Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:41:49.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prime Numbers in Short Intervals and a Generalized Vaughan Identity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

D. R. Heath-Brown*
Affiliation:
Magdalen College, Oxford, England
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Introduction. Many problems involving prime numbers depend on estimating sums of the form ΣΛ(n)f(n), for appropriate functions f(n), (here, as usual, Λ(n) is the von Mangoldt function). Three distinct general methods have been used to estimate such sums. The earliest is due to Vinogradov (see [13, Chapter 9]); the second involves zerodensity bounds for Dirichlet L–functions (see [8, Chapters 15 and 16] for example); and the third, due to Vaughan (see [12] for example) uses an arithmetical identity as will be explained later. The second and third methods are much simpler to apply than the first. On the other hand Vinogradov's technique is at least as powerful as Vaughan's and occasionally more so. In many cases Vaughan's identity yields better bounds than the use of zero–density estimates, but sometimes they are worse. The object of this paper is to present a simple extension of Vaughan's method which is essentially as powerful as any of the techniques mentioned above, to discuss its general implications, and to apply it to the proof of the following result of Huxley [4], which has previously only been within the scope of the zero density method.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1982

References

1. Gallagher, P. X., Bombieri's mean value theorem, Mathematika 15 (1968), 16.Google Scholar
2. D. R, Heath-Brown, The Pjateckiï-Sapiro prime number theorem, J. Number Theory, to appear.Google Scholar
3. Hoheisel, G., Primzahlprobleme in der Analysis, Sitz. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. 88 (1930), 311.Google Scholar
4. Huxley, M. N., On the difference between consecutive primes, Invent. Math. 15 (1972), 164170.Google Scholar
5. Huxley, M. N., The distribution of prime numbers (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1972).Google Scholar
6. Jutila, M., On a density theorem of H. L. Montgomery for L-functions, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Ser. A I (1972), No. 520.Google Scholar
7. Jutila, M., OnLinnik's constant, Math. Scand. 41 (1977), 4562.Google Scholar
8. Montgomery, H. L., Topics in multiplicative number theory (Springer, Berlin, 1971).Google Scholar
9. H.-E, Richert, Zur Abschdtzung der Riemannschen Zetafunktion in der Nahe der Vertikalen u = 1, Math. Ann. 169 (1967), 97101.Google Scholar
10. Shiu, P., A Brun-Titchmarsh theorem for multiplicative functions, J. reine angew. Math. 318 (1980), 161170.Google Scholar
11. Titchmarsh, E. C., The theory of theRiemann Zeta-function (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1951).Google Scholar
12. Vaughan, R. C., On the estimation of trigonometrical sums over primes, and related questions, Institut Mittag-Leffler, Report No. 9 (1977).Google Scholar
13. Vinogradov, I. M., The method of trigonometric sums in the theory of numbers (Interscience, London, 1954).Google Scholar