Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T23:21:34.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations on the Ethical and Social Aspects of Disorders of Consciousness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2016

Eric Racine ,
Catherine Rodrigue ,
James L. Bernat ,
Richard Riopelle  and
Sam D. Shemie
Eric Racine*
Affiliation:
Neuroethics Research Unit, Department of Medicine and Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université de Montréal Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Biomedical Ethics Unit, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Catherine Rodrigue
Affiliation:
Neuroethics Research Unit, Department of Medicine and Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université de Montréal
James L. Bernat
Affiliation:
Neurology Department, Dartmouth-Hitchcock, Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
Richard Riopelle
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Sam D. Shemie
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
*
Neuroethics Research Unit, Institut de recherches cliniques de Montréal (IRCM), 110 avenue des Pins Ouest, Montréal, Québec, H2W lR7, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The care of chronically unconscious patients raises vexing medical, ethical, and social questions concerning diagnosis, prognosis, communication with family members, and decision making, including the withdrawal of life support. We provide updates on major controversies surrounding disorders of consciousness. Issues such as withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration – which had been considered “settled” by many in the medical, legal and ethical communities – have resurfaced under the pressure of social groups and religious authorities. Some assumptions about the level of awareness and the prognosis of vegetative state and minimal conscious patients are questioned by advances in clinical care because of insights produced by neuroscience research techniques, particularly functional neuroimaging. Both the clinical and neuroscience dimensions of disorders of consciousness raise complex issues such as resource allocation and high levels of diagnostic inaccuracies (at least, for the vegetative state). We conclude by highlighting areas needing further research and collaboration.

Résumé

Résumé

La prise en charge de patients inconscients chronique soulève des questions médicales, éthiques et sociales qui sont éprouvantes en ce qui concerne le diagnostic, le pronostic, la communication avec les membres de la famille et les décisions à prendre, dont le retrait des mesures de maintien en vie. Nous faisons une mise à jour des grandes controverses concernant les troubles de la conscience. Les controverses telles le retrait de la nutrition artificielle et de l'hydratation - qui étaient considérées comme résolues par plusieurs membres des communautés médicale, légale et éthique - ont refait surface sous la pression de groupes sociaux et d'autorités religieuses. Certaines notions au sujet du niveau de conscience et du pronostic de l'état végétatif et les patients minimalement conscients, qui étaient tenues pour acquises, sont remises en question à cause des progrès dans les soins cliniques découlant des techniques de recherche en neurosciences, particulièrement de l'imagerie fonctionnelle. Les dimensions cliniques et neuroscientifiques des troubles de la conscience soulèvent des enjeux complexes tels l'allocation des ressources et le taux élevé d'inexactitudes diagnostiques (du moins pour l'état végétatif). En conclusion, nous soulignons les domaines dans lesquels des recherches et des collaborations plus poussées sont nécessaires.

Type
Review Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 37 , Issue 6 , November 2010 , pp. 758 - 768
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2010

References

1. Koehler, PJ, Wijdicks, EF. Historical study of coma: looking back through medical and neurological texts. Brain. 2008; 131(Pt 3):877–89.10.1093/brain/awm33218208847Google Scholar
2. Moruzzi, G, Magoun, HW. Brain stem reticular formation and activation of the EEG. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1949; 1(4):455–73.10.1016/0013-4694(49)90219-918421835Google Scholar
3. Bernat, JL. Chronic disorders of consciousness. Lancet. 2006; 367 (9517):1181–92.10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68508-516616561Google Scholar
4. Posner, JB, Saper, CB, Schiff, ND, Plum, Plum F. and Posner’s diagnosis of stupor and coma. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007.Google Scholar
5. Bernat, JL. Ethical issues in neurology. 3rd ed. Philadephia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2008.Google Scholar
6. Shiel, A, Gelling, L, Wilson, B, Coleman, M, Pickard, JD. Difficulties in diagnosing the vegetative state. Br J Neurosurg. 2004; 18(1):5–7.10.1080/0268869041000166062515040709Google Scholar
7. Bernat, JL. Chronic consciousness disorders. Annu Rev Med. 2009; 60:381–92.10.1146/annurev.med.60.060107.09125019630578Google Scholar
8. Laureys, S, Owen, AM, Schiff, ND. Brain function in coma, vegetative state, and related disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2004; 3(9):537–46.10.1016/S1474-4422(04)00852-X15324722Google Scholar
9. Cartlidge, N. States related to or confused with coma. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001; 71 Suppl 1: i18–9.AMBIGUOUS (234 citations)Google Scholar
10. Canadian Medical Association. Guidelines for the diagnosis of brain death. CMAJ. 1987; 136(2):200A-B.AMBIGUOUS (217 citations)Google Scholar
11. Patel, YC, Ezzat, S, Chik, CL, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly: a Canadian perspective. Clin Invest Med. 2000; 23(3):172–87.1091154Google Scholar
12. Lazar, NM, Shemie, SD, Webster, GC, Dickens, BM. Bioethics for clinicians: 24. Brain death. CMAJ. 2001; 164(6):833–6.11276553Google Scholar
13. Shemie, SD, Doig, C, Dickens, B, et al. Severe brain injury to neurological determination of death: Canadian forum recommendations. CMAJ. 2006; 174(6):S1–13.AMBIGUOUS (276 citations)Google Scholar
14. Barrington Research Group Inc. for the Summative Evaluation Steering of the Committee: Canadian Council for Donation and Transplantation. Canadian Council for Donation and Transplantation (CCDT) summative evaluation final report. Calgary: Canadian Council for Donation and Transplantation; 2006.AMBIGUOUS (744001 citations)Google Scholar
15. Rocker, GM, Cook, DJ, Shemie, SD. Practice variation in end of life care in the ICU: implications for patients with severe brain injury. Can J Anaesth. 2006; 53(8):814–9.10.1007/BF0302279916873349Google Scholar
16. Hornby, K, Shemie, SD, Teitelbaum, J, Doig, C. Variability in hospital-based brain death guidelines in Canada. Can J Anaesth. 2006; 53(6):613–9.10.1007/BF0302185416738298Google Scholar
17. Doig, CJ, Young, K, Teitelbaum, J, Shemie, SD. Brief survey: determining brain death in Canadian intensive care units. Can J Anaesth. 2006; 53(6):609–12.10.1007/BF0302185316738297Google Scholar
18. Powner, DJ, Hernandez, M, Rives, TE. Variability among hospital policies for determining brain death in adults. Crit Care Med. 2004; 32(6):1284–8.10.1097/01.CCM.0000127265.62431.0D15187507Google Scholar
19. Greer, DM, Varelas, PN, Haque, S, Wijdicks, EF. Variability of brain death determination guidelines in leading US neurologic institutions. Neurology. 2008; 70(4):284–9.10.1212/01.wnl.0000296278.59487.c218077794Google Scholar
20. Giacino, JT, Ashwal, S, Childs, N, et al. The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology. 2002;58(3):349–53.10.1212/WNL.58.3.34911839831Google Scholar
21. Stevens, RD, Bhardwaj, A. Approach to the comatose patient. Crit Care Med. 2006; 34(1):31–41.10.1097/01.CCM.0000194534.42661.9F16374153Google Scholar
22. The Multi-Society Task Force on PVS. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state (1). N Engl J Med. 1994;330(21):1499–508.10.1056/NEJM1994052633021077818633Google Scholar
23. Bates, D. The prognosis of medical coma. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001;71 Suppl 1:3.AMBIGUOUS (234 citations)Google Scholar
24. Jennett, B, Plum, F. Persistent vegetative state after brain damage. A syndrome in search of a name. Lancet. 1972;1(7753):734–7.4111204Google Scholar
25. Zeman, A. Persistent vegetative state. Lancet. 1997;350(9080):795–9.10.1016/S0140-6736(97)06447-79298013Google Scholar
26. Jennett, B. The vegetative state: medical facts, ethical and legal dilemmas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.Google Scholar
27. American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Recommendations for use of uniform nomenclature pertinent to patients with severe alterations in consciousness. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76(2):205–9.10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80031-X7848080Google Scholar
28. The Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Practice parameters: assessment and management of patients in the persistent vegetative state (summary statement). Neurology. 1995;45(5):1015–8.10.1212/WNL.45.5.10157746375Google Scholar
29. Andrews, K. International Working Party on the management of the vegetative state: summary report. Brain Inj. 1996;10(11):797–806.10.1080/0269905961239188905158Google Scholar
30. Royal College of Physicians. The vegetative state: guidance on diagnosis and management. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2003.Google Scholar
31. National Health and Medical Research Council. Post-coma unresponsiveness and minimally responsive state: a guide for families and carers of people with profound brain damage. Canberra: Government of Australia; 2008. p. 31.Google Scholar
32. Laureys, S. Science and society: death, unconsciousness and the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6(11):899–909.10.1038/nrn178916261182Google Scholar
33. Fins, JJ, Illes, J, Bernat, JL, Hirsch, J, Laureys, S, Murphy, E. Neuroimaging and disorders of consciousness: envisioning an ethical research agenda. Am J Bioeth. 2008;8(9):3–12.AMBIGUOUS (6 citations)Google Scholar
34. Coleman, MR, Rodd, JM, Davis, MH, et al. Do vegetative patients retain aspects of language comprehension? Evidence from fMRI. Brain. 2007;130(Pt 10):2494–507.17827174Google Scholar
35. Owen, AM, Coleman, MR, Boly, M, Davis, MH, Laureys, S, Pickard, JD. Detecting awareness in the vegetative state. Science. 2006;313(5792):1402.10.1126/science.113019716959998Google Scholar
36. Giacino, J, Whyte, J. The vegetative and minimally conscious states: current knowledge and remaining questions. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2005;20(1):30–50.10.1097/00001199-200501000-0000515668569Google Scholar
37. Laureys, S, Boly, M. What is it like to be vegetative or minimally conscious? Curr Opin Neurol. 2007;20(6):609–13.10.1097/WCO.0b013e3282f1d6dd17992077Google Scholar
38. Stepan, C, Haidinger, G, Binder, H. Prevalence of persistent vegetative state/apallic syndrome in Vienna. Eur J Neurol. 2004;11(7):461–6.10.1111/j.1468-1331.2004.00817.x15257684Google Scholar
39. Childs, NL, Mercer, WN, Childs, HW. Accuracy of diagnosis of persistent vegetative state. Neurology. 1993;43(8):1465–7.10.1212/WNL.43.8.14658350997Google Scholar
40. Andrews, K, Murphy, L, Munday, R, Littlewood, C. Misdiagnosis of the vegetative state: retrospective study in a rehabilitation unit. BMJ. 1996;313(7048):13–6.10.1136/bmj.313.7048.138664760Google Scholar
41. Schnakers, C, Vanhaudenhuyse, A, Giacino, J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment. BMC Neurol. 2009;9:35.10.1186/1471-2377-9-3519622138Google Scholar
42. Gill-Thwaites, H. Lotteries, loopholes and luck: misdiagnosis in the vegetative state patient. Brain Inj. 2006;20(13–14):1321–8.10.1080/0269905060108180217378223Google Scholar
