Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-22T15:58:37.749Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Management of .22 Caliber Gunshot Wounds of the Brain: A Review of 49 Cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

L. Suddaby ,
B. Weir  and
C. Forsyth
L. Suddaby*
Affiliation:
Division of Neurosurgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
B. Weir
Affiliation:
Division of Neurosurgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
C. Forsyth
Affiliation:
Division of Neurosurgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
*
Department of Surgery, 2D2.24 W.C. Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2B7
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We analyzed the charts and CT scans of 49 cases of civilian .22 caliber gunshot wounds of the brain admitted to the University of Alberta and Royal Alexandra Hospitals between 1975 and 1985. The average age of the patients was 30 years, 88% were males, 88% were suicide attempts. There were no deaths among patients with an initial coma score above 12 whereas the mortality rate was 85% for those admitted with a score of 7 or less. All those with fixed pupils on admission died. The overall mortality rate of 61% is comparable to that of other series of civilian gunshot wounds including those in which more aggressive surgical management was undertaken. We recommend that no treatment be given those cases with an admission coma score of 3 and/or fixed pupils and that simple scalp wound debridement be employed with those having a coma score of 7 or less. Tract exploration and retrieval of bullet fragments is not indicated, as retained fragments carry a very low incidence of complications (e.g. abscess formation). In patients in good condition (GCS ≥ 12) the management of intracranial hematomas should be independent of their etiology and approached aggressively.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , August 1987 , pp. 268 - 272
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 1987

References

REFERENCES

1.Byrnes, DP, Crockard, HA, Gordon, DS, et al. Penetrating cranio-cerebral missile injuries in the civil disturbances in Northern Ireland. Br J Surg 1974; 61: 169–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Crockard, HA. Bullet injuries of the brain. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1974; 55: 111–123.Google ScholarPubMed
3.Gurdjian, ES. The treatment of penetrating wounds of the brain sustained in warfare: a historical review. J Neurosurg 1974; 39: 157–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Hammon, WM. Analysis of 2187 consecutive penetrating wounds of the brain from Vietnam. J Neurosurg 1971; 34: 127–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Small, JM, Turner, EA. A surgical experience of 1200 cases of penetrating brain wounds in battle, N.W. Europe, 1944-1945. Br J Surg (War Suppl) 1947; 1: 62–74.Google Scholar
6.Jennett, B, Teasdale, G. Management of Head Injuries. Philadelphia: FA Davis Co., 1981.Google Scholar
7.Bakay, L. Missile injuries of the brain. NY State J Med 1982; March: 313–319.Google Scholar
8.Goodman, JM, Kalsbeck, J. Outcome of self inflicted gunshot wounds of the head. J Trauma 1965; 5: 636–642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Haddad, FS. Nature and management of penetrating head injuries during the Civil War in Lebanon. Can J Surg 1978; 21: 233–238.Google ScholarPubMed
10.Hubschman, NO, Shapiro, K, Baden, M, et al. Craniocerebral gunshot injuries in civilian practice — prognostic criteria and surgical management: experience with 82 cases. J Trauma 1979; 19: 6–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Yashon, D, Jane, JA, Martonffy, D, et al. Management of civilian craniocerebral bullet injuries. Amer Surg 1972; 38: 346–351.Google ScholarPubMed
12.Kirkpatrick, JB, DiMaio, V. Civilian gunshot wounds of the brain. J Neurosurg 1978; 49: 185–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Raimondi, AD, Samuelson, GH. Craniocerebral gunshot wounds in civilian practice. J Neurosurg 1970; 32: 647–653.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Hernesniemi, J. Penetrating craniocerebral gunshot wounds in civilians. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1979; 49: 199–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Shoung, HM, Sichez, JP, Pertuiset, B. The early prognosis of craniocerebral gunshot wounds in civilian practice as an aid to the choice of treatment. A series of 56 cases studied by computerized tomography. Acta Neurochir 1985; 74: 27–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Clark, WC, Muhlbauer, MS, Watridge, CB, et al. Analysis of 76 civilian craniocerebral gunshot wounds. J Neurosurg 1986; 65: 9–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed