Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:24:45.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evidence-Based Medicine 20 Years On: A View from the Inside

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2014

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 40 , Issue 4 , July 2013 , pp. 448 - 449
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2013

References

1. Seshia, SS, Young, GB. The evidence-based medicine paradigm: where are we 20 years later? Part 1. Can J Neurol Sci. 2013;40(4):465–74.Google Scholar
2. Seshia, SS, Young, GB. The evidence-based medicine paradigm: where are we 20 years later? Part 2. Can J Neurol Sci. 2013;40(4):475–81.Google Scholar
3. Guyatt, G. Evidence-based medicine. ACP J Club. 1991;114(suppl 2):A–16.Google Scholar
4. Bastian, H, Glasziou, P, Chalmers, I. Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up? PLoS Med. 2010;7:e1000326.Google Scholar
5. Haynes, RB. Of studies, syntheses, synopses, summaries, and systems: the “5S” evolution of information services for evidence-based healthcare decisions. Evid Based Med. 2006;11:162–4.Google Scholar
6. Guyatt, G, Rennie, D, Meade, MO, et al: JAMA Evidence users’ guide to the medical literature. A manual for evidence-based clinical practice. (ed 2nd). Chicago, IL: McGraw Hill Co; 2008.Google Scholar
7. Guyatt, GH, Oxman, AD, Vist, GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:924–6.Google Scholar
8. Organizations that have endorsed or that are using GRADE - [Accessed 2013 May 14] http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/society/index.htm. Google Scholar
9. Guyatt, GH, Oxman, AD, Schunemann, HJ, et al. GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:380–2.Google Scholar
10. Balshem, H, Helfand, M, Schunemann, HJ, et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64: 401–6.Google Scholar
11. Spencer, FA, Iorio, A, You, J, et al Uncertainties in baseline risk estimates and confidence in treatment effects. BMJ. 2012;345:e7401.Google Scholar
12. Andrews, J, Guyatt, G, Oxman, AD, et al. GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
13. Treweek, S, Oxman, AD, Alderson, P, et al. Developing and evaluating communication strategies to support informed decisions and practice based on evidence (DECIDE): protocol and preliminary results. Implement Sci. 2013;8:6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Vandvik, PO, Brandt, L, Alonso-Coello, P, et al. Creating clinical practice guidelines we can trust, use and share: a new era is imminent. Chest. In press 2013.Google Scholar
15. Montori, VM, Guyatt, GH. Progress in evidence-based medicine. JAMA. 2008;300:1814–6.Google Scholar