Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:45:29.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conus Medullaris Syndrome as a Complication of Radioisotope Cisternography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2014

Bek-San Park
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul
Jinse Park
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Inje University Paik Hospital, Pusan, Korea
Seong-Ho Koh*
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul
Hojin Choi
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul
Hyun-Jeung Yu
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Bundang Jesaeng Hospital, Gyeonggi, South Korea
Koo-Eun Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Bundang Jesaeng Hospital, Gyeonggi, South Korea
Young Joo Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul
Kyu-Yong Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul
*
Department of Neurology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Gu-ri Hospital 249-1, Gyomun-dong, Guri-si, Gyeonggi-do, 471-701, Korea. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

Conus medullaris syndrome (CMS) is a clinical neurologic syndrome caused by a conus medullaris lesion. CMS is a heterogeneous entity with various etiologies such as trauma or a space-occupying lesion. Multiple cases of CMS following spinal anesthesia have been reported, but CMS after radioisotope (RI) cisternography has not yet been reported.

Methods:

We present four patients who developed CMS after RI cisternography.

Results:

All experienced neurological deficits such as paraparesis, sensory loss, and urinary incontinence three to four days after RI cisternography. Two showed abnormalities on lumbar magnetic resonance imaging, and three had complete symptom resolution within ten weeks.

Conclusions:

The pathomechanism of the CMS is unclear, but we hypothesize that RI neurotoxicity might be responsible. It is possible that the use of low-dose 99mTc-DTPA or an alternative diagnostic tool such as magnetic resonance cisternography could help to prevent this complication.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2012

References

1Levine, MC, Jayabalan, V.Complications of isotope cisternography. Ann Neurol. 1977;1(2):1726.Google Scholar
2Reynolds, F.Damage to the conus medullaris following spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2001;56(3):23847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Taylor, TK, Coolican, MJ.Injuries of the conus medullaris. Paraplegia. 1988;26(6):393400.Google Scholar
4Mathew, P, Todd, NV.Intradural conus and cauda equina tumours: a retrospective review of presentation, diagnosis and early outcome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993;56(1):6974.Google Scholar
5Hida, K, Iwasaki, Y, Cho, K, Imamura, H, Abe, H.Gliomas of the conus medullaris. Paraplegia. 1994;32(1):528.Google Scholar
6Sigal, R, Denys, A, Halimi, P, Shapeero, L, Doyon, D, Boudghene, F.Ventriculus terminalis of the conus medullaris: MR imaging in four patients with congenital dilatation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1991;12(4):7337.Google ScholarPubMed
7Sridhar, K, Ramamurthi, R, Vasudevan, MC.Isolated eccentric syrinx of the conus medullaris simulating a tumour. Br J Neurosurg. 1999;13(4):4235.Google Scholar
8Warder, DE, Oakes, WJ.Tethered cord syndrome: the low-lying and normally positioned conus. Neurosurgery. 1994;34(4):597600.Google Scholar
9Ohbu, S, Ishimoto, A, Honda, M, Fukuda, H, Hata, Y, Tada, S.Infarction of the conus medullaris. Eur Neurol. 1990;30(6): 3434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Waters, JH, Watson, TB, Ward, MG.Conus medullaris injury following both tetracaine and lidocaine spinal anesthesia. J Clin Anesth. 1996;8(8):6568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Van Gessel, EF, Forster, A, Gamulin, Z.Continuous spinal anesthesia: where do spinal catheters go? Anesth Analg. 1993;76(5):10047.Google Scholar
12Broadbent, CR, Maxwell, WB, Ferrie, R, Wilson, DJ, Gawne-Cain, M, Russell, R.Ability of anaesthetists to identify a marked lumbar interspace. Anaesthesia. 2000;55(11):11226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Thomson, A.Fifth Annual Report of the Committee of Collective Investigation of the Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland for the Year 1893-94. J Anat Physiol. 1894;29(Pt 1): 3560.Google Scholar
14Bom, HS, Song, HC, Kim, JY.The usefulness of 48 hour imaging in Tc-99m DTPA cisternography. Korean J Nucl Med. 1994;28(3):31316.Google Scholar
15Cooper, JF, Harbert, JC.Endotoxin as a cause of aseptic meningitis after radionuclide cisternography. J Nucl Med. 1975;16(9):80913.Google ScholarPubMed
16Barnes, B, Fish, M.Chemical meningitis as a complication of isotope cisternography. Neurology. 1972;22(1):8391.Google Scholar
17Jonas, S, Braunstein, P.Neurogenic bladder as a complication of isotope cisternography. J Nucl Med. 1972;13(10):7634.Google ScholarPubMed
18Lui, AC, Munhall, RJ, Winnie, AP, Selander, D.Baricity and the distribution of lidocaine in a spinal canal model. Can J Anaesth. 1991;38(4 Pt 1):5226.Google Scholar
19Ponto, JA.Special safety considerations in preparation of technetium Tc-99m DTPA for cerebrospinal fluid-related imaging procedures. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2008;48(3):41316.Google Scholar
20Verbruggen, AM, de Roo, MJ, Klopper, JF.Technetium-99m diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid for intrathecal administration: are we playing with fire? Eur J Nucl Med. 1994;21(3):2613.Google Scholar
21Hesslewood, SR.Adverse reaction to Tc-99 m DTPA. Eur J Nucl Med. 1993;20(6):567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Albayram, S, Kilic, F, Ozer, H, Baghaki, S, Kocer, N, Islak, C.Gadolinium-enhanced MR cisternography to evaluate dural leaks in intracranial hypotension syndrome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29(1):11621.Google Scholar