Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:12:31.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Brain Region Specific Monoamine and Oxidative Changes During Restraint Stress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2014

Ausaf Ahmad*
Affiliation:
Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh Division of Pharmacology, Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India
Naila Rasheed
Affiliation:
College of Medicine, Qassim University, Buraidah, KSA Division of Pharmacology, Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India
Ghulam Md Ashraf
Affiliation:
King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Rajnish Kumar
Affiliation:
Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh
Naheed Banu
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Life Sciences, A.M. University, Aligarh
Farah Khan
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Jamia Hamdard University, New Delhi
Muneera Al-Sheeha
Affiliation:
College of Medicine, Qassim University, Buraidah, KSA
Gautam Palit
Affiliation:
Division of Pharmacology, Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India
*
Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow-226010, Uttar Pradesh, India. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background and Purpose:

Stress-induced central effects are regulated by brain neurotransmitters, glucocorticoids and oxidative processes. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the simultaneous alterations in the monoamine and antioxidant systems in selected brain regions (frontal cortex, striatum and hippocampus) at 1 hour (h) and 24h following the exposure of restraint stress (RS), to understand their initial response and possible crosstalk.

Methods and Results:

RS (150 min immobilization) significantly increased the dopamine levels in the frontal cortex and decreased them in the striatum and hippocampus, with selective increase of dopamine metabolites both in the 1h and 24h RS groups compared to control values. The serotonin and its metabolite levels were significantly increased in both time intervals, while noradrenaline levels were decreased in the frontal cortex and striatum only. The activities of superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase and the levels of lipid peroxidation were significantly increased with significant decrease of glutathione levels in the frontal cortex and striatum both in the 1h and 24h RS groups. There was no significant change in the catalase activity in any group. In the hippocampus, the glutathione levels were significantly decreased only in the 1h RS group.

Conclusions:

Our study implies that the frontal cortex and striatum are more sensitive to oxidative burden which could be related to the parallel monoamine perturbations. This provides a rational look into the simultaneous compensatory central mechanisms operating during acute stress responses which are particular to precise brain regions and may have long lasting effects on various neuropathological alterations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2012

References

1Andersen, JK.Oxidative stress in neurodegeneration: cause or consequence? Nat Med. 2004 Jul; 10 Suppl: S1825.Google Scholar
2Jankord, R, Herman, JP.Limbic regulation of hypothalamopituitary-adrenocortical function during acute and chronic stress. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2008 Dec;1148:6473.Google Scholar
3Zafir, A, Banu, N.Modulation of in vivo oxidative status by exogenous corticosterone and restraint stress in rats. Stress. 2009;12(2):16777.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Maier, SF, Ryan, SM, Barksdale, CM, Kalin, NH.Stressor controllability and the pituitary-adrenal system. Behav Neurosci. 1986 Oct;100(5):66974.Google Scholar
5Rasheed, N, Ahmad, A, Pandey, CP, Chaturvedi, RK, Lohani, M, Palit, G.Differential response of central dopaminergic system in acute and chronic unpredictable stress models in rats. Neurochem Res. 2010 Jan;35(1):2232.Google Scholar
6Fujino, K, Yoshitake, T, Inoue, O, et al.Increased serotonin release in mice frontal cortex and hippocampus induced by acute physiological stressors. Neurosci Lett. 2002 Mar 1;320(1-2): 915.Google Scholar
7Liu, J, Wang, X, Shigenaga, MK, Yeo, HC, Mori, A, Ames, BN.Immobilization stress causes oxidative damage to lipid, protein, and DNA in the brain of rats. Faseb J. 1996 Nov;10(13):15328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Perez-Nievas, BG, Garcia-Bueno, B, Caso, JR, Menchen, L, Leza, JC.Corticosterone as a marker of susceptibility to oxidative/nitrosative cerebral damage after stress exposure in rats. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2007 Jul;32(6):70311.Google Scholar
9Radak, Z, Sasvari, M, Nyakas, C, et al.Single bout of exercise eliminates the immobilization-induced oxidative stress in rat brain. Neurochem Int. 2001 Jul;39(1):338.Google Scholar
10Wrona, MZ, Dryhurst, G.Oxidation of serotonin by superoxide radical: implications to neurodegenerative brain disorders. Chem Res Toxicol. 1998 Jun;11(6):63950.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Siraki, AG, O’Brien, PJ.Prooxidant activity of free radicals derived from phenol-containing neurotransmitters. Toxicology. 2002 Aug 1;177(1):8190.Google Scholar
12Miyazaki, I, Asanuma, M.Dopaminergic neuron-specific oxidative stress caused by dopamine itself. Acta Med Okayama. 2008 Jun;62(3):14150.Google Scholar
13Rai, D, Bhatia, G, Sen, T, Palit, G.Comparative study of perturbations of peripheral markers in different stressors in rats. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2003 Dec;81(12):113946.Google Scholar
14Glowinski, J, Iversen, LL.Regional studies of catecholamines in the rat brain. I. The disposition of [3H]norepinephrine, [3H] dopamine and [3H]dopa in various regions of the brain. J Neurochem. 1966 Aug;13(8):65569.Google Scholar
15Kim, C, Speisky, MB, Kharouba, SN.Rapid and sensitive method for measuring norepinephrine, dopamine, 5-hydroxytryptamine and their major metabolites in rat brain by high-performance liquid chromatography. Differential effect of probenecid, haloperidol and yohimbine on the concentrations of biogenic amines and metabolites in various regions of rat brain. J Chromatogr. 1987 Jan 16;386:2535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Misra, HP, Fridovich, I.The role of superoxide anion in the autoxidation of epinephrine and a simple assay for superoxide dismutase. J Biol Chem. 1972 May 25;247(10):31705.Google Scholar
17Aebi, H.Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol. 1984;105:1216.Google Scholar
18Flohe, L, Gunzler, WA.Assays of glutathione peroxidase. Methods Enzymol. 1984;105:11421.Google Scholar
19Sedlak, J, Lindsay, RH.Estimation of total, protein-bound, and nonprotein sulfhydryl groups in tissue with Ellman’s reagent. Anal Biochem. 1968 Oct 24;25(1):192205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Ohkawa, H, Ohishi, N, Yagi, K.Assay for lipid peroxides in animal tissues by thiobarbituric acid reaction. Anal Biochem. 1979 Jun;95(2):3518.Google Scholar
21Lowry, OH, Rosebrough, NJ, Farr, AL, Randall, RJ.Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):26575.Google Scholar
22Pacak, K, Palkovits, M.Stressor specificity of central neuroendocrine responses: implications for stress-related disorders. Endocr Rev. 2001 Aug;22(4):50248.Google Scholar
23Hellriegel, ET, D’Mello, AP.The effect of acute, chronic and chronic intermittent stress on the central noradrenergic system. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1997 May-Jun;57(1-2):20714.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Joels, M, Karst, H, Krugers, HJ, Lucassen, PJ.Chronic stress: implications for neuronal morphology, function and neurogenesis. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2007 Aug-Sep;28(2-3): 7296.Google Scholar
25Vakalopoulos, C.Neuropharmacology of cognition and memory: a unifying theory of neuromodulator imbalance in psychiatry and amnesia. Med Hypotheses. 2006;66(2):394431.Google Scholar
26Das, A, Rai, D, Dikshit, M, Palit, G, Nath, C.Nature of stress: differential effects on brain acetylcholinesterase activity and memory in rats. Life Sci. 2005 Sep 16;77(18):2299311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27Inoue, T, Tsuchiya, K, Koyama, T.Regional changes in dopamine and serotonin activation with various intensity of physical and psychological stress in the rat brain. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1994 Dec;49(4):91120.Google Scholar
28Miura, H, Qiao, H, Ohta, T.Attenuating effects of the isolated rearing condition on increased brain serotonin and dopamine turnover elicited by novelty stress. Brain Res. 2002 Feb 1;926(1-2):1017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29Singh, VB, Onaivi, ES, Phan, TH, Boadle-Biber, MC.The increases in rat cortical and midbrain tryptophan hydroxylase activity in response to acute or repeated sound stress are blocked by bilateral lesions to the central nucleus of the amygdala. Brain Res. 1990 Oct 15;530(1):4953.Google Scholar
30Zafir, A, Banu, N.Antioxidant potential of fluoxetine in comparison to Curcuma longa in restraint-stressed rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 2007 Oct 15;572(1):2331.Google Scholar
31Sahin, E, Gumuslu, S.Alterations in brain antioxidant status, protein oxidation and lipid peroxidation in response to different stress models. Behav Brain Res. 2004 Dec 6;155(2):2418.Google Scholar
32Fridovich, I.Superoxide radical and superoxide dismutases. Annu Rev Biochem. 1995;64:97112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33Gaunt, GL, de Duve, C.Subcellular distribution of D-amino acid oxidase and catalase in rat brain. J Neurochem. 1976 Apr;26(4): 74959.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34Venarucci, D, Venarucci, V, Vallese, A, et al.Free radicals: important cause of pathologies refer to ageing. Panminerva Med. 1999 Dec;41(4):3359.Google Scholar
35Carpagnano, GE, Kharitonov, SA, Resta, O, Foschino-Barbaro, MP, Gramiccioni, E, Barnes, PJ.8-Isoprostane, a marker of oxidative stress, is increased in exhaled breath condensate of patients with obstructive sleep apnea after night and is reduced by continuous positive airway pressure therapy. Chest. 2003 Oct;124(4): 138692.Google Scholar