Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:29:47.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interhemispheric Cysts with Agenesis of the Corpus Callosum Requiring Open Fenestration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2020

Amirti Vivekanandan
Affiliation:
Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
Mohamad Abbass
Affiliation:
Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
Aisha Ghare
Affiliation:
Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
Robert Hammond
Affiliation:
Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada Neuropathology, London Health Sciences Centre, University Campus, London, Ontario, Canada
Adrianna Ranger*
Affiliation:
Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada Paediatric Neurosurgery, Children’s Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre, Victoria Campus, London, Ontario, Canada
*
Correspondence to: Adrianna Ranger, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry-Western University and Children’s Hospital-London Health Sciences Centre, Victoria Campus, London, Ontario, Canada. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Neuroimaging Highlights
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences Inc.

We present the case of a male infant diagnosed with an interhemispheric cyst and agenesis of the corpus callosum on a 15-week gestational ultrasound. He was born at term and followed with serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Figure 1a and 1b demonstrate multiloculated interhemispheric cysts with agenesis of the corpus callosum and cortical abnormalities consistent with pachygyria/polymicrogyria obtained at 37 days of age. Progressive headaches and further imaging that demonstrated expansion of the cysts necessitated a neurosurgical referral at 16 months of age. At this time, his gross and fine motor milestones were delayed (11- to 12-month stage), but the remainder of his neurological exam was normal. Given the growth observed on serial imaging (Figure 1c and 1d), his parents consented to open fenestration of the cysts.

Figure 1: (A) T1 weighted sagittal and (B) axial T2 weighted axial MRI at day 37 of life demonstrating three interhemispheric cysts to the left of midline (superior 1.6 × 1.2 cm, inferior 2.7 × 1.7 cm, anterior 0.97 × 0.88 cm) with agenesis of the corpus callosum. (C) Sagittal FIESTA and (D) axial T2 weighted MRI at 18 months of gestational age redemonstrating the interhemispheric cysts with increase in size (superior 3.7 × 3.8 cm, inferior 5.3 × 3.2 cm, anterior 3.2 × 2.0 cm). (E) Sagittal FIESTA and (F) axial T2 weighted MRI completed 14 days postoperatively demonstrating fenestration of the superior and inferior interhemispheric cysts with reduction in size and mass effect (superior 1.3 × 1.8 cm, inferior 3.7 × 2.5 cm, anterior 2.3 × 3.7 cm).

We elected to perform an open approach rather than an endoscopic approach for two main reasons. Firstly, an open approach provided us with a better ability to extensively perforate the walls of cysts than an endoscopic approach would have allowed. Secondly, we are unable to use MRI image guidance with an endoscopic approach at our centre. Image guidance provided us with an improved ability to accurately locate the deeper cysts. Overall, we felt that these advantages outweighed the less invasive advantage associated with an endoscopic approach.

The patient underwent an MRI image-guided left parasagittal craniotomy for fenestration of the multiloculated interhemispheric cyst. The superior cyst was initially accessed, and a portion of its wall resected. Its fluid appeared yellow and turbid in nature. The midline cyst was then fenestrated, demonstrating more clear fluid. The trigone of the left lateral ventricle was visualised through the inferior cyst and was successfully entered. The anterior cyst could not be safely accessed. The patient had returned to his neurological baseline by postoperative day 16 and was discharged. His postoperative MRI (Figure 1e and 1f) demonstrates a reduction in the size of the cysts fenestrated.

The superior cyst’s wall was sent for pathological analysis and its architecture consists of a collagenous structure lined by a flattened to low cuboidal epithelium (Figure 2). Nuclei are blunt oval with delicate chromatin. No squamous features are present. Microvillus-like projections are noted focally. The cyst lining expresses cytokeratins (CKCAM5.2) and S-100 protein. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) are more sparse and patchy in expression. This unusual pattern implies choroid/ependymal lineage allowing for mixed epithelial and glial features.

Figure 2: (A) the cyst wall is collagenous with a delicate lining of simple to low cuboidal cell, H&E, bar = 100 um. (B) The lining is better preserved in small clefts or folds, H&E, bar = 50 um. The lining expresses a number of proteins including: (C) Cytokeratin, immunoperoxidase, bar = 100 um, (D) S-100 protein, immunoperoxidase, bar = 100 um, E) Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), immunoperoxidase, bar = 50 um, (F) Epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), immunoperoxidase, bar = 50 um.

Interhemispheric cysts have reportedly been associated with agenesis of the corpus callosum, although the pathophysiological mechanism remains to be elucidated. Barkovich et al. classified these cysts according to morphological features on imaging, as communicating (Type I) or not communicating (Type II) with the ventricular system.Reference Barkovich, Simon and Walsh1 To our knowledge, there have been 13 previous reported cases with histological analysis available: 8 arachnoidal,Reference Cinalli, Peretta and Spennato2-Reference Zubairi, Carter and Ronen4 3 ependymalReference Cinalli, Peretta and Spennato2,Reference Moriyama, Nishida and Sonobe5,Reference Tange, Aoki, Mori, Niijima and Maeda6 and 2 choroidal epithelial.Reference Manjunatha, Kishor, Patil, Mali, Patil and Hattiholi7,Reference Solt, Deck and Baim8 Two cases of ependymal cysts expressed GFAPReference Moriyama, Nishida and Sonobe5,Reference Tange, Aoki, Mori, Niijima and Maeda6 with one additionally expressing S-100 and cytokeratine.Reference Moriyama, Nishida and Sonobe5 Other cases did not report immunohistochemistry results. Of these cases, seven were symptomatic,Reference Cinalli, Peretta and Spennato2,Reference Zubairi, Carter and Ronen4,Reference Manjunatha, Kishor, Patil, Mali, Patil and Hattiholi7,Reference Solt, Deck and Baim8 five were incidental findingsReference Cinalli, Peretta and Spennato2,Reference Moriyama, Nishida and Sonobe5,Reference Tange, Aoki, Mori, Niijima and Maeda6 and one was unspecified.Reference Lena, van Càlenberg, Genitori and Choux3 Surgical management for these lesions includes cysto-peritoneal shuntingReference Lena, van Càlenberg, Genitori and Choux3,Reference Moriyama, Nishida and Sonobe5,Reference Tange, Aoki, Mori, Niijima and Maeda6 or open cyst fenestration with either a cystoventriculostomyReference Cinalli, Peretta and Spennato2,Reference Zubairi, Carter and Ronen4 or cystocisternostomy.Reference Cinalli, Peretta and Spennato2

To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of an interhemispheric cyst and agenesis of the corpus callosum with both choroidal and ependymal histopathological features. Additionally, this case highlights the importance of continued surveillance in patients with these lesions, as they have the potential to expand or result in symptoms necessitating surgical intervention.

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

Barkovich, AJ, Simon, EM, Walsh, CA. Callosal agenesis with cyst: a better understanding and new classification. Neurology. 2001;56(2):220–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cinalli, G, Peretta, P, Spennato, P, et al. Neuroendoscopic management of interhemispheric cysts in children. Neurosurg Focus. 2007;22(2):194202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lena, G, van Càlenberg, F, Genitori, L, Choux, M. Supratentorial interhemispheric cysts associated with callosal agenesis: surgical treatment and outcome in 16 children. Childs Nerv Syst. 1995;11(10):568–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zubairi, MS, Carter, RF, Ronen, GM. A male phenotype with Aicardi syndrome. J Child Neurol. 2009;24(2):204–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moriyama, E, Nishida, A, Sonobe, H. Interhemispheric multiloculated ependymal cyst with dysgenesis of the corpus callosum: a case in a preterm fetus. Childs Nerv Syst. 2007;23(7):807–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tange, Y, Aoki, A, Mori, K, Niijima, S, Maeda, M. Interhemispheric glioependymal cyst associated with agenesis of the corpus callosum. Neurol Med Chi. 2000;40(10):536–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manjunatha, YC, Kishor, VH, Patil, PH, Mali, RV, Patil, A, Hattiholi, VV. CT And MR appearance of interhemispheric cyst with agenesis of corpus callosum-a case report. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2006;16(4):715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solt, LC, Deck, JH, Baim, RS, TerBrugge K. Interhemispheric cyst of neuroepithelial origin in association with partial agenesis of the corpus callosum: case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 1980;52(3):399403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1: (A) T1 weighted sagittal and (B) axial T2 weighted axial MRI at day 37 of life demonstrating three interhemispheric cysts to the left of midline (superior 1.6 × 1.2 cm, inferior 2.7 × 1.7 cm, anterior 0.97 × 0.88 cm) with agenesis of the corpus callosum. (C) Sagittal FIESTA and (D) axial T2 weighted MRI at 18 months of gestational age redemonstrating the interhemispheric cysts with increase in size (superior 3.7 × 3.8 cm, inferior 5.3 × 3.2 cm, anterior 3.2 × 2.0 cm). (E) Sagittal FIESTA and (F) axial T2 weighted MRI completed 14 days postoperatively demonstrating fenestration of the superior and inferior interhemispheric cysts with reduction in size and mass effect (superior 1.3 × 1.8 cm, inferior 3.7 × 2.5 cm, anterior 2.3 × 3.7 cm).

Figure 1

Figure 2: (A) the cyst wall is collagenous with a delicate lining of simple to low cuboidal cell, H&E, bar = 100 um. (B) The lining is better preserved in small clefts or folds, H&E, bar = 50 um. The lining expresses a number of proteins including: (C) Cytokeratin, immunoperoxidase, bar = 100 um, (D) S-100 protein, immunoperoxidase, bar = 100 um, E) Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), immunoperoxidase, bar = 50 um, (F) Epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), immunoperoxidase, bar = 50 um.