Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:27:29.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Motor Pathway Analysis in HAM/TSP Using Magnetic Stimulation and F-waves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

Ronald E. Young ,
Owen C. Morgan  and
Allan Forster
Ronald E. Young*
Affiliation:
Departments of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of the West Indies, Mona, Jamaica
Owen C. Morgan
Affiliation:
Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of the West Indies, Mona, Jamaica
Allan Forster
Affiliation:
Neurophysiology, Dundee Royal Infirmary, Dundee, Scotland
*
Departments of Basic Medical Sciences, University of the West Indies, Mona,Kingston 7, Jamaica, West Indies.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background:

Tropical Spastic Paraparesis/HTLV-I Associated Myelopathy (HAM/TSP) is a chronic, progressive myelopathy endemic to the Caribbean. In HAM/TSP, peripheral motor pathways have been assessed using electromyography and nerve conduction studies; central motor pathways have been assessed to a limited extent using electrocortical stimulation. We used magnetic cortical stimulation (a painless alternative to electrocortical stimulation) and F-wave analysis to study conduction in the central and peripheral motor pathways in 18 HTLV-I seropositive, Jamaican TSP patients (ages 29- 70 years; duration of symptoms 3-20 years) and 22 normal controls.

Methods:

Magnetic cortical stimulation was effected using a 9 cm diameter undamped MES10 coil. F-waves and M-responses were elicited by electrical stimulation of the ulnar nerve at the wrist, and deep peroneal stimulation at the knee. Stimulation and recording of response latencies in abductor digitii minimi (ADM) and tibialis anterior (TA) were carried out using a Cadwell Excel system.

Results:

With cortical stimulation, response latencies (TMCTs) to ADM and TA were prolonged in the patients relative to controls. F-wave and M-response latencies were unaffected, suggesting no peripheral pathology. Latency (CMCT) between cortex and lumbar cord was significantly prolonged; that between cortex and C7/T1, also, but less markedly (P < 0.0005). Amplitudes of cortically evoked responses were significantly reduced only in the lower limbs (TA). CMCT increased as the disease progressed from mild to moderate, thereafter remaining largely unchanged.

Conclusions:

Meta-analysis of interlaboratory control data revealed no significant differences in TMCTs between our controls and others studied using similar techniques. The observations are consistent with pathology affecting mainly the thoracolumbar cord in HAM/TSP.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , February 1998 , pp. 48 - 54
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 1998

References

REFERENCES

1.Montgomery, RD, Cruickshank, EK, Robertson, WB, Mcmenemey, WH. Clinical and pathological observations on Jamaican neuropathy: a report on 206 cases. Brain 1964; 87: 425–462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Morgan, OStC, Montgommery, RD, Rodgers-Johnson, P. The myeloneuropathies of Jamaica: an unfolding story. QJ Med 1988; 67(252): 273–281.Google ScholarPubMed
3.Iwasaki, Y. Neuropathology of HAM/TSP in Japan. Proceedings of the First Workshop on Neuropathology of Retrovirus Infections, Tokyo, 1989 (Aug 31).Google Scholar
4.Morgan, OStC. Tropical spastic paraparesis: clinical features. In: Blattner, WG, ed. Human Retrovirology: HTLV, NY, Raven Press Ltd., 1990: 199–204.Google Scholar
5.Morgan, OStC, Barton, EN. Jamaican neuropathy revisited. West Indian Med J 1993; 42: 138–141.Google ScholarPubMed
6.Shibasaki, H. Notes on the pathophysiology of HTLV-I-associated myelopathy based on clinical and electrophysiological observations. In: Roman, G, Vernant, JC, Osame, M , eds. HTLV-I and the Nervous System. New York: Alan R. Liss Inc., 1989: 227–232.Google Scholar
7.Castillo, JL, Cartier, L, Araya, F, Verdugo, R, Gibbs, C. Evoked potential abnormalities in progressive spastic paraparesis. Acta Neurol Scand 1991; 83: 151–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Eardley, I, Fowler, CJ, Nagendran, K, Kirby, RS, Rudge, P. The neurology of tropical spastic paraparesis. Br J Urol 1991; 68: 589–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Hugon, J, Lubeau, M, Tabaraud, F, et al. Central motor conduction in motor neuron disease. Ann Neurol 1987; 22: 544–546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Hugon, J, Giordano, C, Dumas, M, et al. Evoked motor potentials in patients with tropical spastic paraplegia. In: Roman, G, Vernant, JC, Osame, M , eds. HTLV-I and the Nervous System. New York: Alan R. Liss Inc., 1989: 233–238.Google Scholar
11.Tomita, I, Motomura, M, Nagasato, K, et al. Central motor conduction time (CCT) in patients with human T-lymphotropic virus Type I-associated myelopathy (HAM). In: Roman, G, Vernant, JC, Osame, M, eds. HTLV-I and the Nervous System. New York: Alan R. Liss Inc., 1989: 239–244.Google Scholar
12.Rothwell, JC, Thompson, PD, Day, BL, Boyd, S, Marsden, CD. Stimulation of the human motor cortex through the scalp. Exptl Physiol 1991; 76: 159–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Barker, AT, Jalinous, R, Freeston, IL. Non-invasive stimulation of human motor cortex. Lancet 1985; 1: 1106–1107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Ravnborg, M, Liguori, R, Christiansen, P, Larsson, H, Sørenson, PS. The diagnostic reliability of magnetically evoked motor potentials in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 1992; 42: 1296–1301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Barker, AT, Freeston, IL, Jalinous, R, Jarratt, JA. Clinical evaluation of conduction time measurements in central motor pathways using magnetic stimulation of human brain. Lancet 1986; 1: 1325–1326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Claus, D, Waddy, HM, Harding, AE, Murray, NMF, Thomas, PK. Hereditary motor and sensory neuropathies and hereditary spastic paraplegia: a magnetic stimulation study. Ann Neurol 1990; 28: 43–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Osame, M. Review of WHO Dagashima Meeting and Diagnostic Guidelines for HAM/TSP. In: Blattner, WA, ed. Human Retrovirology: HTLV. New York: Raven Press. 1990: 192–195.Google Scholar
18.Abbruzzese, G, Dall’Agata, D, Morena, M, et al. Electrical stimulation of the motor tracts in cervical spondylosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1988; 51: 796–802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Day, BL, Dressler, D, Maertens de Noordhout, A, et al. Electric and magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex: surface EMG and single motor unit responses. J Physiol 1989; 412: 449–473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Hess, CW, Mills, KR, Murray, NMF. Magnetic stimulation of the human brain: facilitation of motor responses by voluntary contraction of ipsilateral and contralateral muscles with additional observations on an amputee. Neurosci Lett 1986; 71: 235–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Kimura, J. Principles and pitfalls of nerve conduction studies. Ann Neurol 1984; 16: 415–429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Ma, DM, Liveson, JA. Nerve Conduction Handbook, Philadelphia. USA, FA. Davis Company, 1983: 362.Google Scholar
23.Wilkinson, L. REGM: A multivariate general linear hypothesis program. Am Statistician 1980; 34: 182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Wilkinson, L. SYSTAT SYSTAT, Inc., Evanston, IL,. USA, 1987: 822.Google Scholar
25.Barker, AT, Freeston, IL, Jalinous, R, Jarratt, JA. Magnetic stimulation of the human brain and peripheral nervous system: an introduction and the results of an intitial clinical evaluation. Neurosurgery 1987; 20: 100–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Hess, CW, Mills, KR, Murray, NMF. Responses in small hand muscles from magnetic stimulation of the human brain. J Physiol 1987; 388: 397–419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Mills, KR, Murray, NMF, Hess, CW. Magnetic and electrical transcranial brain stimulation: physiological mechanisms and clinical applications. Neurosurgery 1987; 20: 164–168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.Ingram, DA, Thompson, AJ, Swash, M. Central motor conduction in multiple sclerosis: evaluation of abnormalities revealed by transcutaneous magnetic stimulation of the brain. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1988; 51: 487–494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Caramia, MD, Pardal, AM, Zarola, F, Rossini, PM. Electric versus magnetic transcranial stimulation of the brain in healthy humans: a comparative study of central motor tracts ‘conductivity’ and ‘excitability’. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1989; 479: 98–104.Google Scholar
30.Cowan, JMA, Rothwell, JC, Dick, JPR, et al. Abnormalities in central motor pathway conduction in multiple sclerosis. Lancet 1984; 2: 304–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31.Berardelli, A, Inghilleri, M, Manfredi, M, et al. Cortical and cervical stimulation after hemispheric infarction. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987; 50: 861–865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32.Berardelli, A, Inghilleri, M, Cruccu, G, et al. Stimulation of motor tracts in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1988; 51: 677–683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33.Ingram, DA, Swash, M. Central motor conduction is abnormal in motor neurone disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987; 50: 159–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34.Thompson, PD, Day, BL, Rothwell, JC, et al. The interpretation of electromyographic responses to electrical stimulation of the motor cortex in deseases of the upper motor neurone. J Neurol Sci 1987; 80: 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35.Mayr, N, Baumgartner, C, Zeitlhofer, J, Deecke, L. The sensitivity of transcranial cortical magnetic stimulation in detecting pyramidal tract lesions in clinically definite multiple sclerosis. Neurology 1991; 41: 566–569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36.Arimura, K, Arimura, Y, Yonenaga, Y, Rosales, R, Osame, M. Clinical electrophysiologic findings in patients with HTLV-I-associated myelopathy (HAM). In: Roman, G, Vernant, JC, Osame, M, eds. HTLV-I and the Nervous System. New York: Alan R. Liss Inc., 1989: 245–250.Google Scholar
37.Masaru, I, Higuchi, I, Yoshimine, K, et al. Pathological changes in skeletal muscle in HTLV-I-associated myelopathy. J Neurol Sci 1992; 110: 73–78.Google Scholar
38.Iwasaki, Y. Pathology of chronic myelopathy associated with HTLV-I infection (HAM/TSP). J Neurol Sci 1990; 96: 103–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed