Background: The competency-based medical education (CBME) model has been recently implemented in spinal neurosurgical and orthopedic residencies. This model is grounded on entrustable professional activities (EPAs) that allow the assessment of clinical milestones. Integrating quantitative metrics to evaluate procedural competencies could refine the assessment’s scope. This survey, administered to program directors (PDs), aims to evaluate the current state and anticipated needs for quantitative evaluation to develop innovative assessment techniques. Methods: We surveyed 32 PDs of neurosurgical (N=14) and orthopedics (N=16) programs with a spine service via RedCap. We collected information on the programs’ characteristics. We inquired about existing assessment methods and the perceived values of developing quantitative metrics to assess spinal technical competencies using thirteen questions. Results: The response rate was 53%. All programs use EPAs to assess procedural competencies through direct observation in the operation room. One surgical program employed quantitative metrics for examination. Four PD valued the profitability of quantitative evaluation methods in a clinical or simulatory context. Conclusions: The use of quantitative metrics to assess spinal surgical competencies in Canadian neurosurgical and orthopedic residency programs is seldom. Despite its underutilization, PDs acknowledge the potential for quantitation to improve the accuracy and reliability of CBME assessments in both simulated and clinical settings.