Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T23:59:59.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Electrophysiological Method for Examining Lumbosacral Root Compression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2018

Andrew Eisen ,
Donald Schomer  and
Calvin Melmed
Andrew Eisen*
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology and Neuro-surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
Donald Schomer
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology and Neuro-surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
Calvin Melmed
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology and Neuro-surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
*
Montreal Neurological Hospital, 3801 University St., Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2B4, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The propagation velocities and conduction times of nerve impulses responsible for muscle F-waves were measured in the proximal segments of 60 normal posterior tibial nerves and of 41 normal peroneal nerves. The results were compared with those of 25 patients having confirmed lumbosacral root compression due to disc degeneration. Using the peroneal nerve, 65 per cent of patients had a prolonged proximal conduction time; a similar abnormality was found in 56 per cent of patients when the posterior tibial nerve was studied. The yield of positive results rose to 85 per cent and 76 per cent respectively when the M- and F-latencies in given individuals were compared. It was also shown that in normal subjects the F-response has a longer latency, and slower conduction velocity than the H-reflex when both are obtained using the same stimulating and recording sites, in patients in whom the ankle jerks and H-reflexes are absent, the F-waves may still be recorded, indicating that the latter are mediated through motor fibers

Résumé

Résumé

Le temps et la vélocité de conduction proximate F ont été mesurés dans les nerfs tibiaux postérieurs normaux (60 cas) et péronéens normaux (41 cas). Ces résultats furent comparés ¿ ceux obtenus chez 25 patients montrant de façon certaine une compression des racines lombo-sacrées due à une dégénérescence discale. 65 pour cent des patients montraient un temps de conduction proximal allongé lorsque l’on faisait la mesure dans le nerf péronné; ce chiffre était de 56% lorsque le nerf tibial postérieur était utilisé. Ces résultats positifs atteignent 85% et 76% respectivement lorsque, chez un individu donné, les latences M et F étaient comparées. Nous avons aussi montré que chez les sujets normaux la réponse F a une latence plus longue, et une vélocité de conduction plus faible, que le réflexe H lorsque les deux sont mesurés au même site et avec les mêmes points de stimulation et d’enregistrement. Chez les patients sans réflexes achiléens ni réflexe H, il est encore possible d’enregistrer l’onde F, indiquant donc que celle-ci est transportée par les fibres motrices.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , May 1977 , pp. 117 - 123
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 1977

References

Deschuytere, J. and Rosselle, N. (1970). Electromyographic and neurophysiological investigation in root compression syndromes in man. Electromyography, 10, 339–340.Google ScholarPubMed
Deschuytere, J. and Rosselle, N. (1973). Diagnostic use of monosynaptic reflexes in L5 and S1 root compression. In: New Developments in Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 3, pp. 360–366, edited by Desmedt, J. E.. Karger: Basel.Google Scholar
Eisen, A. A., Woods, J F and Sherwin, A. L. (1974). Peripheral nerve function in long-term therapy with diphenylhydantoin. Neurology, (Minneapolis1). 24, 411–417 Google Scholar
Eisen, A. and Humphreys, P. (1974). The Guillain-Barré syndrome. A clinical and electrodiagnostic study of 25 cases. Archives of Neurology (Chicago), 30, 438–443.Google Scholar
Eisen, A., Schomer, D. and Melmed, C. (In press). The application of F wave measurements in the differentiation of proximal and distal upper limb entrapments, Neurology (Minneapolis).Google Scholar
Fra, L. and Bignolio, F. (1968). F and H responses elicited from muscles of the lower limb in normal subjects. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 7, 251–261.Google Scholar
Gassel, M. M. and Wiesendanger, M. (1965). Recurrent and reflex discharges in plantar muscles of the cat. Acta Phsyiologica Scandinavica, 65, 138–142.Google Scholar
Johnson, E. W. and Melvin, J. L. (1969). The value of electromyography in the management of lumbar radiculopathy Archives of Physical Medicine, 50, 720.Google Scholar
Kimura, J. (1974). F-wave velocity in the central segment of the median and ulnar nerves. A study in normals and in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Neurology (Minneapolis), 24, 539–546.Google Scholar
Kimura, J. and Butzer, J. F. (1973). F-wave conduction velocity in Guillain-Barré syndrome. Assessment of nerve segment between axilla and spinal cord. Archives of Neurology (Chicago), 32, 524–529.Google Scholar
King, D. and Ashby, P. (1976). Conduction velocity in the proximal segments of a motor nerve in the Guillian-Barré syndrome. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 39. 538–544.Google Scholar
Knuttson, B. (1961). Comparative value of electromyographic, myelographie and clinical-neurological examinations in the diagnosis of lumbar root compression syndrome. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica (Suppl.) 49, 1–135.Google Scholar
Magladery, J. W. and McDougal, D. B. (1950). Electrophysiological studies of nerve and reflex activity in normal man. 1. Identification of certain reflexes in the electromyogram and the conduction velocity of peripheral nerve fibers. Bulletin of the Johns Hopkins Hospital, 86, 265–290.Google Scholar
Malcolm, D. S. (1951). A method of measuring reflex times applied in sciatica and other conditions due to nerve-root compression. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 14, 15–24.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. F. and Feldman, R. G. (1967). Observations on the nature of the F wave in man. Neurology (Minneapolis) 17, 147–156.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. F. and Mosser, R. S. (1973). Maturation of human reflexes. Studies of electrically evoked reflexes in newborns, infants and children. In: New Developments in Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 3. pp. 294–307, edited by Desmedt, J. E.. Karger: Basel.Google Scholar
McLeod, J. G. and Wray, S. H. (1966). An experimental study of the F wave in the baboon. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Pschiatry, 29, 196–200.Google Scholar
McLeod, J. G., Walsh, J. C. Prineas, J. W. and Pollard, J. D. (1976). Acute idiopathic polyneuritis. A clinical and electrophysiological follow-up study. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 27, 145–162.Google Scholar
Miglietta, O. E. (1973). The F response after transverse myelotomy. In: New Developments in Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 3, pp. 323–327, edited by Desmedt, J. E.. Karger: Basel.Google Scholar
Panayiotopoulos, C. P. and Scarpalezos, S. (1976). Dystrophia myotonica: peripheral nerve involvement and pathogenic implications. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 27, 1–16.Google Scholar
Remington, R. D. and Schork, M. A. (1970). Statistics with application to the biological and health sciences, pp. 259–272. Prentice Hall Inc: New Jersey.Google Scholar
Renshaw, B. (1941). Influence of discharge of motorneurons upon excitation of neighbouring motorneurons. Journal of Neurophysiology, 4, 167–183.Google Scholar
Sawnhey, B. B. and Kayan, A. (1970). A study of the F wave from the facial muscles. Electromyography. 10, 287–295.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. E. and Lambert, E. H. (1960). Ulnar nerve conduction velocity and H-reflex in infants and children. Journal of Applied Phsyiology, 15. 1–9.Google Scholar
Thornk, J. (1965). Central responses to electrical activation of the peripheral nerves supplying the intrinsic hand muscle. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 28, 482–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trontelj, J. V. (1973). A study of the F response by single fiber electromyography In: New Developments in Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 3, pp. 318–322, edited by Desmedt, J. E.. Karger: Basel.Google Scholar
Trontelj, J V and Trontelj, M. (1973). F-responses of human facial muscles. A single motorneuron study Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 20, 211–222.Google ScholarPubMed
Upton, A. R. M., McComas, A. J. and Sica, R. E. P. (1971). Potentiation of ‘late’ responses evoked in muscles during effort. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 34, 699–711.Google Scholar