Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:57:23.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Critical Look at Phenytoin Use for Early Post-Traumatic Seizure Prophylaxis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2014

Sierra Debenham ,
Behzad Sabit ,
Rajeet S. Saluja ,
Julie Lamoureux ,
Paul Bajsarowicz ,
Mohammad Maleki  and
Judith Marcoux
Sierra Debenham
Affiliation:
Bringham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA
Behzad Sabit
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre
Rajeet S. Saluja
Affiliation:
Montreal Neurological Hospital, McGill University Health Centre
Julie Lamoureux
Affiliation:
Médicine Sociale et préventive, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Paul Bajsarowicz
Affiliation:
Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Mohammad Maleki
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosurgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre
Judith Marcoux*
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosurgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre
*
Department of Neurosurgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, 1650 Cedar ave, room L7-524, Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1A4, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Backround:

The American Academy of Neurology recommended using phenytoin or carbamazepine to prevent early post-traumatic seizures (PTS) in severe traumatic brain injuries (TBI). In this study, we examined the effects of using phenytoin prophylaxis on mild, moderate, and severe TBIs. There have been no studies looking at compliance rate and side effects of systematic use of phenytoin at a large population scale. The goal of this study is to determine 1) the proportion of TBI patients receiving phenytoin prophylaxis; 2) which parameters decided when to decide administer phenytoin; 3) prophylaxis efficacy and complication rate.

Methods:

We retrospectively studied all patients admitted with a TBI over a two year-period and collected the following information: age, GCS score, CT-scan Marshall grade, incidence of early PTS, incidence of phenytoin use and time delay, side effects, and incidence of over-dosage or under-dosage.

Results:

1008 patients were included. 5.4 % had early PTS, 2.3 % while on prophylaxis and 3.1% while not on prophylaxis, 1.9% before reaching the hospital and 1.2% prior to phenytoin administration while in hospital. Delay of administration was 5 hours. 64.8% received prophylaxis and physicians used positive CT scan as the primary decision-making parameter (p<.001). Compliance with guidelines was 99.7%. Adverse reactions occurred in 0.5%. Levels were drawn in 42.2% (52% therapeutic, 41% low, 7% high).

Conclusions:

Phenytoin is used according to guidelines, with CT scan being the main decision factor for its use. The frequency of early PTS rate is low and side effects are rare. However, earlier administration of phenytoin and adequate levels could further prevent early PTS.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 38 , Issue 6 , November 2011 , pp. 896 - 901
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2011

References

Ministry of Health Services and Ministry of Health Planning. Guidelines for planning brain injury services and supports in British Columbia. Victoria, BC. 2002 January. Available from: http://www.health.gov.bc.ca/library/publications/year/2002/MHABrainInjuryGuidelines.pdfGoogle Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.gov [homepage on the Internet]. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Rd. Atlanta, GA 30333, USA [updated 2011 May 5; reviewed 2010 March 8]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/tbi/TBI.htmGoogle Scholar
Agrawal, A, Timothy, J, Pandit, L, Manju, M.Post-traumatic epilepsy: an overview. Clin Neurol Neurosur. 2006;108:433–9.Google Scholar
Temkin, NR, Dikmen, SS, Wilensky, AJ, Keihm, J, Chabal, S, Winn, HR.A randomized, double-blind study of phenytoin for the prevention of post-traumatic seizures. N Engl J Med. 1990;323: 497–502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schierhout, G, Roberts, I. Anti-epileptic drugs for preventing seizures following acute traumatic brain injury. Cochrane DB Syst Rev. 2001;CD000173. Review.Google Scholar
Bao, YH, Bramlett, HM, Atkins, CM, et al.Post-traumatic seizures exacerbate histopathological damage after fluid-percussion brain injury. J Neurotraum. 2011;28:35–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiss, GH, Feeney, DM, Caveness, WF, et al.Prognostic factors for the occurrence of posttraumatic epilepsy. Arch Neurol. 1983;40: 7–10.Google Scholar
Asikainen, I, Kaste, M, Sarna, S.Early and late posttraumatic seizures in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation patients: brain injury factors causing late seizures and influence of seizures on long-term outcome. Epilepsia. 1999;40:584–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iudice, A, Murri, L.Pharmacological prophylaxis of post-traumatic epilepsy. Drugs. 2000;59:1091–9.Google Scholar
Teasell, R, Bayona, N, Lippert, C, Villamere, J, Hellings, C.Posttraumatic seizure disorder following acquired brain injury. Brain Injury. 2007;21:201–14.Google Scholar
Chang, BS, Lowenstein, DH.Practice parameter: Antiepileptic drug prophylaxis in severe traumatic brain injury: report of the quality standards subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2003;60:10–16.Google Scholar
Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines. Role of antiseizure prophylaxis following head injury. J Neurotraum. 2007;suppl 1: S83–S6.Google Scholar
Jacka, MJ, Zygun, D.Survey of management of severe head injury in Canada. Can J Neurol Sci. 2007;34(3):307–12.Google Scholar
Teasdale, G.Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: a practical scale. Lancet. 1974;13:81–4.Google Scholar
Marshall, LF, Eisenberg, HM, Jane, JA.A new classification of head injury based on computerized tomography. J Neurosurg. 1991; 75:S14–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, LF, Marshall, SB, Klauber, MR, et al.The diagnosis of head injury requires a classification based on computed axial tomography. J Neurotraum. 1992;9:S287–92.Google Scholar
Liberman, M, Mulder, DS, Lavoie, A, Sampalis, JS.Implementation of a trauma care system: evolution through evaluation. J Traum. 2004;56:1330–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Englander, J, Bushnik, T, Duong, TT, et al.Analyzing risk factors for late posttraumatic seizures: a prospective, multicenter investigation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:365–73.Google Scholar
Saboori, M, Ahmadi, J, Farajzadegan, Z.Indications for brain CT scan in patients with minor head injury. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2007;109:399–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franko, J, Kish, KJ, O’Connell, BG, Subramanian, S, Yuschak, JV.Advanced age and preinjury warfarin anticoagulation increase the risk of mortality after head trauma. J Traum. 2006;61: 107–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borczuk, P.Predictors of intracranial injury in patients with mild head trauma. Ann Emerg Med. 1995;25:731–6.Google Scholar
Schynoll, W, Overton, D, Krome, R, et al.A prospective study to identify high-yield criteria associated with acute intracranial computed tomography findings in head-injured patients. Am J Emerg Med. 1993;11:321–6.Google Scholar
Gutman, MB, Moulton, RJ, Sullivan, I, Hotz, G, Tucker, WS, Muller, PJ.Risk factors predicting operable intracranial hematomas in head injury. J Neurosurg. 1992;77:9–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grisar, T, Bottin, P, Borchgrave d’Alténa, V, et al.Prophylaxis of the epilepsies: should anti-epileptic drugs be used for preventing seizures after acute brain injury? Acta Neurol Belg. 2005;105: 5–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Khan, AA, Banerjee, A.The role of prophylactic anticonvulsants in moderate to severe head injury. Int J Emerg Med. 2010;3: 187–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darrah, SD, Chuang, J, Mohler, LM, et al.Dilantin therapy in an experimental model of traumatic brain injury: effects of limited versus daily treatment on neurological and behavioral recovery. J Neurotraum. 2011;28:43–55.Google Scholar
Hess, DR.Retrospective studies and chart reviews. Respir Care. 2004;49:1171–4.Google Scholar