Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:26:45.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Patients Referred for TIA May Still Have Persisting Neurological Deficits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2014

Francois Moreau ,
Thomas Jeerakathil ,
Shelagh B. Coutts  and
FRCPC for the ASPIRE investigators
Francois Moreau
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary
Thomas Jeerakathil
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Shelagh B. Coutts*
Affiliation:
Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary Department of Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary
*
Foothills Hospital, C1261, 1403 29th St NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 2T9, Canada.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background:

The presence of residual neurological deficits after neurological symptoms is important information for making a diagnosis of Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) versus stroke. The purpose of this study was to establish the reliability of the referring physician (non neurologist) to report focal neurological deficits in the context of an urgent referral for TIA.

Methods:

Prospectively recorded urgent physician-to-physician phone referrals for TIA through the Southern Alberta TIA hotline from March 2009 to July 2010 were reviewed. “Has the neurological deficit completely resolved?” was asked to the referring physician (family or emergency room physician) and recorded prospectively as a yes/no response. Patients were included if a neurological examination was performed by a neurologist on the same day as referral. The neurologist's assessment of whether the deficit had resolved was compared to that of the referring physician.

Results:

78 patients were included in this study. 62 patients had resolved as per the referring physician's assessment. Of these 62 patients, 16 (25.8% 95%CI 16-38) had evidence of persisting neurological deficits on the neurologist's assessment. A wide variety of mild neurological deficits were identified. None of these deficits appeared to be explained by progression of symptoms.

Conclusion:

Physicians referring patients with TIA syndromes for emergent assessment do not reliably detect mild residual deficits in one-quarter of patients. We are questioning the validity of neurological deficit resolution as a triage rule. The findings suggest that studies of TIA likely include a proportion of minor stroke patients and this should be remembered when extrapolating the results to other populations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , March 2012 , pp. 170 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2012

References

1A CLASSIFICATION and outline of cerebrovascular diseases. Neurology. 1958; 8(5):395–434.Google Scholar
2Albers, GW, Caplan, LR, Easton, JD, et al.Transient ischemic attack-proposal for a new definition. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(21): 1713–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Pendlebury, ST, Rothwell, PM.Risk of recurrent stroke, other vascular events and dementia after transient ischaemic attack and stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;27 Suppl 3:1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Chandratheva, A, Mehta, Z, Geraghty, OC, Marquardt, L, Rothwell, PM.Population-based study of risk and predictors of stroke in the first few hours after a TIA. Neurology. 2009;72(22):1941–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Rothwell, PM, Giles, MF, Chandratheva, A, et al.Effect of urgent treatment of transient ischaemic attack and minor stroke on early recurrent stroke (EXPRESS study): a prospective population-based sequential comparison. Lancet. 2007;370(9596):1432–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Coutts, S, Hill, MD, Demchuk, AM, Goyal, M, Modi, J, Patel SK for the CATCH study group. Early CT/CTA predicts recurrent events in minor stroke/TIA patients: Main results of the CT And MRI in the Triage of TIA and minor Cerebrovascular events to identify High risk patients (CATCH) study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011; 31 (Suppl 2).Google Scholar
7Coutts, SB, Hill, MD, Campos, CR, et al.Recurrent events in transient ischemic attack and minor stroke: what events are happening and to which patients? Stroke. 2008;39(9):2461–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Kraaijeveld, CL, van Gijn, J, Schouten, HJ, Staal, A.Interobserver agreement for the diagnosis of transient ischemic attacks. Stroke. 1984;15(4):723–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Tomasello, F, Mariani, F, Fieschi, C, et al.Assessment of inter-observer differences in the Italian multicenter study on reversible cerebral ischemia. Stroke. 1982;13(1):32–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Castle, J, Mlynash, M, Lee, K, et al.Agreement regarding diagnosis of transient ischemic attack fairly low among stroke-trained neurologists. Stroke. 2010;41(7):1367–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Alberta Provincial Stroke Strategy website. Emergency management of acute stroke [updated January 2010; cited 2011 September 9th]. Available from: http://www.strokestrategy.ab.ca/pillar-recommendations.htmlGoogle Scholar
12Johnston, SC, Rothwell, PM, Nguyen-Huynh, MN, et al.Validation and refinement of scores to predict very early stroke risk after transient ischaemic attack. Lancet. 2007;369(9558):283–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Hill, MD, Yiannakoulias, N, Jeerakathil, T, Tu, JV, Svenson, LW, Schopflocher, DP.The high risk of stroke immediately after transient ischemic attack: a population-based study. Neurology. 2004;62(11):2015–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Johnston, SC, Gress, DR, Browner, WS, Sidney, S.Short-term prognosis after emergency department diagnosis of TIA. JAMA. 2000;284(22):2901–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed