Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T02:01:09.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Myoclonic-like Finger Microdisplacements in Patients With Cerebellar Deficits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

Anne Beuter*
Affiliation:
Neurokinetics Laboratory (N-8280) Département de Kinanthropologic Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal Centre for Nonlinear Dynamics in Physiology and Medicine
John G. Milton
Affiliation:
Centre for Nonlinear Dynamics in Physiology and Medicine Department of Neurology, The University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, USA
Christiane Labrie
Affiliation:
Neurokinetics Laboratory (N-8280) Département de Kinanthropologic Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal
Deborah Black
Affiliation:
Département de Neurologie, Hôpital Hôtel Dieu, Montréal
*
Neurokinetics Laboratory (N-8280), Département de Kinanthropologie, Université du Québec à Montréal, CP 8888 Suc. A, Montréal, PQ, Canada H3C 3P8
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background:

Here we assess the ability of patients with cerebellar disease to execute a simple visually-guided movement task involving tracking of a target with the index finger.

Methods:

Spontaneous microdisplacements in index finger position are compared in patients with cerebellar deficits (ischemia [n = 3], multiple sclerosis [n = 3], degenerative cerebellar disease [n = 3]) and age-matched healthy subjects. Subjects were required to maintain a constant finger position relative to a stationary baseline displayed on an oscilloscope.

Results:

Unusual transient abrupt movements (saccadic or myoclonic-like) directed with or against gravity were seen in patients whose neurological deficits were the most severe (7/9 patients). These abrupt myoclonic-like movements occurred independently of visual input, were not associated with clinically observable myoclonus, and were not detected previously in patients with Parkinson’s disease. These abrupt myoclonic-like movements were not associated with abnormalities in either physiological tremor, or oscillations in finger microdisplacements induced by insertion of a delay (300–1400 ms) into the visual feedback of this finger “holding” experiment. An unexpected finding is that the results obtained for patients with cerebellar deficits by insertion of an experimental delay are not significantly different from those obtained with their age-matched controls.

Conclusions:

These observations suggest that abrupt myoclonic-like movements are a characteristic abnormality of patients with a variety of cerebellar deficits and emphasize the value of this simple motor tracking task for characterizing movement disorders.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 1995

References

1.Fahn, S.The varied clinical expressions of dystonia. Neurol Clin 1984; 2: 541554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Flowers, K.Lack of prediction in the motor behaviour of parkinsonism. Brain 1978; 101: 3552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Flowers, K.Some frequency response characteristics of parkinsonism on pursuit tracking. Brain 1978; 101: 1934.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Moore, AP.Impaired sensorimotor integration in Parkinsonism and dyskinesia: a role for corollary discharge? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987; 50: 544552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Warabi, T., Noda, H., Yanagisawa, N., et al. Changes in sensorimotor function associated with the degree of bradykinesia of Parkinson’s disease. Brain 1986; 109: 12091224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Abdel-Malek, A., Markham, CH., Marmarelis, PZ., et al. Quantifying deficiencies associated with Parkinson’s disease by use of time-series analysis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1988: 69: 2433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Beuter, A., Larocque, D., Glass, L.Complex oscillations in a human motor system. J Mot Behav 1989; 21: 277289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Glass, L., Beuter, A., Larocque, D.Time delays, oscillations and chaos in physiological control systems. Math Biosci 1988: 90: 111125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Merton, PA., Morton, RA., Rashbass, C.Visual feedback in hand tremor. Nature 1967; 216: 583584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Smith, KU., Putz, V., Molitor, K.Delayed retinal feedback of eye movements: a dynamic basis of perceptual disabilities. J Appl Psychol 1970; 54: 538548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Vasilakos, K., Beuter, A.Effects of noise on a delayed visual feedback system. J Theor Biol 1993; 165: 389407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Beuter, A., Labrie, C., Vasilakos, K.Transient dynamics in motor control of patients with Parkinson’s disease. Chaos 1991; 1, 3: 279286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Beuter, A., Milton, J., Labrie, C., et al. Delayed visual feedback and movement control in Parkinson’s disease. Exp Neurol 1990; 110: 228235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Brodal, A.Neurological Anatomy in Relation to Clinical Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press. 1981.Google Scholar
15.Holmes, G.The symptoms of acute cerebellar injuries due to gunshot injuries. Brain 1917; 40: 461535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Gilman, S., Bloedel, JR., Lechtenberg, R.Disorders of the Cerebellum. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company, 1981.Google Scholar
17.Diener, HC., Dichgans, J., Guschlbauer, B., et al. The coordination of posture and voluntary movement in patients with cerebellar dysfunction. Mov Disord 1992; 7: 1422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Stein, JF., Glickstein, M.Role of the cerebellum in the visual guidance of movement. Physiol Rev 1992; 72: 9671017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Miall, RC., Weir, DJ., Stein, JF.Visuo-motor tracking during reversible inactivation of the cerebellum. Exp Brain Res 1987; 65: 455464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Oldfield, RC.The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971; 9: 97113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Young, RR., Hagbarth, KE.Physiological tremor enhanced by manoeuvres affecting the segmental stretch reflex. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1980; 43: 248256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Morrice, BL., Becker, WJ., Hoffer, JA., et al. Manual tracking performance in patients with cerebellar incoordination: effects of mechanical loading. Can J Neurol Sci 1987; 17: 275285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Gotman, J., Gloor, P.Automatic recognition and quantification of interictal epileptic activity in human scalp EEG. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1976; 41: 513529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Bendat, JS., Piersol, AG.Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1986.Google Scholar
25.Beppu, H., Nagaoka, M., Tanaka, R.Analysis of cerebellar motor disorders by visually-guided elbow tracking movement. Brain 1987; 110: 118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Flament, D., Vilis, T., Hore, J.Dependence of cerebellar tremor on proprioceptive but not visual feedback. Exp Neurol 1984; 84: 314325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Cody, FWJ., Lovgreen, B., Schady, W.Increased dependence upon visual information of movement performance during visuo-motor tracking in cerebellar disorders. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1993; 89: 399407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.Schieber, MH.How might the motor cortex individuate movements? Trends Neurosci 1990; 13: 440445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Bizzi, E., Mussa-Ivaldi, FA., Giszter, S.Computations underlying the execution of movement: a biological perspective. Science 1991; 253: 287291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30.Miller, NR.Walsh and Hoyt’s Clinical Neuro-Ophthalmology. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1985; 2: 608784.Google Scholar
31.Gotman, J.Computer-assisted EEG analysis. In: Wyllie, E., ed. Treatment of Epilepsy: Principles and Practices. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger, 1993, 268277.Google Scholar
32.Schiff, SJ., Milton, JG., Heller, J., Weinstein, SL.Wavelet transforms and surrogate data for electroencephalographic spikes and seizure localization. Opt Eng 1994; 33: 21622169.Google Scholar