Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:12:45.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tubes, Cohomology with Growth Conditions and an Application to the Theta Correspondence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Stephen S. Kudla  and
John J. Millson
Stephen S. Kudla
Affiliation:
University of Maryland
John J. Millson
Affiliation:
College Park, Maryland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this paper we continue our effort [11], [12], [13], [14] to interpret geometrically the harmonic forms on certain locally symmetric spaces constructed by using the theta correspondence. The point of this paper is to prove an integral formula, Theorem 2.1, which will allow us to generalize the results obtained in the above papers to the finite volume case (the previous papers treated only the compact case). We then apply our integral formula to certain finite volume quotients of symmetric spaces of orthogonal groups. The main result obtained is Theorem 4.2 which is described below. We let (,) denote the bilinear form associated to a quadratic form with integer coefficients of signature (p, q). We assume that the fundamental group Γ ⊂ SO(p, q) of our locally symmetric space is the subgroup of the integral isometries of (,) congruent to the identity matrix modulo some integer N. We assume that N is chosen large enough so that Γ is neat (the multiplicative subgroup of C* generated by the eigenvalues of the elements of Γ has no torsion), Borel [2], 17.1 and that every element in Γ has spinor norm 1, Millson-Raghunathan [15], Proposition 4.1. These conditions are needed to ensure that our cycles Cx (see below) are orientable. The methods we will use apply also to unitary and quaternion unitary locally symmetric spaces, see [13].

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Mathematics , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , 01 February 1988 , pp. 1 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1988

References

1. Ash, A., Non-square-integrable cohomology of arithmetic groups, Duke Math. J. 47 (1980), 435–449.Google Scholar
2. Borel, A., Introduction aux groupes arithmétiques (Hermann, 1969).Google Scholar
3. Borel, A., Stable real cohomology of arithmetic groups II, Collected Papers III, Springer, 650–684.Google Scholar
4. Bott, R. and Tu., L. W., Differential forms in algebraic topology, Graduate Texts in Math. 82, Springer.Google Scholar
5. Cheeger, J. and Ebin, D. G., Comparison theorems in Riemannian geometry, North-Holland Mathematical Library. 9 (1975).Google Scholar
6. Godement, R., Théorie des faisceaux, Actualités Sci. Indust. 1252 (Hermann, Paris, 1958).Google Scholar
7. Gray, A., Comparison theorems for the volumes of tubes as generalizations of the Weyl tube formula, Topology. 21 (1982), 201–228.Google Scholar
8. Howe, R., Automorphic forms of low rank, preprint.Google Scholar
9. Johnson, D. and Millson, J., Deformation spaces associated to compact hyperbolic manifolds, to appear in Discrete Groups in Geometry and Analysis, zirkhauser, Progress in Math.Google Scholar
10. Kudla, S. and Millson, J., Harmonic differentials and closed geodesies on a Riemann surface, Invent. Math. 54(1979), 193–211.Google Scholar
11. Kudla, S. and Millson, J., Geodesic cycles and the Weil representation I; quotients of hyperbolic space and Siegel modular forms, Comp. Math. 45 (1982), 207–271.Google Scholar
12. Kudla, S. and Millson, J., The theta correspondence and harmonic forms I, Math. Ann. 274 (1986), 353–378.Google Scholar
13. Kudla, S. and Millson, J., The theta correspondence and harmonic forms II, Math. Ann. 277 (1987), 267–314.Google Scholar
14. Millson, J., Cycles and harmonic forms on locally symmetric spaces, Can. Math. Bull. 28 (1985), 3–38.Google Scholar
15. Millson, J. and Raghunathan, M. S., Geometric construction of cohomology for arithmeticgroups I, in Papers dedicated to the memory of V. K. Patodi, Indian Academy of Sciences, Bangalore 560080.Google Scholar
16. de Rham, G., Variétés differentiates, Actualités Sci. Indust. 1222b (Hermann, Paris, 1973).Google Scholar
17. Siegel, C. L., Uber die analytische théorie der quadratischen formen, Annals of Math. 36 (1935), 527–606.Google Scholar
18. Tong, Y. L. and Wang, S. P., Period integrals in non compact quotients of SU(p, 1), Duke Math. J.. 52 (1985), 649–688.Google Scholar
19. Wang, S. P, Correspondence of modular forms to cycles associated to 0(p, q), preprint.Google Scholar
20. Warner, F., Extension of the Rauch comparison theorems to submanifolds, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.. 122 (1966), 341–356 Google Scholar