Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-22T20:03:40.784Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Discovery, Proof and Reproof of Neurosecretion: (Speidel, 1917; Scharrer and Scharrer, 1934)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

Harvey B. Sarnat
Harvey B. Sarnat*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Seventeen years before the Scharrers demonstrated neurosecretory activity of neurons within the brains of vertebrates and invertebrates and convinced the scientific world of the existence of a neuroendocrine system, Carl Caskey Speidel (1917) had identified glandular neurons in the spinal cord of the skate, postulated a neurosecretory function, and performed experiments to prove his hypothesis. The correct conclusions that he formulated from morphologic observations were not believed by biologists until ‘proved’ by the Scharrers, who acknowledged his pioneering contributions. The Scharrers studied many species and even demonstrated neurosecretion in nemertine worms, now believed to be closely related to the ancestors of all vertebrates. Evolutionary theorists had speculated on neuroglandular function as early as 1900, and the contributions of comparative neuroanatomists to this field have resulted in a major medical advance.

Type
Historical Perspective
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , August 1983 , pp. 208 - 212
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 1983

References

Bentley, P.J., Follett, B.K. (1962). The action of the neurohypophysial and adrenocortical hormones on sodium balance in the cyclostome, Lampertafluviatilis. Gen. Comp Endocrinol, 2:329–335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dahlgren, U. (1914). On the electric motor nerve centres in the skates (Rajidae). Science, 40:862–863.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finley, K.H. (1939). The capillary beds of the paraventricular and supra-optic nuclei of the hypothalamus. J Comp Neurol, 71:1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, D.D. (1960). Hoplonemertines, myxinoids, and deuterostome origins. Nature, 188:649–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopeć, S. (1922). Studies on the necessity of the brain for the inception of insect metamorphosis. Biol Bull Woods Hole, 42:323–342.Google Scholar
Lechenault, H. (1963). Sur l’existence de cellules neurosécrétices chez les Hoplonémertes. Caractéristiques histochemiques de la neurosecretion chez les Némertes. CH Hebd Acad Paris, 256:3201–3203.Google Scholar
Le Gros Clark, W.E. (1938). The Hypothalamus. Edingburgh, Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Metcalf, M.M. (1900). Zool Jb (Abt Anat Ontog), 13:495–602.Google Scholar
Sarnat, H.B., Netsky, M.G. (1981). Evolution of the Nervous System. Second ed. Oxford Univ Press, NY, Oxford.Google Scholar
Scharrer, B. (1941a). Neursecretion. I. The nucleus preopticus of Fundulus heteroclitis L. J Comp Neurol, 74:81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharrer, B. (1941b). Neurosecretion. II. Neurosecretory cells in the central nervous system of cockroaches. J. Comp Neurol, 74:93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharrer, B. (1941c). Neurosecretion. III. The cerebral organ of the nemerteans. J Comp Neurol, 74:109–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharrer, E. (1928; 1930; 1932). Untersuchungen über das Zwischenhirn der Fische. Ztschr vergl Physiol, 7:1–38; 11:767–773; 17:491–530.Google Scholar
Scharrer, E. (1932). Secretory cells in the midbrain of the European minnow (Phoxinus laevis L.). J Comp Neurol 55:573–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharrer, E. (1933). Die Erklarung der scheinbar pathologischen Zellbilder im Nucleus supra-opticus und Nucleus paraventricularis. Ztschr ges Neurol Psychiat, 145:462–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharrer, E. (1934a). Stammt alles Kolloid im Zwischenhirn aus der Hypophyse? Frankf Ztschr Pathol, 47:134–142.Google Scholar
Scharrer, E. (1934b). Überdie Beteiligung des Zellkems an sekretorischen Vorgängen in Nervenzellen. Frankf Ztschr Pathol, 47:143–151.Google Scholar
Scharrer, E., Scharrer, B. (1939). Secretory cells within the hypothalamus. In The Hypothalamus. Assoc Res Nerv Ment Dis, V. 20, Hafner Publ Co., New York, pp. 170–194.Google Scholar
Scharrer, E., Scharrer, B. (1945). Neurosecretion. Physiol Rev, 25:171–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speidel, C.C. (1917). Gland-cells of internal secretion in the spinal cord of the skates. Thesis: Princeton University, USA.Google Scholar
Speidel, C.C. (1919). Gland-cells of internal secretion in the spinal cord of the skates. Publ 281. Carnegie Inst of Washington, DC, US.AGoogle Scholar
Speidel, C.C. (1922). Further comparative studies in other fishes of cells that are homologous to the large irregular glandular cells in the spinal cord of skates. J Comp Neurol, 34:303–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westfall, J.A., Kinnamon, J.C. (1978). A second sensory-motor-interneuron with neurosecretory granules in Hydra. J Neurocytol, 7:365–379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willmer, E.N. (1975). The possible contribution of nemertines to the problem of the phylogeny of the protochordates. Symp Zool Soc Lond, 36:319–345.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, V.B. (1940). The determination of characters at metamorphosis in Rhodnius prolixus (Hemiptera). J Exp. Biol, 17:201–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar