Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:18:03.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Causes of Morbidity and Mortality Following Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

J. Max Findlay  and
Gail M. Deagle
J. Max Findlay*
Affiliation:
Division of Neurosurgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton.
*
Division of Neurosurgery, 2D1.02 W.C. Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre, 8440 - 112 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2B7
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

To determine the current recovery rates and causes for morbidity and mortality in patients suffering aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH).

Methods:

We reviewed a recent consecutive series of 95 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms who presented to our hospital between 1994 and 1995. When administered, active treatment consisted of early surgery for aneurysm clipping and aggressive prevention and treatment of SAH-related complications.

Results:

Eighty-eight (93%) of the patients were admitted within 24 hours of rupture. One-quarter of the patients in this series did not undergo aneurysm clipping due to poor neurological condition on presentation. Of the 75 patients initially considered for active treatment, 83% underwent surgery within 48 hours of rupture, all received nimodipine, 16% received tissue plasminogen activator to lyse subarachnoid or intraventricular clots, 40% underwent hypertensive treatment, and 7% underwent transluminal balloon angioplasty for vasospasm. At one year followup, 29% of patients had died, 7% had severe disabilities, 13% had moderate disabilities, 51% had made a good recovery, and 64% of all surviving patients had returned to their previous work status. Primary and contributing causes of death and disability, affecting 47 patients at one year, were: direct effects of the initial hemorrhage (79% of affected patients), surgical complications (13%), vasospasm (11%), rebleeding (11%) and medical complications (13%).

Conclusions:

Almost two-thirds of patients suffering aneurysm rupture make a satisfactory recovery with modern treatment. While vasospasm has become a less common cause of poor outcome following SAH, surgical complications remain an important problem.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , August 1998 , pp. 209 - 215
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 1998

References

REFERENCES

1.Drake, CG. Report of World Federation of Neurological Surgeons committee on a universal subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scale (Neurosurgical forum). J Neurosurg 1988; 68: 985–986.Google Scholar
2.Lougheed, WM, Marshall, BM. Management of aneurysms of the anterior circulation by intracranial procedures. In: Youmans, JR, ed. Neurological Surgery, Philadelphia: WB Saunders, Publisher 1973;3:731–767.Google Scholar
3.Jennett, B, Bond, M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. A practical scale. Lancet 1975; 1: 480–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Findlay, JM. Perioperative management of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Contemp Neurosurg 1995; 17: 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Findlay JM and a CNS practice guidelines review group. Current management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Guidelines from the Canadian Neurosurgical Society. Can J Neurol Sci 1997; 24: 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Robinson, MJ, Teasdale, GM. Calcium antagonists in the management of subarachnoid haemorrhage. Cerebrovasc Brain Met Rev 1990;2:205–226.Google ScholarPubMed
7.Barker, FG, Ogilvy, CS. Efficacy of prophylactic nimodipine for delayed ischemic deficit after subarachnoid hemorrhage: a metaanalysis. J Neurosurg 1996; 84: 405–414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Findlay, JM, Kassell, NF, Weir, BKA, et al. A randomized trial of intraoperative, intracisternal tissue plasminogen activator for the prevention of vasospasm. Neurosurgery 1995; 37: 168–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Sundt, TM Jr, Whisnant, JP. Subarachnoid hemorrhage from intracranial aneurysms. Surgical management and natural history of disease. N Engl J Med 1978; 299: 116–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Hijdra, A, Braakman, R, van Gijn, J, Vermeulen, M, van Crevel, H. Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: complications and outcome in a hospital population. Stroke 1987; 18: 1061–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Kassell, NF, Torner, jC, Jane, JA, and participants. The International Cooperative Study on the timing of aneurysm surgery. Part 2: Surgical results. J Neurosurg 1990; 73: 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Sarti, C, Tuomilehto, J, Salomaa, V, et al. Epidemiology of subarachnoid hemorrhage in Finland from 1983 to 1985. Stroke 1991; 22: 848–853.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Saveland, H, Hillman, J, Brandt, L, et al. Overall outcome in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a prospective study from neurosurgical units in Sweden during a 1-year period. J Neurosurg 1992; 76: 729–734.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Haley, EC Jr, Kassell, NF, Torner, JC, and the participants. The International Cooperative Study on the timing of aneurysm surgery: the North American experience. Stroke 1992; 23: 205–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Broderick, JP, Brott, TG, Duldner, JE, Tomsick, T, Leach, A. Initial and recurrent bleeding are the major causes of death following subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 1994; 25: 1342–1347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Inagawa, T, Tokuda, Y, Ohbayashi, N, Takaya, M, Moritake, K. Study of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in Izumo City, Japan. Stroke 1995;26:761–766.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Proust, F, Hannequin, D, Langlois, O, Freger, P, Creissard, P. Causes of morbidity and mortality after ruptured aneurysm surgery in a series of 230 patients: the importance of control angiography. Stroke 1995; 26: 1553–1557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Tolias, CM, Choksey, MS. Will increased awareness among physicians of the significance of sudden agonizing headache affect the outcome of subarachnoid hemorrhage? Coventry and Warwickshire Study: audit of subarachnoid hemorrhage (establishing historical controls), hypothesis, campaign layout, and cost estimation. Stroke 1996; 27: 807–812.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.van Gijn, J, Bromberg, JEC, Lindsay, KW, Hasan, D, Vermeulen, M. Definition of initial grading, specific events, and overall outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a survey. Stroke 1994; 25: 1623–1627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Ljunggren, B, Sonesson, BS, Säveland, H, Brandt, L. Cognitive impairment and adjustment in patients without neurological deficits after aneurysmal SAH and early operation. J Neurosurg 1985; 62: 673–679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Bornstein, RA, Weir, BKA, Petruk, KC, Disney, LB. Neuropsychological function in patients after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 1987;21:651–654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Vilkki, J, Hoist, P, Ohman, J, Servo, A, Heiskanen, O. Cognitive deficits related to computed tomographic findings after surgery for a ruptured intracranial aneurysm. Neurosurgery 1989; 25: 166–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Richardson, JTE. Cognitive performance following rupture and repair of intracranial aneurysm. Acta Neurol Scand 1991; 83: 110–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Ogden, JA, Mee, EW, Henning, M. A prospective study of impairment of cognition and memory and recovery after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 1993; 33: 572–587.Google ScholarPubMed
25.Hütter, B-O, Gilsbach, J-M. Which neuropsychological deficits are hidden behind a good outcome (Glasgow = I) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage? Neurosurgery 1993; 33: 999–1006.Google Scholar
26.McKenna, P, Willison, JR, Lowe, D, Neil-Dwyer, G. Cognitive outcome and quality of life one year after subarachnoid haemorrhage. Neurosurgery 1989; 24: 361–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Le Roux, PD, Elliott, JP, Downey, L, et al. Improved outcome after rupture of anterior circulation aneurysms: a retrospective 10-year review of 224 good-grade patients. J Neurosurg 1995; 83: 394–402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.Ingall, TJ, Whisnant, JP. Has there been a decline in subarachnoid hemorrhage mortality? Stroke 1989; 20: 718–724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Kassell, NF, Torner, JC, Haley, C Jr and participants. The International Cooperative Study on the timing of aneurysm surgery. Part 1: Overall management results. J Neurosurg 1990; 73: 18–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Mayberg, MR, Batjer, HH, Dacey, R, and members. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. A statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Circulation 1994;90:2592–2605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31.Stachniak, JB, Layon, AJ, Day, AL, Gallagher, J. Craniotomy for intracranial aneurysm and subarachnoid hemorrhage. Is course, cost, or outcome affected by age? Stroke 1996; 27: 276–281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32.Disney, L, Weir, B, Grade, M, and the Canadian Nimodipine Study Group. Factors influencing the outcome of aneurysm rupture in poor grade patients: a prospective series. Neurosurgery 1988; 23: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33.Kongable, GL, Lanzino, G, Germanson, TP, and participants. Gender-related differences in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 1996;84:43–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34.Guglielmi, G, Vinuela, F, Sepetka, I, Macellari, V. Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach, Part 1: Electrochemical basis, technique, and experimental results. J Neurosurg 1991,75: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35.Guglielmi, G, Vinuela, F, Dion, J, Duckwiler, G. Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach, Part 2: Preliminary clinical experience. J Neurosurg 1991; 75: 8–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36.Guglielmi, G, Vinuela, F, Duckwiler, G, et al. Endovascular treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms by electrothrombosis using electrically detachable coils. J Neurosurg 1992; 77: 515–524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37.Casasco, A, Aymard, A, Gobin, P, et al. Selective endovascular treatment of 71 intracranial aneurysms with platinum coils. J Neurosurg 1993; 79: 3–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38.Halbach, V, Higashida, R, Dowd, C, et al. The efficacy of endosaccular aneurysm occlusion in alleviating neurological deficits produced by mass effect. J Neurosurg 1994; 80: 659–666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39.Zubillaga, A, Guglielmi, G, Vinuela, F, Duckwiler, G. Endovascular occlusion of intracranial aneurysms with electrically detachable coils. Am J Neuroradiol 1994; 15: 815–820.Google Scholar
40.Mawad, M, Mawad, J, Cartwright, J, Gokaslan, Z. Long-term histopathologic changes in canine aneurysms embolized with Guglielmi detachable coils. Am J Neuroradiol 1995; 16: 7–13.Google ScholarPubMed
41.Nichols, D. Endovascular treatment of the acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysm. J Neurosurg 1995; 79: 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42.Graves, VB, Strother, CM, Duff, TA, Perl, J II. Early treatment of ruptured aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils: effect on subsequent bleeding. Neurosurgery 1995; 37: 640–648.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43.Gobin, YP, Vinuela, F, Gurian, JH, et al. Treatment of large and giant fusiform intracranial aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils. J Neurosurg 1996;84:55–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44.McDougall, CG, Halbach, W, Dowd, CF, et al. Endovascular treatment of basilar tip aneurysms using electrolytically detachable coils. J Neurosurg 1996; 84: 393–399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45.Pierot, L, Boulin, A, Castaings, L, Rey, A, Moret, J. Selective occlusion of basilar artery aneurysms using controlled detachable coils: report of 35 cases. Neurosurgery 1996; 38: 948–954.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed