Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-22T16:51:31.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Urgent Need for Successful Randomized Controlled Trials in Neurosciences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2014

Samuel Wiebe  and
Michael D. Hill
Samuel Wiebe
Affiliation:
University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Michael D. Hill
Affiliation:
University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , May 2011 , pp. 383 - 384
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2011

References

1 Sackett, DL. Bias in analytic research. J Chronic Dis. 1979;32: 51–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2 MRC Streptomycin in Tuberculosis Trials Committee. Streptomycin treatment for pulmonary tuberculosis. Br Med J. 1948;ii:769–82.Google Scholar
3 Schulz, KF, Chalmers, I, Hayes, RJ, Altman, DG. Empirical evidence of bias: dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA. 1995;273(5):408–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 The EC/IC Bypass Study Group. Failure of extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1985;313:1191–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Sackett, DL, Hoey, J. Why randomized controlled trials fail but needn’t: a new series is launched. CMAJ. 2000 May 2;162(9): 1301–2.Google ScholarPubMed
6 Hebert, PC, Fergusson, DA. Are we keeping research participants safe enough? CMAJ. 2010 July 13;182(10):E428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7 Lehrer, J. The truth wears off. Is there something wrong with the scientific method? The New Yorker. 2010 December 13.Google Scholar
8 Ioannidis, JP. Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research. JAMA. 2005 July 13;294(2):218–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed