Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:03:56.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Symmetries of Genus One Handlebodies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

John Kalliongis  and
Andy Miller
John Kalliongis
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics St. Louis University St. Louis, MO 63103
Andy Miller
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics University of Oklahoma Norman, OK 73019
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The symmetries of manifolds are a focal point of study in low-dimensional topology and yet, outside of some totally asymmetrical 3- and 4-manifolds, there are very few cases in which a complete classification has been attained. In this work we provide such a classification for symmetries of the orientable and nonorientable 3-dimensional handlebodies of genus one. Our classification includes a description, up to isomorphism, of all of the finite groups which can arise as symmetries on these manifolds, as well as an enumeration of the different ways in which they can arise. To be specific, we will classify the equivalence, weak equivalence and strong equivalence classes of (effective) finite group actions on the genus one handlebodies.

Keywords

57M9957S2557S30
Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Mathematics , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , 01 April 1991 , pp. 371 - 404
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1991

References

BS Bonahon, F. and Siebenmann, L.C., The classification of Seifert fibered 3-orbi-folds, London Math. Soc. Lecture Notes, 95(1987) 19–85.Google Scholar
CM Coxeter, H.S.M. and Moser, W.O.J., Generators and Relations for Discrete Groups, 4th éd., Springer- Verlag, 1980.Google Scholar
Du Dunbar, W., Fibered Orbifolds and Crystallographic Groups, Princeton University Ph.D. dissertation, 1981.Google Scholar
KM Kalliongis, J. and Miller, A., Equivalence and strong equivalence of actions on handlebodies, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc, 308(1988) 721–745.Google Scholar
Ki Kim, P.K., Cyclic actions on lens spaces, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc, 237(1978) 121–144.Google Scholar
KT Kwun, K.W. and J.L. Tollefson, Extending a PL involution of the interior of a compact manifold, Amer. J. of Math., 99(1977)995–1001.Google Scholar
Li Livesay, G.R., Involutions with two fixed points on the 3-sphere, Ann. of Math. (2), 78(1963) 582–593.Google Scholar
MMZ McCullough, D., Miller, A., and B. Zimmermann, Group actions on handlebodies, Proc London Math. Soc (to appear)Google Scholar
MS Meeks, W.H. and Scott, P., Finite group actions on 3-manifolds, Invent. Math., 86(1986) 287–346.Google Scholar
MY1 Meeks, W.H. and Yau, S.-T., The equivariant Dehn 's Lemma and Loop Theorem, Comment. Math. Helv., 56(1981)225–239.Google Scholar
MY2 Meeks, W.H. and Yau, S.-T., Group actions on R3 , in The Smith Conjecture, J. Morgan and H. Bass eds., Academic Press (1984) 167–179. Th W. Thurston, Three-manifolds with symmetry, preprint, 1982.Google Scholar
To Tollefson, J.L., Involutions on Sl x S2 and other 3-manifolds, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc, 183(1973) 138–152.Google Scholar