Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T02:31:38.273Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Brain Death and the Persistent Vegetative State: Similarities and Contrasts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

Bryan Young ,
Warren Blume  and
Abbyann Lynch
Bryan Young*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London
Warren Blume
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London
Abbyann Lynch
Affiliation:
Westminster Institute for Ethics and Human Values, University of Western Ontario, London
*
Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Victoria Hospital, 375 South St., London, Ontario, Canada N6A 4G5
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Brain death and the persistent vegetative state (PVS) share the following features: 1.) There is death of neurons in the brain; 2.) Both require an etiology which is capable of causing neuronal death. 3.) The potential for cognition is totally and permanently lost; 4.) Intensive medical support is usually withdrawn. In contrast, the diagnosis of brain death depends on death of the brainstem, while PVS implies permanent and total loss of forebrain function. While brainstem death can be diagnosed clinically, accurate prognosis in PVS requires additional investigation. Thus far, the EEG is the most specific test of neuronal function in the cerebral cortex. Brain death is equivalent to death, while PVS is not; management of the latter is more complex because of medical, social, ethical and legal factors.

Résumé:

RÉSUMÉ:

Les éléments suivants sont communs à la mort cérébrale et à l'état végétatif persistant (PVS): 1) Il y a mort neuronale dans le cerveau. 2) Les deux nécessitent une étiologie capable de causer la mort de neurones. 3) Le potentiel cognitif (individualité) est totalement et irrémédiablement perdu. 4) Les mesures d'appui médical intensives sont habituellement supprimées. Par contre, le diagnostic de mort cérébrale dépend de la mort du tronc cérébral, alors que le PVS implique une perte totale et permanente de fonction du prosencéphale; la mort du tronc cérébral peut être diagnostiquée cliniquement, tandis que pour le PVS, un pronostic exact nécessite une investigation. À date, l'EEG est l'épreuve la plus spécifique de la fonction neuronale du cortex cérébral. La mort cérébrale est équivalente à la mort, alors que le PVS ne l'est pas; la conduite à tenir dans le second cas est plus complexe à cause de facteurs médicaux, sociaux, éthiques et légaux.

Type
Editorial Review
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , November 1989 , pp. 388 - 393
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 1989

References

REFERENCES

1. Lamb, D. Brain death and ethics. Albany: SUNY Press 1985.Google Scholar
2. Pallis, C. Whole brain death reconsidered-physiological facts and philosophy. J Med Ethics 1983; 9: 32–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Guidelines for the diagnosis of brain death. Can J Neurol Sei 1987; 13: 355–358.Google Scholar
4. Pallis, C. ABC of Brainstem Death. London: British Medical Journal 1983.Google Scholar
5. Cranford, RE. The persistent vegetative state: getting the facts straight. Hastings Center Report 1988; 18: 27–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Plum, F, Posner, JB. The diagnosis of stupor and coma. Philadelphia: FA Davis 1980; 3.Google Scholar
7. Jennett, WB, Plum, F. The persistent vegetative state: a syndrome in search of a name. Lancet 1972; 1: 734–737.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Armstrong, PW, Colen, BD. From Quinlan to Jobes: the courts and the PVS patient. Hastings Center Report 1988; 18: 37–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Brierley, JB, Adams, JH, Graham, DI, et al. Neocortical death after cardiac arrest. Lancet 1971; 2: 560–565.Google ScholarPubMed
10. Dougherty, JH Jr., Rawlinson, D, Levy, DE, et al. Hypoxic-ischemic brain injury and the persistent vegetative state. Clinical and neu-ropathological correlation. Neurology 1979; 29: 591.Google Scholar
11. Ingvar, DH, Brun, A, Johansson, L, et al. Survival after severe cere-bral anoxia with destruction of the cerebral cortex: the appalic syndrome. In: Korein, S, ed. Brain Death: Interrelated Medical and Social Issues. Ann NY Acad Sei 1978; 315: 184–214.Google Scholar
12. Wolf, SM. The persistent problem of PVS. Hastings Center Report 1988; 18: 26.Google ScholarPubMed
13. Rosenberg, GA, Johmnson, SF, Brenner, RP. Recovery of cognition after prolonged vegetative state. Ann Neurol 1977; 2: 167–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Plum, F, Posner, JB. The diagnosis of stupor and coma. Philadelphia: FA Davis 1980; 340.Google Scholar
15. Shuttleworth, E. Recovery to social and economic independence from prolonged postanoxic vegetative state. Neurology 1983; 33: 372–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Teasdale, G, Jennett, B. Assessment of coma and impaired con-sciousness: a practical scale. Lancet 1974; 2: 81–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Willoughby, JO, Leach, BG. Relation of neurologic findings after cardiac arrest to outcome. Br Med J 1974; 3: 437–439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Jennett, B, Bond, M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain dam-age: a practical scale 1975; 1: 480–484.Google Scholar
19. Bates, D, Caronna, JJ, Cartlidge, NEF, et al. A prospective study of nontraumatic coma: methods and results in 310 patients. Ann Neurol 1977; 2: 211–220.Google Scholar
20. Finkelstein, S, Caronna, JJ. Outcome of coma following cardiac arrest. Neurology (Minneap) 1977; 27: 367–368.Google Scholar
21. Levy, DE, Knill-Jones, RP, Plum, F. The vegetative state and its prognosis after non-tramatic coma. Ann NY Acad Sei 1978; 315: 293–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Earnest, MP, Breckinridge, JC, Yarnell, PR, et al. Quality of survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: predictive value of early neurologic evaluation. Neurology (Minneap) 1979; 29: 56–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Snyder, BD, Loewenson, RB, Gumnit, RJ, et al. Neurologic progno-sis after cardiac arrest: II. Level of consciousness. Neurology (Minneap) 1980; 30: 52–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Levy, DE, Bates, D, Caronna, JJ, et al. Prognosis of nontraumatic coma. Ann Int Med 1981; 94: 293–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Longstreith, WT, Diehr, P, Inui, TS. Prediction of awakening after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Eng J Med 1983; 308: 1378–1382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Teasdale, G, Knill-Jones, R, Van der Slade, J. Observer variability in assessing impaired consciousness and coma. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1978; 41: 603–610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27. Skultety, FM. Clinical and experimental aspects of akinetic mutism: report of a case. Arch Neurol 1968; 19: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28. Churchland, PS, Sejnowski, TJ. Perspectives on cognitive neuro-science. Science 1988; 242: 741–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Speckmann, E-J, Elger, CE. Introduction to the neurophysiological basis of the EEG and DC potentials. In: Niedermeyer, E, Lopes da Silva, F. eds. Electroencephalography: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications and Related Fields. Baltimore, Munich: Urban and Schwarzenberg 1987; 1–14.Google Scholar
30. Binnie, CD, Prior, PF, Lloyd, DSL, et al. Electroencephalographic prediction of fatal anoxic brain damage after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Br Med J 1970; 4: 265–268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31. Bickford, RG, Dawson, B, Takeshita, H. EEG evidence of neurologic death. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1965; 18: 513–514.Google Scholar
32. Hockaday, JM, Potts, F, Epstein, E, et al. Electroencephalographic changes in acute cerebral anoxia from cardiac or respiratory arrest. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1965; 18: 575–586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33. Pampliglione, G, Harden, A. Resuscitation after cardiac arrest: prog-nostic value of early electroencephalographic findings. Lancet 1968; 1: 1261–1264.Google Scholar
34. Prior, PF. The EEG in acute cerebral anoxia. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica 1973.Google Scholar
35. Moller, M, Holm, B, Sindrup, E, et al. Electroencephalographic pre-diction of anoxic brain damage after resuscitation from cardiac arrest in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Acta Med Scand 1978; 203: 31–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36. Saunders, MG, Westmoreland, BF. The EEG in evaluation of disor-ders affecting the brain diffusely. In: Klass, D, Daly, DD, eds. Current Practice of Clinical Electroencephalography. New York: Raven Press 1979; 349–352.Google Scholar
37. Kuroiwa, Y, Celesia, GG, Clinical significance of periodic EEG pat-terns. Arch Neurol (Chic) 1980; 37: 15–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38. McCarty, GE, Marshall, DW. Transient eyelid opening associated with postanoxic EEG burst-suppression pattern. Arch Neurol 1981; 38: 754–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39. Markand, ON. EEG in diffuse encephalopathies. J Clin Neurophysiol 1984; 1: 357–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40. Krumholz, A, Stern, BJ, Weiss, HD. Outcome from coma after car-diopulmonary resuscitation: relation to seizures and myoclonus. Neurology 1988; 38: 401–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41. Gaches, J. Activites periodiques en E.E.G. Rev EEG Neurophysiol 1971; 1: 9–33.Google Scholar
42. Nilsson, BY, Olsson, Y, Sourander, P. Electroencephalographic and histopathological changes resembling Jakob-Creutzfeldt disease after transient cerebral ischemia due to cardiac arrest. Acta Neurol Scand 1972; 48: 416–426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43. Kuroiwa, Y, Celesia, GG, Chung, HD. Periodic EEG changes and status spongiosus of the cerebral cortex in anoxic encephalopathy: a necropsy case report. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1982; 45: 740–742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44. Sharbrough, FW. Nonspecific EEG patterns. In: Niedermeyer, E, Lopes de Silva, F, eds. Electroencephalography. Basic Principles, Clinical Applications and Related Fields. Baltimore: Uraban and Schwarzenberg 1987; 13: 173.Google Scholar
45. Madison, D, Niedermeyer, E. Epileptic seizures resulting from acute cerebral anoxia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1970; 33: 381–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46. Saunders, MG, Westmoreland, BF. The EEG in evaluation of disor-ders affecting the brain diffusely. In: Klass, DW, Daly, DD, eds. Current Practice of Clinical Electroencephalography. New York: Raven Press 1979; 343–379.Google Scholar
47. Young, GB, Blume, WT, Jacono, V, et al. Alpha-theta coma: critical timing of the second EEG. American EEG Society Meeting: Orlando 1985.Google Scholar
48. Austin, EJ, Wilkus, RJ, Longstreth, WT. Etiology and prognosis of alpha coma. Neurology 1988; 38: 733–777.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49. Synek, VM. Prognostically important patterns in diffuse anoxic and traumatic encephalopathies in adults. J Clin Neurophysiol 1988; 5: 161–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50. Eisen, A, Aminoff, A. Somatosensory evoked potentials. In: Aminoff, MJ, ed. Electrodiagnosis in Clinical Neurology, Second Edition. London: Churchill Livingstone 1986; 560–561.Google Scholar
51. Deutsch, G, Eisenberg, HM. Frontal blood flow changes in recovery from coma. J Cerb Blood Flow Metab 1987; 7: 29–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
52. Levy, DE, Sidtis, JJ, Rottenberg, DA, et al. Differences in cerebral blood flow and glucose utilization in vegetative versus locked-in patients. Ann Neurol 1987; 22: 673–682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
53. Shalit, MN, Beller, AJ, Feinsod, M. Clinical equivalents of cerebral oxygen consumption in coma. Neurology 1972; 20: 740–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54. Hertz, L, Schousboe, A. Ion and energy metabolism of the brain at a cellular level. Int Rev Neurobiol 1975; 18: 141–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
55. Abdel-Dayem, HM, Sadek, SA, Kouris, KM, et al. Changes in cere-bral perfusion after acute head injury: comparison of CT with Tc-99m HM-PAO SPECT. Radiology 1987; 165: 221–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
56. Edgren, E, Hedstrand, U, Nordin, M, et al. Prediction of outcome after cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med 1987; 15: 820–825.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
57. Kjos, BO, Brant-Zawadzki, M, Young, RG. Early CT findings of global central nervous system hypoperfusion. AJR 1983; 141: 1227–1232.Google Scholar
58. Capron, AM. Anencephalic donors: separate the dead from the dying. Hastings Center Report 1987; 17: 5–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
59. Copleston, F. A history of philosophy. Book II. New York: Image Books 1963; 90–115.Google Scholar
60. Brody, BA. Ethical questions raised by the persistent vegetative patient. Hastings Center Report 1988; 18: 33–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
61. Abram, MB, et al. Deciding to forgo life sustaining treatment. U.S. Government Printing Office; March 1983.Google Scholar