43. Youngner, SJ, Landefeld, CS, Coulton, CJ, Juknialis, BW, Leary, M. Brain death and organ retrieval. A cross-sectional survey of knowledge and concepts among health professionals. JAMA. 1989;261(15):2205–10.10.1001/jama.1989.034201500550372926968Google Scholar
44. Tomlinson, T. Misunderstanding death on a respirator. Bioethics. 1990;4(3):253–64.10.1111/j.1467-8519.1990.tb00088.x11651990Google Scholar
45. Young, B, Blume, W, Lynch, A. Brain death and the persistent vegetative state: similarities and contrasts. Can J Neurol Sci. 1989;16(4):388–93.2680003Google Scholar
46. Montagnino, BA, Ethier, AM. The experiences of pediatric nurses caring for children in a persistent vegetative state. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2007;8(5):440–6.10.1097/01.PCC.0000282172.11035.A617693906Google Scholar
47. Bell, TN. Nurses’ attitudes in caring for the comatose head-injured patient. J Neurosci Nurs. 1986;18(5):279–89.10.1097/01376517-198610000-000092945880Google Scholar
48. Kalmar, K, Giacino, JT. The JFK coma recovery scale-revised. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2005;15(3–4):454–60.10.1080/0960201044300042516350986Google Scholar
49. Crossman, J, Bankes, M, Bhan, A, Crockard, HA. The Glasgow coma score: reliable evidence? Injury. 1998;29(6):435–7.10.1016/S0020-1383(98)00079-59813699Google Scholar
50. Buechler, CM, Blostein, PA, Koestner, A, Hurt, K, Schaars, M, McKernan, J. Variation among trauma centers’ calculation of Glasgow coma scale score: results of a national survey. J Trauma. 1998;45(3):429–32.10.1097/00005373-199809000-000019751530Google Scholar
51. Shanteau, J, Linin, K. Subjective meaning of terms used in organ donation: analysis of word associations. In: Shanteau, J, Harris, R, editors. Organ donation and transplantation: psychological and behavioral factors. Washington: American Psychological Association; 1990. p. 37–49.Google Scholar
52. Siminoff, LA, Burant, C, Youngner, SJ. Death and organ procurement: public beliefs and attitudes. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2004;14(3):217–34.10.1353/ken.2004.003415495379Google Scholar
53. Wijdicks, EF, Wijdicks, CA. The portrayal of coma in contemporary motion pictures. Neurology. 2006;66(9):1300–3.10.1212/01.wnl.0000210497.62202.e916682658Google Scholar
54. Wijdicks, EF, Wijdicks, MF. Coverage of coma in headlines of US newspapers from 2001 through 2005. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81 (10):1332–6.10.4065/81.10.133217036558Google Scholar
55. Racine, E, Amaram, R, Seidler, M, Karczewska, M, Illes, J. Media coverage of the persistent vegetative state and end-of-life decision-making. Neurology. 2008;71(13):1027–32.10.1212/01.wnl.0000320507.64683.ee18685135Google Scholar
56. Macdonald, ME, Liben, S, Carnevale, FA, Cohen, SR. Signs of life and signs of death: brain death and other mixed messages at the end of life. J Child Health Care. 2008;12(2):92–105.10.1177/136749350808854618469294Google Scholar
57. Gofton, TE, Chouinard, PA, Young, GB, et al. Functional MRI study of the primary somatosensory cortex in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest. Exp Neurol. 2009;217(2):320–7.10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.03.01119306870Google Scholar
58. Monti, MM, Vanhaudenhuyse, A, Coleman, MR, et al. Willful modulation of brain activity in disorders of consciousness. N Engl J Med. 362(7):579–89.10.1056/NEJMoa090537020130250Google Scholar
59. Racine, E, Bell, E. Clinical and public translation of neuroimaging research in disorders of consciousness challenges current diagnostic and public understanding paradigms. Am J Bioeth. 2008;8(9):13–5; discussion W1–3.AMBIGUOUS (4 citations)Google Scholar
60. Schiff, ND, Giacino, JT, Kalmar, K, et al. Behavioural improvements with thalamic stimulation after severe traumatic brain injury. Nature. 2007;448(7153):600–3.10.1038/nature0604117671503Google Scholar
61. Machado, C, Rodriguez, R, Carballo, M, Perez, J, Korein, J. Results of proton MRS studies in PVS and MCS patients. Can J Neurol Sci. 2009;36(3):365–9.10.1017/S031716710000713719534340Google Scholar
62. Tshibanda, L, Vanhaudenhuyse, A, Galanaud, D, Boly, M, Laureys, S, Puybasset, L. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy and diffusion tensor imaging in coma survivors: promises and pitfalls. Prog Brain Res. 2009;177:215–29.19818904Google Scholar
63. Yuan, W, Holland, SK, Schmithorst, VJ, et al. Diffusion tensor MR imaging reveals persistent white matter alteration after traumatic brain injury experienced during early childhood. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28(10):1919–25.10.3174/ajnr.A069817905895Google Scholar
64. Huisman, TA, Schwamm, LH, Schaefer, PW, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging as potential biomarker of white matter injury in diffuse axonal injury. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004;25(3):370–6.15037457Google Scholar
65. Voss, HU, Uluc, AM, Dyke, JP, et al. Possible axonal regrowth in late recovery from the minimally conscious state. J Clin Invest. 2006;116(7):2005–11.10.1172/JCI2702116823492Google Scholar
66. Lombardi, F, Taricco, M, De Tanti, A, Telaro, E, Liberati, A. Sensory stimulation of brain-injured individuals in coma or vegetative state: results of a Cochrane systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16(5):464–72.10.1191/0269215502cr519oa12194617Google Scholar
67. Schiff, ND. Modeling the minimally conscious state: measurements of brain function and therapeutic possibilities. Prog Brain Res. 2005;150:473–93.16186043Google Scholar
68. Whyte, J, Katz, D, Long, D, et al. Predictors of outcome in prolonged posttraumatic disorders of consciousness and assessment of medication effects: a multicenter study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(3):453–62.10.1016/j.apmr.2004.05.01615759228Google Scholar
69. Brefel-Courbon, C, Payoux, P, Ory, F, et al. Clinical and imaging evidence of zolpidem effect in hypoxic encephalopathy. Ann Neurol. 2007;62(1):102–5.10.1002/ana.2111017357126Google Scholar
70. Canadian Medical Association. Advance directives for resuscitation and other life-saving or sustaining measures. CMAJ. 1992;146(6):1072A–B.AMBIGUOUS (331 citations)Google Scholar
71. Roy, DJ, Williams, JR, Dickens, BM. Bioethics in Canada. Scarborough, ON: Prentice Hall Canada; 1994.Google Scholar
72. Canadian MedicalAssociation. CMACode ofethics (Update 2004). 2004 [cited 2010 May 13]. Available from: http://policybase.cma.ca/PolicyPDF/PD04-06.pdf. AMBIGUOUS (636950 citations)Google Scholar
73. Rocker, G, Dunbar, S. Withholding or withdrawal of life support: the Canadian Critical Care Society position paper. J Palliat Care. 2000;16 Suppl:S53–62.AMBIGUOUS (51 citations)Google Scholar
74. Singer, PA, Robertson, G, Roy, DJ. Bioethics for clinicians: 6. Advance care planning. CMAJ. 1996;155(12):1689–92.8976334Google Scholar
75. Godlovitch, G, Mitchell, I, Doig, CJ. Discontinuing life support in comatose patients: an example from Canadian case law. CMAJ. 2005;172(9):1172–3.10.1503/cmaj.05037615851705Google Scholar
76. Thompson, T, Barbour, R, Scwartz, L. Adherence to advance directives in critical care decision making: a vignette study. Br Med J. 2003;327:1–7.10.1136/bmj.327.7405.1Google Scholar
77. Racine, E, Dion, MJ, Wijman, CA, Illes, J, Lansberg, MG. Profiles of neurological outcome prediction among intensivists. Neurocrit Care. 2009;11(3):345–52.10.1007/s12028-009-9225-919430929Google Scholar
78. Boards of directors of the Canadian Healthcare Association, Canadian Medical Association, Canadian Nurses Association, Catholic Health Association of Canada. Join statement on preventing and resolving ethical conflicts involving health care providers and persons receiving care. 1999 [cited 2010 May 13]. Available from: http://www.cna-nurses.ca/CNA/documents/pdf/publications/prevent_resolv_ethical_conflict_e.pdf.Google Scholar
79. Eisenberg, JB. Schiavo on the cutting edge: functional brain imaging and its impact on surrogate end-of-life decision-making. Neuroethics. 2008;1(2):75–83.10.1007/s12152-007-9000-6Google Scholar
80. Beauchamp, T, Childress, J. Principles of biomedical ethics. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.Google Scholar
81. Fins, JJ. Clinical pragmatism and the care of brain damaged patients : toward a palliative neuroethics for disorders of consciousness. Prog Brain Res. 2005;150:565–82.16186050Google Scholar
82. Miller, FG, Fins, JJ. Protecting human subjects in brain research: a pragmatic perspective. In: Illes, J, editor. Neuroethics: defining the issues in theory, practice, and policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006. p. 123“40.Google Scholar
83. Lennard-Jones, JE. Ethical and legal aspects of clinical hydration and nutritional support. BJU Int. 2000;85(4):398–403.10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00480.x10691813Google Scholar
84. Bacon, D, Williams, MA, Gordon, J. Position statement on laws and regulations concerning life-sustaining treatment, including artificial nutrition and hydration, for patients lacking decision-making capacity. Neurology. 2007;68(14):1097–10010.1212/01.wnl.0000259410.15317.f317404191Google Scholar
85. American Academy of Neurology. Position of the American Academy of Neurology on certain aspects of the care and management of the persistent vegetative state patient. Neurology. 1989;39(1):125–6.10.1212/WNL.39.1.1252909900Google Scholar
86. Pence, GE. Comas: Karen Quinlan and Nancy Cruzan. Classic cases on medical ethics. Boston: McGraw-Hill; 2004. p. 29–57.Google Scholar
87. Perry, JE, Churchill, LR, Kirshner, HS. The Terri Schiavo case: legal, ethical, and medical perspectives. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143(10):744–8.10.7326/0003-4819-143-10-200511150-0001216287796Google Scholar
88. Striano, P, Bifulco, F, Servillo, G. The saga of Eluana Englaro: another tragedy feeding the media. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35(6):1129–31.10.1007/s00134-009-1484-619367396Google Scholar
89. Pontifical Academy for Life and the World Medical Association of Catholic Medical Associations. Joint statement on the vegetative state. International Congress on “life sustaining treatments and vegetative state: Scientific advances and ethical dilemmas”; 2004 March 10–17; Rome; 2004 [cited 2010 May 13]. Available from: http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_academies/acdlife/documents/rc_pont-acd_life_doc_20040320_joint-statement-veget-state_en.html.Google Scholar
90. John, Paul II. Address of John Paul II to the participants in the International Congress on “life-sustaining treatments and vegetative state: Scientific advances and ethical dilemmas”. Vatican; 2004 [cited 2010 May 13]. Available from: http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/speeches/2004/march/documents/hf_jp-ii_spe_20040320_congress-fiamc_en.html.Google Scholar
91. Sim, J. Ethical issues in the management of persistent vegetative state. Physiother Res Int. 1997;2(2):7–11.AMBIGUOUS 9238747,9237312Google Scholar
92. Phipps, E, Whyte, J. Medical decision-making with persons who are minimally conscious: a commentary. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;78(1):77–82.10.1097/00002060-199901000-000209923434Google Scholar
93. Racine, E, Shevell, MI. Ethics in neonatal neurology: when is enough, enough? Pediatr Neurol. 2009;40(3):147–55.10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2008.09.01319218027Google Scholar
94. The Multi-Society Task Force on PVS. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state (2). N Engl J Med. 1994;330(22): 1572–9.10.1056/NEJM1994060233022068177248Google Scholar
95. Wade, DT. Ethical issues in diagnosis and management of patients in the permanent vegetative state. BMJ. 2001;322(7282):352–4.10.1136/bmj.322.7282.35211159664Google Scholar
96. Jonsen, AR, Siegler, M, Winslade, WT. Clinical ethics: a practical approach to ethical decision in clinical medicine. 4th ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 1998.Google Scholar
97. Fins, JJ. Rethinking disorders of consciousness: new research and its implications. Hastings Cent Rep. 2005;35(2):22–4.AMBIGUOUS 16225301,16092396,15957315Google Scholar