Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:10:27.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hemicraniectomy for Massive Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction: A Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2014

Dulka Manawadu
Affiliation:
Division of Neurology, Division of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Ahmed Quateen
Affiliation:
Division of Neurology, Division of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
J. Max Findlay*
Affiliation:
Division of Neurology, Division of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
*
Rm. 2D 102 Mackenzie Centre, University Hospital, 8440 112 Street, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2B7
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Hemicraniectomy and opening underlying dura mater permits the expansion of infarcted, swollen brain outwards, reversing dangerous intracranial pressure elevations and the risk of fatal transtentorial temporal lobe or diencephalic herniation. Recently published randomized controlled trials have proven this procedure a powerful life-saving measure in the setting of malignant middle cerebral artery infarction and allayed concerns that a reduction in mortality is accompanied by an unacceptable increase in patients suffering severe neurological impairments. Appropriate patients are relatively young, in the first five decades of life, suffering infarction of a majority of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory in either hemisphere, and decompression should be performed prior to progression to coma or two dilated, fixed pupils. Lethargy combined with midline shift and uncal herniation on neuroimaging is an appropriate trigger to consider and discuss surgical intervention. Families and, when possible, patients themselves, should be informed of the certainty of at least moderate to mild permanent deficits, and the possibility of worse. To be successful decompression must be extensive, targeting a bone flap measuring 14 cm from front to back, and extending 1 to 2 cms lateral to the midline sagittal suture to the floor of the middle cranial fossa at the level of the coronal suture. An augmentation duraplasty is mandatory.

Résumé:

RÉSUMÉ:

L'hémicrâniectomie et l'ouverture de la dure-mère sous-jacente permettent l'expansion du cerveau infarcisé et oedématié, diminuant ainsi la pression intracrânienne et le risque de hernie transtentorielle temporale ou diencéphalique fatale. Des études randomisées, contrôlées, publiées récemment ont montré que cette procédure était un outil puissant pour sauver la vie dans le contexte d'un infarctus massif du territoire de l'artère cérébrale moyenne (ACM) et dissiper la crainte qu'une diminution de la mortalité ne soit accompagnée par une augmentation inacceptable de déficits neurologiques sévères chez ces patients. Les patients qui peuvent en bénéficier sont relativement jeunes, soit dans les cinq premières décennies de vie et présentent un infarctus de la majorité du territoire de l'ACM de l'un ou l'autre hémisphère. La décompression devrait être effectuée avant que le patient ne soit dans le coma ou que ses deux pupilles ne soient dilatées et fixes. La léthargie associée à un déplacement médian et une hernie de l'uncus à la neuroimagerie sont des signaux indiquant qu'on doit envisager cette intervention et en discuter. La famille et le patient lui-même si possible devraient être informés de la certitude de déficits permanents de légers à modérés ou pire. La décompression doit être extensive pour être efficace. Le volet osseux doit mesurer 14 cm d'avant en arrière et s'étendre latéralement de 1 à 2 cm de la suture sagittale médiane jusqu'au plancher de la fosse cérébrale moyenne au niveau de la suture coronale. Une plastie durale d'augmentation est essentielle.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2008

