Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:29:19.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Decompressive Craniectomy: Contralateral Lesions and Metabolic Abnormalities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2014

F.A. Zeiler  and
M. West
F.A. Zeiler*
Affiliation:
Section of Neurosurgery, Dept of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba Section of Neurocritical Care, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
M. West
Affiliation:
Section of Neurosurgery, Dept of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba
*
*Section of Neurosurgery, University of Manitoba, Health Sciences Center, GB-1 820 Sherbrook Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3A 1R9, Canada. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

To define the incidence of new contralateral intracranial lesions following decompressive hemicraniectomy for blunt traumatic brain injury, and explore the potential association with metabolic factors that contribute to coagulopathy.

Methods:

We retrospectively reviewed the records and imaging of all patients treated with hemicraniectomy for blunt traumatic brain injury at our institution from May 2007 up to and including January 2012.

Results:

Twenty patients were identified during the time period to have undergone decompressive craniectomy for blunt head injury. The average age and Glasgow Coma Scale on presentation was 44.1 years (range: 19 – 72 years) and 6.5 (range: 3 – 14) respectively. All but one patient presented with an extra-axial hematoma as their surgical indication for craniectomy. Seven patients (35.0%) developed new contralateral lesions post-craniectomy. The average peri-operative pH, bicarbonate (HCO3) and hematocrit (HCT) levels for those with new contralateral lesions were lower than those without new lesions. Five of the seven patients (71.4%) with new lesions had abnormalities on their laboratory results that have been know to be attributable to coagulopathy, with four (57.1%) having two or more abnormal results. Eight of 13 (61.5%) patients without new lesion had laboratory abnormalites, with five (38.5%) having two or more abnormalities identified.

Conclusions:

The incidence of new contralateral lesions post-craniectomy for blunt head injury is 35.0% in our experience. There is an association between the metabolic derangements linked to trauma related coagulopathy and the formation of new lesions.

Type
Original Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , May 2014 , pp. 350 - 356
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2014

References

1.Stiver, SI. Complications of decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury. Neurosurg Focus. 2009 26(6)E7 .CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Nalbach, SV, Ropper, AE, Dunn, IF, Gormley, WB. Craniectomy-associated progressive extra-axial collections with treated hydrocephalus (CAPECTH): redefining a common complication of decompressive craniectomy. J Clin Neurosci. 2012 19 12227.Google Scholar
3.Li, X, van Holst, H, Kleiven, S. Decompressive craniectomy causes a significant strain increase in axonal fiber tracts. J Clin Neurosci. 2013 20 50913.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Takeuchi, S, Takasato, Y. Contralateral acute subdural hematoma after surgical evacuation of the initial hematoma: two case reports and review of the literature. Turk Neurosurg. 2013 23(2)2947.Google ScholarPubMed
5.Shen, J, Pan, JW, Fan, ZX, Zhou, YQ, Chen, Z, Zhan, RY. Surgery for contralateral acute epidural hematoma following acute subdural hematoma evacuation: five new cases and a short literature review. Acta Neurochir. 2013 155 33541.Google Scholar
6.Wen, L, Li, QC, Wang, SC. Contralateral haematoma secondary to decompressive craniectomy performed for severe head trauma: a descriptive study of 15 cases. Brain Inj. 2013 27(3)28692.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Yang, XF, Wen, L, Shen, F. Surgical complications secondary to decompressive craniectomy in patients with a head injury: a series of 108 consecutive cases. Acta Neurochi (Wien). 2008 150 12418.Google Scholar
8.Harhangi, BS, Kompanje, EJO, Leebeek, FWG, Maas, AIR. Coagulation disorders after traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurochi (Wien). 2008 150 16575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Maegele, M. Coagulopathy after traumatic brain injury: incidence, pathogenesis, and treatment options. Transfusion. 2013 53 28S37S(Suppl).Google Scholar
10.Salehpour, F, Bazzazi, AM, Porhomayon, J, Nader, ND. Correlation between coagulopathy and outcome in severe head trauma in neurointensive care and trauma units. J Crit Care. 2011 26 3526.Google Scholar
11.Stein, SC, Spettell, C, Young, G, Ross, SE. Delayed and progressive brain injury in closed-head trauma: radiological demonstration. Neurosurgery. 1993 32(1)2530.Google Scholar
12.Hess, JR, Brohi, K, Dutton, RP. The coagulopathy of trauma: a review of mechanisms. J Trauma. 2008 65 74854.Google Scholar
13.Lier, H, Krep, H, Schroeder, S, Stuber, F. Preconditions of hemostasis in trauma: a review. The influence of acidosis, hypocalcemia, anemia, and hypothermia on functional hemostasis in trauma. J Trauma. 2008 65 95160.Google Scholar
14.Cooper, DJ, Rosenfeld, JV, Murray, L. Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2011 364(16)1493502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Taylor, A, Butt, W, Rosenfeld, J. A randomized trial of very early decompressive craniectomy in children with traumatic brain injury and sustained intracranial hypertension. Child's Nerv Syst. 2001 17 15462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Pereyra, C, Mori, LB, Schoon, P. Decompressive craniectomy and brain death prevalence and mortality: 8-year restrospective review. Transplant Proc. 2012 44 21814.Google Scholar
17.Hutchinson, PJ, Corteen, E, Czosnyka, M. Decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injury: the randomized multicenter RESCUEicp study (www.RESCUEicp.com). Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2006 96 1720.Google Scholar
18.Sahuquillo, J, Marinez-Ricarte, F, Poca, MA. Decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injury after the DECRA trial. Where do we stand? Curr Opin Crit Care. 2013 19 1016.Google Scholar
19.Bor-Seng-Shu, E, Figueiredo, EG, Fonoff, ET, Fujimoto, Y, Panerai, RB, Teixeira, MJ. Decompressive craniectomy and head injury: brain morphometry, ICP, cerebral hemodynamics, cerebral microvascular reactivity, and neurochemistry. Neurosurg Rev. 2013 36(3)36170.Google Scholar
20.Timofeev, I, Czosnyka, M, Nortje, J. Effect of decompressive craniectomy on intracranial pressure and cerebrospinal compensation following traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2008 108 6673.Google Scholar
21.Bor-Seng-Shu, E, Figuieredo, EG, Amorim, RLO. Decompressive craniectomy: a meta-analysis of influences on intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure in the treatment of traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2012 117 58996.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Martini, WZ, Pusateri, AE, Uscilowicz, JM, Delgado, AV, Holcomb, JB. Independent contributions of hypothermia and acidosis to coagulopathy in swine. J Trauma. 2005 58 10029.Google Scholar
23.Reganon, E, Vila, V, Aznar, J. Effect of calcium ions on fibrin get formation in normal plasma. Thromb Res. 1984 35 3659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar