Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:07:57.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Projective Elements in Categories with Perfect θ-Continuous Maps

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Hans Vermeer  and
Evert Wattel
Hans Vermeer
Affiliation:
Free University, Amsterdam, Holland
Evert Wattel
Affiliation:
Free University, Amsterdam, Holland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In 1958 Gleason [6] proved the following :

THEOREM. In the category of compact Hausdorff spaces and continuous maps, the projective elements are precisely the extremally disconnected spaces.

The projective elements in many topological categories with perfect continuous functions as morphisms have been found since that time. For example: In the following categories the projective elements are precisely the extremally disconnected spaces:

  • (i) The category of Tychonov spaces and perfect continuous functions. [4] [11].

  • (ii) The category of regular spaces and perfect continuous functions. [4] [12].

  • (iii) The category of Hausdorff spaces and perfect continuous functions. [10] [1].

  • (iv) In the category of Hausdorff spaces and continuous k-maps the projective members are precisely the extremally disconnected k-spaces. [14].

In 1963 Iliadis [7] constructed for every Hausdorff space X the so called Iliadis absolute E[X], which is a maximal pre-image of X under irreducible θ-continuous maps.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Mathematics , Volume 33 , Issue 4 , 01 August 1981 , pp. 872 - 884
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1981

References

1. Banaschewski, B., Projective covers in categories of topological spaces and topological algebras, Proc. Kanpur Topology Conf. (Acad. Press, 1970), 63–91.Google Scholar
2. Berri, M. P., Porter, J. R. and Stephenson, R. M. Jr., A survey of minimal Hausdorff spaces, Proc. Kanpur Top. Conf. (Acad. Press, 1970), 93–114.Google Scholar
3. Dickmann, R. F. Jr. and Porter, J. R., 6-closed subsets of Hausdorff spaces, Pacific Journal of Mathematics 59 (1975), 407–415.Google Scholar
4. Flachsmeyer, J., Topologische Projektivröume, Mathematische Nachrichten 26 (1963), 57–66.Google Scholar
5. Gillman, L. and Jerison, M., Rings of continuous functions (Van Nostrand, Princeton, 1960).Google Scholar
6. Gleason, A. M., Projective topological spaces, 111. J. Math. 2 (1958), 482–489.Google Scholar
7. Iliadis, S., Absolutes of Hausdorff spaces, Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 149 (1963), 22–25.Google Scholar
8. Katëtov, M., Uber H-abgeslossene und bikompakte Railme, Casopis Pest. Math. Fys. 69 (1940), 36–49.Google Scholar
9. Liu, C. T., Absolutely closed spaces, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 180 (1968), 86–104.Google Scholar
10. Mioduszewski, J. and Rudolf, L., H-closed and extremally disconnected Hausdorff spaces, Diss. Math. 66 (1969), 1–55.Google Scholar
11. Ponomarew, V. I., The absolute of a topological space, Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 149 (1963), 26.Google Scholar
12. Strauss, D. P., Extremally disconnected spaces, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 18 (1967), 305–309.Google Scholar
13. Vermeer, J., Minimal Hausdorff and compactlike spaces, Topological Structures II, (1979), Math. Centrum Amsterdam.Google Scholar
14. Wattel, E., Projective objects and k-mappings, Rapport 72 Wisk. Sem. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (1977), To appear in the Proc. Top. Conf. Beograd (1977).Google Scholar
15. Woods, R. G., A survey of absolutes of topological spaces, Topological Structures II, (1979), Math. Centrum Amsterdam.Google Scholar