References

1. Bounds, JV, Wiebers, DO, Whisnant, JP, Okazaki, H. Mechanisms and timing of deaths from cerebral infarction. Stroke. 1981;12: 4747.Google Scholar
2. Hacke, W, Schwab, S, Horn, M, Spranger, M, De Georgia, M, von Kummer, R. “Malignant” middle cerebral artery territory infarction: Clinical course and prognostic signs. Arch Neurol. 1996;53:30915.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Ivamoto, HS, Numoto, M, Donaghy, RM. Surgical decompression for cerebral and cerebellar infarcts. Stroke. 1974;5:36570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Robertson, SC, Lennarson, P, Hasan, DM, Traynelis, VC. Clinical course and surgical management of massive cerebral infarction. Neurosurgery. 2004;55:5562.Google Scholar
5. Rengachary, SS, Batnitzky, S, Morantz, RA, Arjunan, K, Jeffries, B. Hemicraniectomy for acute massive cerebral infarction. Neurosurgery. 1981;8:3218.Google Scholar
6. Rieke, K, Schwab, S, Krieger, D, von Kummer, R, Aschoff, A, Schuchardt, V, et al. Decompressive surgery in space-occupying hemispheric infarction: results of an open, prospective trial. Crit Care Med. 1995;23:157687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Schwab, S, Steiner, T, Aschoff, A, Schwarz, S, Steiner, HH, Jansen, O, et al. Early hemicraniectomy in patients with complete middle cerebral artery infarction. Stroke. 1998;29:188893.Google Scholar
8. Hacke, W, Schwab, S, Horn, M, Spranger, M, De Georgia, M, von Kummer, R. “malignant” middle cerebral artery infarction: clinical course and prognostic signs. Arch Neurol. 1996;53:30915.Google Scholar
9. Gupta, R, Connolly, ES, Mayer, S, Elkind, MS. Hemicraniectomy for massive middle cerebral artery territory infarction: a systematic review. Stroke. 2004;35:53943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Wijdicks, EFM. Hemicraniotomy in massive hemispheric stroke: a stark perspective on a radical procedure. Can J Neurol Sci. 2000;27:2713.Google Scholar
11. Demchuk, AM. Hemicraniectomy is a promising treatment in ischemic stroke. Can J Neurol Sci. 2000;27:2747 Google Scholar
12. Frank, JI. Hemicraniectomy and durotomy upon deterioration from infarction related swelling trial (HeaDDFIRST): first public presentation of the primary study findings. Neurology. 2003;60 Suppl 1:A426.Google Scholar
13. Juttler, E, Schwab, S, Schmiedek, P, Unterberg, A, Hennerici, M, Woitzik, J, et al. Decompressive surgery for the treatment of malignant infarction of the middle cerebral artery (DESTINY): a randomized, controlled trial. Stroke. 2007;38:251825.Google Scholar
14. Vahedi, K, Vicaut, E, Mateo, J, Kurtz, A, Orabi, M, Guichard, JP, et al. Sequential-design, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of early decompressive craniectomy in malignant middle cerebral artery infarction (DECIMAL Trial). Stroke. 2007;38:250617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Hofmeijer, J, Amelink, GJ, Algra, A, van Gijn, J, Macleod, MR, Kappelle, LJ, et al. Hemicraniectomy after middle cerebral artery infarction with life-threatening Edema trial (HAMLET). Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of decompressive surgery in space-occupying hemispheric infarction. Trials. 2006;7:29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Vahedi, K, Hofmeijer, J, Juettler, E, Vicaut, E, George, B, Algra, A, et al. Early decompressive surgery in malignant infarction of the middle cerebral artery: a pooled analysis of three randomised controlled trials. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6:21522.Google Scholar
17. van Swieten, JC, Koudstaal, PJ, Visser, MC, Schouten, HJ, van Gijn, J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1988;19(5):6047.Google Scholar
18. Foerch, C, Lang, JM, Krause, J, Raabe, A, Sitzer, M, Seifert, V, et al. Functional impairment, disability and quality of life outcome after decompressive hemicraniectomy in malignant middle cerebral artery infarction: J Neurosurg. 2004;101:24854.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Curry, WT, Sethi, MK, Ogilvy, CS, Carter, BS. Factors associated with outcome after hemicraniectomy for large middle cerebral artery territory infarction. Neurosurgery. 2005;56:68192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Pillai, A, Menon, SK, Kumar, S, Rajeev, K, Kumar, A, Panikar, D. Decompressive hemicraniectomy in malignant middle cerebral artery infarction: an analysis of long-term outcome and factors in patient selection. J Neurosurg. 2007;106:5965.Google Scholar
21. Oppenheim, C, Samson, Y, Manai, R, Vandamme, X, Crozier, S, Cornu, P, et al. Prediction of malignant middle cerebral artery infarction by diffusion-weighted imaging. Stroke. 2000;31: 217581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Neumann-Haefelin, T, Sitzer, M, du Mesnil de Rochemont, R, Lanfermann, H. Prediction of malignant MCA infarction with DWI: pitfalls in hyperacute stroke. Stroke. 2001;32:5803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Kasner, SE, Demchuk, AM, Berrouschot, J, Schmutzhard, E, Harms, L, Verro, P, et al. Predictors of fatal brain edema in massive hemispheric ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2001;32:211723.Google Scholar
24. Haring, HP, Dilitz, E, Pallua, A, Hessenberger, G, Kampfl, A, Pfausler, B, et al. Attenuated corticomedullary contrast: an early cerebral computed tomography sign indicating malignant middle cerebral artery infarction. A case-control study. Stroke. 1999;30:107682.Google Scholar
25. Berrouschot, J, Barthel, H, von Kummer, R, Knapp, WH, Hesse, S, Schneider, D. 99m technetium-ethyl-cysteinate-dimer singlephoton emission CT can predict fatal ischemic brain edema. Stroke. 1998;29:255662.Google Scholar
26. Forsting, M, Reith, W, Schäbitz, WR, Heiland, S, von Kummer, R, Hacke, W, et al. Decompressive craniectomy for cerebral infarction: an experimental study in rats. Stroke. 1995;26: 25964.Google Scholar
27. Doerfler, A, Forsting, M, Reith, W, Staff, C, Heiland, S, Schäbitz, WR, et al. Decompressive craniectomy in a rat model of “malignant” cerebral hemispheric stroke: experimental support for an aggressive therapeutic approach. J Neurosurg. 1996;85:8539.Google Scholar
28. Mitchell, P, Tseng, M, Mendelow, AD. Decompressive craniectomy with lattice duraplasty. Technical note. Acta Neurochir(Wien). 2004;146:15960.Google ScholarPubMed
29. Holland, M, Nakaji, P. Craniectomy: surgical indications and technique. Operative techniques in neurosurgery. 2004;7:1015.Google Scholar
30. Schneck, MJ, Origitano, TC. Hemicraniectomy and durotomy for malignant middle cerebral artery infarction. Neurol Clin. 2006;24:71527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31. Hutchinson, P, Timofeez, I, Kirkpatrick, P. Surgery for brain edema. Neurosurg Focus. 2007;22:E14.Google Scholar
32. Yoo, DS, Kim, DS, Cho, KS, Huh, PW, Park, CK, Kang, JK. Ventricular pressure monitoring during bilateral decompression with dural expansion. J Neurosurg. 1999;91:9539.Google Scholar
33. Engelhorn, T, Doerfler, A, Kastrup, A, Beaulieu, C, de Crespigny, A, Forsting, M, et al. Decompressive craniectomy, reperfusion, or a combination for early treatment of acute “malignant” cerebral hemispheric stroke in rats? Potential mechanisms studied by MRI. Stroke. 1999;30:145663.Google Scholar
34. Mayer, SA. Hemicraniectomy: a second chance on life for patients with space-occupying MCA infarction. Stroke. 2007;38:24102.Google Scholar
35. Kastrau, F, Wolter, M, Huber, W, Block, F. Recovery from aphasia after hemicraniectomy for infarction of the speech-dominant hemisphere. Stroke. 2005;36:8259.Google Scholar