of ataxia in Quebec. In: Spinocerebellar Degeneration Sobue, I. (ed) Tokyo University Press, pp 120142.Google Scholar
Barbeau, A (1982) Friedreich’s Disease 1982: Etiologic hypotheses: A personal analysis. Can J Neurol Sci 9: 243263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bouchard, JP, Barbeau, A, Bouchard, R, Paquet, M, Bouchard, RW (1979) A cluster of Friedreich’s ataxia in Rimouski, Quebec Can J Neurol:Sci 6: 205208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, JR (1970) Ataxic dysarthria. Int J Neurol 7: 302318.Google Scholar
Cote, M, Davignon, A, Pecko-Drouin, K, Solignac, A, Geoffroy, G, Lemieux, B, Barbeau, A (1976) Cardiological signs and symptoms in Friedreich’s ataxia. Can J Neurol Sci 3: 319322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geoffroy, G, Barbeau, A, Breton, G, Lemieux, B, Aube, M, Leger, C, Bouchard, JP (1976) Clinical description and roentgenologic evaluation of patients with Friedreich’s ataxia. Can J Neurol Sci 3: 279286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harding, AE (1981) Early onset cerebellar ataxia with retained tendon reflexes: a clinical and genetic study of a disorder distinct from Friedreich’s ataxia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 44: 503508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pourcher, E, Barbeau, A (1980) Field testing of an ataxia scoring and staging system. Can J Neurol Sci 7: 339344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed