Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T16:57:51.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Primary or Secondary Decompressive Craniectomy: Different Indication and Outcome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2014

Ahmed Al-Jishi
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Hospital, McGill University Health Centre
Rajeet Singh Saluja
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Hospital, McGill University Health Centre
Hosam Al-Jehani
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Hospital, McGill University Health Centre Department of Neurosurgery, King Fahad University Hospital, Dammam University, Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia
Julie Lamoureux
Affiliation:
Médicine sociale de préventive, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
Mohammad Maleki
Affiliation:
Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre
Judith Marcoux*
Affiliation:
Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre
*
Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, 1650 Cedar Ave, Room L7-524, Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1A4, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background:

Intracranial hypertension can cause secondary damage after a traumatic brain injury. Aggressive medical management might not be sufficient to alleviate the increasing intracranial pressure (ICP), and decompressive craniectomy (DC) can be considered. Decompressive craniectomy can be divided into categories, according to the timing and rationale for performing the procedure: primary (done at the time of mass lesion evacuation) and secondary craniectomy (done to treat refractory ICP). Most studies analyze primary and secondary DC together. Our hypothesis is that these two groups are distinct and the aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the differences in order to better predict outcome after DC.

Methods:

Seventy patients had DC over a period of four years at our center. They were divided into two groups based on the timing of the DC. Primary DC (44 patients) was done within 24 hours of the injury for mass lesion evacuation. Secondary DC (26 patients) was done after 24 hours and purely for the treatment of refractory ICP. Pre-op characteristics and post-op outcomes were compared between the two groups.

Results:

There was a significant difference in the mechanism of injury, the pupil abnormalities and Marshall grade between primary and secondary DC. There was also a significant difference in outcome with primary DC showing 45.5% good outcome and 40.9% mortality and secondary DC showing 73.1% good outcome and 15.4% mortality.

Conclusions:

Primary and secondary DC have different indications and patients characteristics. Outcome prediction following DC should be adjusted according to the surgical indication.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2011

References

1.Marmarou, A, Anderson, RL, Ward, JD, et al.Impact of ICP instability and hypotension on outcome in patients with severe head trauma. J Neurosurg. 1991;75:S596.Google Scholar
2.Young, JS, Blow, O, Turrentine, F, Claridge, JA, Schulman, A.Is there an upper limit of intracranial pressure in patients with severe head injury if cerebral perfusion pressure is maintained? Neurosurg Focus. 2003;15:E2.Google Scholar
3.Balestreri, M, Czosnyka, M, Hutchinson, P, et al.Impact of intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure on severe disability and mortality after head injury. Neurocrit Care. 2006;4:813.Google Scholar
4.Grinkeviciūte, DE, Kevalas, R, Matukevicius, A, Ragaisis, V, Tamasauskas, A.Significance of intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure in severe pediatric traumatic brain injury. Medicina (Kaunas). 2008;44:119–25.Google Scholar
5.Murr, R, Stummer, W, Schürer, L, Polasek, J.Cerebral lactate production in relation to intracranial pressure, cranial computed tomography findings, and outcome in patients with severe head injury. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1996;138:928–36.Google Scholar
6.Kunze, E, Meixensberger, J, Janka, M, Sörensen, N, Roosen, K.Decompressive craniectomy in patients with uncontrollable intracranial hypertension. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 1998;71:16–8.Google Scholar
7.Schneider, GH, Bardt, T, Lanksch, WR, Unterberg, A.Decompressive craniectomy following traumatic brain injury: ICP, CPP and neurological outcome. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2002;81:77–9.Google Scholar
8.Albanèse, J, Leone, M, Alliez, JR, et al.Decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury: Evaluation of the effects at one year. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:2535–8.Google Scholar
9.Aarabi, B, Hesdorffer, DC, Ahn, ES, Aresco, C, Scalea, TM, Eisenberg, HM.Outcome following decompressive craniectomy for malignant swelling due to severe head injury. J Neurosurg. 2006; 104:469–79.Google Scholar
10.Chibbaro, S, Tacconi, L.Role of decompressive craniectomy in the management of severe head injury with refractory cerebral edema and intractable intracranial pressure. Our experience with 48 cases. Surg Neurol. 2007;68:632–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Bao, YH, Liang, YM, Gao, GY, Pan, YH, Luo, QZ, Jiang, JY.Bilateral decompressive craniectomy for patients with malignant diffuse brain swelling after severe traumatic brain injury: a 37-case study. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27:341–7.Google Scholar
12.Taylor, A, Butt, W, Rosenfeld, J, et al.A randomized trial of very early decompressive craniectomy in children with traumatic brain injury and sustained intracranial hypertension. Childs Nerv Syst. 2001;17:154–62.Google Scholar
13.Hutchinson, PJ, Corteen, E, Czosnyka, M, et al. Decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injury: the randomized multicenter RESCUEicp study (www.RESCUEicp.com). Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2006;96:1720. http://www.RESCUEicp.comGoogle Scholar
14.Cooper, DJ, Rosenfeld, JV, Murray, L, et al.Early decompressive craniectomy for patients with severe traumatic brain injury and refractory intracranial hypertension-a pilot randomized trial. J Crit Care. 2008;23:387–93.Google Scholar
15.Sahuquillo, J.Decompressive craniectomy for the treatment of refractory high intracranial pressure in traumatic brain injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; Issue 4.Google Scholar
16.Guerra, KW, Piek, J, Gaab, MR.Decompressive craniectomy to treat intracranial hypertension in head injury patients. Intensive Care Med. 1999a;25:1327–9.Google Scholar
17.Guerra, WK, Gaab, MR, Dietz, H, Mueller, JU, Piek, J, Fritsch, MJ.Surgical decompression for traumatic brain swelling: indications and results. J Neurosurg. 1999 Feb;90(2):187–96.Google Scholar
18.Münch, E, Horn, P, Schürer, L, Piepgras, A, Paul, T, Schmiedek, P.Management of severe traumatic brain injury by decompressive craniectomy. Neurosurgery. 2000;47:315–22.Google Scholar
19.Jiang, JY, Xu, W, Li, WP, et al.Efficacy of standard trauma craniectomy for refractory intracranial hypertension with severe traumatic brain injury: a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled study. J Neurotrauma. 2005;22:623–8.Google Scholar
20.Meier, U, Gräwe, A, König, A.The importance of major extracranial injuries by the decompressive craniectomy in severe head injuries. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2005;95:55–7.Google Scholar
21.Ucar, T, Akyuz, M, Kazan, S, Tuncer, R.Role of decompressive surgery in the management of severe head injuries: prognostic factors and patient selection. J Neurotrauma. 2005;2:1311–8.Google Scholar
22.Pompucci, A, De Bonis, P, Pettorini, B, Petrella, G, Di Chirico, A, Anile, C.Decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury: patient age and outcome. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24:1182–8.Google Scholar
23.Faleiro, RM, Faleiro, LC, Caetano, E, et al.Decompressive craniotomy: prognostic factors and complications in 89 patients. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2008;66:369–73.Google Scholar
24.Howard, JL, Cipolle, MD, Anderson, M, et al.Outcome after decompressive craniectomy for the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma. 2008;65:380–5.Google Scholar
25.Morgalla, MH, Will, BE, Roser, F, Tatagiba, M.Do long-term results justify decompressive craniectomy after severe traumatic brain injury? J Neurosurgery. 2008;109:685–90.Google Scholar
26.Yang, XF, Wen, L, Shen, F, et al.Surgical complications secondary to decompressive craniectomy in patients with a head injury: a series of 108 consecutive cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2008; 150:1241–7.Google Scholar
27.Rubiano, AM, Villarreal, W, Hakim, EJ, et al.Early decompressive craniectomy for neurotrauma: an institutional experience. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2009;15:2838.Google Scholar
28.Williams, RF, Magnotti, LJ, Croce, MA, et al.Impact of decompressive craniectomy on functional outcome after severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma. 2009;66:1570–4.Google Scholar
29.Teasdale, G, Jennett, B.Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: a practical scale. Lancet. 1974;13:81–4.Google Scholar
30.Bratton, SL, Chestnut, RM, Ghajar, J, et al.Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. VI. Indications for intracranial pressure monitoring. Brain Trauma Foundation; American Association of Neurological Surgeons; Congress of Neurological Surgeons; Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care. J Neurotrauma. 2007; 24:S3744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31.Baker, SP, O’Neill, B, Haddon, W Jr, Long, WB.The Injury Severity Score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma. 1974;14: 187–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32.Marshall, LF, Eisenberg, HM, Jane, JA.A new classification of head injury based on computerized tomography. J. Neurosurg. 1991; 75:S1420.Google Scholar
33.Marshall, LF, Marshall, SB, Klauber, MR, et al.The diagnosis of head injury requires a classification based on computed axial tomography. J Neurotrauma. 1992;9:S28792.Google Scholar
34.Jennett, B, Bond, M. (1975). Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage: a practical scale. Lancet. 1975;1:480–4.Google Scholar
35.Jennett, B, Snoek, J, Bond, MR.Disability after severe head injury: observations on the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J. Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1981;44:285–93.Google Scholar
36.Polin, RS, Shaffrey, ME, Bogaev, CA, et al.Decompressive bifrontal craniectomy in the treatment of severe refractory posttraumatic cerebral edema. Neurosurgery. 1997;41:8492.Google Scholar
37.Olivecrona, M, Rodling-Wahlström, M, Naredi, S, Koskinen, LO.Effective ICP reduction by decompressive craniectomy in patients with severe traumatic brain injury treated by an ICP-targeted therapy. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24:927–35.Google Scholar
38.Li, G, Wen, L, Yang, XF, Zheng, XJ, Zhan, RY, Liu, WG.Efficacy of large decompressive craniectomy in severe traumatic brain injury. Chin J Traumatol. 2008;11:253–6.Google Scholar
39.Kan, P, Amini, A, Hansen, K, et al.Outcomes after decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury in children. J Neurosurg. 2006;105(Suppl):337–42.Google Scholar
40.Wagner, S, Schnippering, H, Aschoff, A, Koziol, JA, Schwab, S, Steiner, T.Suboptimum hemicraniectomy as a cause of additional cerebral lesions in patients with malignant infarction of the middle cerebral artery. J Neurosurg. 2002;94:693–6.Google Scholar
41.De Luca, GP, Volpin, L, Fornezza, U, et al.The role of decompressive craniectomy in the treatment of uncontrollable post-traumatic intracranial hypertension. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2000;76:401–4.Google Scholar
42.Coplin, WM, Cullen, NK, Policherla, PN, et al.Safety and feasibility of craniectomy with duraplasty as the initial surgical intervention for severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma. 2001;50:1050–9.Google Scholar
43.Csokay, A, Pataki, G, Nagy, L, Belán, K.Vascular tunnel construction in the treatment of severe brain swelling caused by trauma and SAH. (evidence based on intra-operative blood flow measure). Neurol Res. 2002; 24:157–60.Google Scholar
44.Kontopoulos, V, Foroglou, N, Patsalas, J, et al.Decompressive craniectomy for the management of patiens with refractory hypertension: should it be reconsidered? Acta Neurochir. 2002;144:791–6.Google Scholar
45.Meier, U, König, A, Gräwe, A.The importance of major extracranial injuries by the decompressive craniectomy in severe head injuries. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2005;95:55–7.Google Scholar
46.Faleiro, RM, Pimenta, NJ, Faleiro, LC, Cordeiro, AF, Maciel, CJ, Gusmão, SN.[Decompressive craniotomy for the early treatment of traumatic intracranial hypertension.]. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2005;63:508–13.Google Scholar
47.Skoglund, TS, Eriksson-Ritzén, C, Jensen, C, Rydenhag, B.Aspects on decompressive craniectomy in patients with traumatic head injuries. J Neurotrauma. 2006;23:1502–9.Google Scholar
48.Jagannathan, J, Okonkwo, DO, Dumont, AS, et al.Outcome following decompressive craniectomy in children with severe traumatic brain injury: a 10-year single-center experience with long-term follow up. J Neurosurg. 2007;106(Suppl):268–75.Google Scholar
49.Ho, CL, Wang, CM, Lee, KK, Ng, I, Ang, BT.Cerebral oxygenation, vascular reactivity, and neurochemistry following decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2008;108:943–9.Google Scholar
50.Timofeev, I, Czosnyka, M, Nortje, J, et al.Effect of decompressive craniectomy on intracranial pressure and cerebrospinal compensation following traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2008;108:6673.Google Scholar
51.Figaji, AA, Fieggen, AG, Argent, AC, Le Roux, PD, Peter, JC.Intracranial pressure and cerebral oxygenation changes after decompressive craniectomy in children with severe traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2008;102:7780.Google Scholar
52.Qiu, W, Guo, C, Shen, H, et al.Effects of unilateral decompressive craniectomy on patients with unilateral acute post-traumatic brain swelling after severe traumatic brain injury. Crit Care. 2009;13:R185.Google Scholar
53.Daboussi, A, Minville, VLeclerc-Foucras, S, et al.Cerebral hemodynamic changes in severe head injury patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2009;21:339–45.Google Scholar