Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:24:59.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Comparative Study of b- and d-Waves of the Electroretinogram, in Frogs (Rana Catesbeiana)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

S. Molotchnikoff  and
F. Guertin-Laurin
S. Molotchnikoff*
Affiliation:
Département de Sciences biologiques, Université de Montréal
F. Guertin-Laurin
Affiliation:
Département de Sciences biologiques, Université de Montréal
*
Département de Sciences biologiques, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128, Succursale “A”, Montreal H3C 3J7 Canada.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The aim of this study was to compare the b- and d- waves of the ERG, evoked respectively by ON and OFF stimuli. The experiements were carried out on frogs. The d-wave is facilitated by light adaptation and relatively high stimulus intensity. The depth profiles of b- and dwaves are different. Aspartic acid abolished only the b-wave whereas nembutal affected the d-wave. These results suggested that b- and d-waves were produced by separate neuronal mechanisms, even though both appeared as positive deflection in the corneal ERG and were sensitive to K+ ion.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , November 1978 , pp. 389 - 395
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 1978

References

REFERENCES

Arden, G.B. and Tansley, K. (1955). The spectra] sensitivity of the purecone retina of the grey squirrel (Sciurus carotinensis leucotis). Journal of Physiology (Lond.) 127: 592–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argmington, J.C. (1974). The electro-retinogram. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Brown, K.T. (1968). The electroretinogram: its components and their origins Vision Research, 8: 633–677.Google Scholar
Burkhardt, D.W. (1970). Proximal negative response of Frog retina. Journal of Neurophysiology, 33; 405–420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cervetto, L. and MacNichol, E.F. (1972). Inactivation of horizontal cells in Turtle retina by glutamate and aspartate. Science, 178: 767–768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cervetto, L. and Piccolino, M.Synaptic transmission between photoreceptors and horizontal cells in Turtle retina. Science 183: 417–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crescitelli, F. and Sickel, W. (1968). Delayed OFF-responses recorded from isolated frog retina. Vision Research 8: 801–816.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eccles, J.C. (1946). Synaptic potentials of motor neurones. Journal of Neurophysiology, 9: 87–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faber, D.S. (1969). Analysis of the slow transretinal potentials in response to light. Thesis, State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar
Granit, R. (1935). Two types of retinae and their electrical responses to intermittent stimuli in light and dark adaptation. Journal of Physiology, (London), 85: 421–438.Google Scholar
Granit, R. (1933). The components of the retinal action potentials in mammals and their relation to the discharge in the optic nerve. Journal of Physiology, (London), 77; 207–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guertin-Laurin, F. (1977). Paralléle entre les ondes b et d de l’ERG évoquées par les stimulations photiques ON et OFF. Thése M.Sc. Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
Holnberg, K., Ohman, P. and Drey-Fert, T. (1977). ERG recordings from the retina of the river Lamprey (Lampetra Fluviatilis). Vision Research 17: 715–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karkowski, C.J. and Proenza, L.M. (1977). Relationship between Muller cell responses, a local transretinal potential and potassium flux. Journal of Neurophysiology 40: 244–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knave, B. and Persson, H.E. (1974). The effect of barbiturate on retinal functions. I. Effects on the conventional electroretino-gram of the sheep eye. Acta Physiologica. Scandinavica, 91: 53–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knave, B., Moller, B.A. and Persson, H.E. (1972). A component of the electro-retinogram. Vision Research, 12: 1669–1684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laffond, G., Brunette, J.R. and Molotchnikoff, S. (1977). Etudede la réponse “OFF” cornéenne dans l’oeil intact du lapin. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology, 12: 41–46.Google Scholar
Miller, R.F. (1973). Role of K+ in generation of b-wave of electroretinogram. Journal of Neurophysiology 36: 28–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, R.F. and Dowling, J.E. (1970). Intracellular response of the Muller (Glial) cells of mudpuppy retina: Their relation to b-waves of the electroretinogram. Journal of Neurophysiology, 33: 323–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicoll, R.A. (1978). Pentobarbital: Differential post synaptic actions on sympathetic ganglion cells. Science, 199: 451–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noell, W.K. (1953). Studies on the electro-physiology and metabolism of the retina. U.S.A.F. School of Aviation Medicine, Randolph Field, Texas.Google Scholar
Noell, W.K. (1958). Differentiation, metabolic organization and viability of the visual cell. Archives of Ophthalmology. 60: 702–733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ogden, T.E., Wylie, R. (1971). Avian retina. I. Microelectrode depth and marking studies of local ERG. Journal of Neuro-physiology, 34: 357–366.Google ScholarPubMed
Proenza, L.M. and Freeman, J.A. (1971). Light evoked extracellular potentials of the necturus retina: current source density analysis of the electroretinographic b-wave and the proximal negative response. Neuroscience Abstract, 1: 104.Google Scholar
Skoog, K.O., Welinder, E. and Nilsson, S.E.G. (1977). Responses in the human D.C. registered electroretinogram. Vision Research, 17: 409–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomita, T.Murakami, and Hashimoto, I. (1960). On the R-membrane in the frog’s eye, its localisation and relation to the retinal action potential. Journal of General Physiology, 43: 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar