Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T16:21:05.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Polarization of Separating Invariants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Jan Draisma ,
Gregor Kemper  and
David Wehlau
Jan Draisma
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands e-mail:, [email protected]
Gregor Kemper
Affiliation:
Technische Universität München, Zentrum Mathematik - M11, 85 748 Garching, Germany e-mail:, [email protected]
David Wehlau
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Royal Military College, Kingston, ON, K7K 7B4 e-mail:, [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We prove a characteristic free version of Weyl’s theorem on polarization. Our result is an exact analogue of Weyl’s theorem, the difference being that our statement is about separating invariants rather than generating invariants. For the special case of finite group actions we introduce the concept of cheap polarization, and show that it is enough to take cheap polarizations of invariants of just one copy of a representation to obtain separating vector invariants for any number of copies. This leads to upper bounds on the number and degrees of separating vector invariants of finite groups.

Keywords

13A5014K24
Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Mathematics , Volume 60 , Issue 3 , 01 June 2008 , pp. 556 - 571
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 2008

References

[1] Bosma, W., Cannon, J. J., and Playoust, C., The Magma algebra system i: the user language. J. Symb. Comput. 24(1997), no. 3-4, 235–265.Google Scholar
[2] Derksen, H. and Kemper, G., Computational invariant theory. Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences 130, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2002.Google Scholar
[3] Kemper, G., Computing invariants of reductive groups in positive characteristic. Transform. Groups 8(2003), no. 2, 159–176.Google Scholar
[4] Knop, F., On Noether's and Weyl's bound in positive characteristic. In: Invariant Theory in All Characteristics, CRM Proc. Lecture Notes 35, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2004, pp. 175–188.Google Scholar
[5] Kraft, H. and Procesi, C., A Primer of Invariant Theory. Notes by G. Boffi, Brandeis Lecture Notes 1, 1982. Updated version (2000) available at http://www.math.unibas.ch/˜ kraft/Papers/KP-Primer.pdf. Google Scholar
[6] Losik, M., Michor, P.W., and Popov, V. L., On polarizations in invariant theory. J. Algebra 301(2006), no. 1, 406–424.Google Scholar
[7] Richman, D. R., On vector invariants over finite fields. Adv. Math. 81(1990), no. 1, 30–65.Google Scholar
[8] Richman, D. R., Invariants of finite groups over fields of characteristic p. Adv. in Math. 124(1996), no. 1, 25–48.Google Scholar
[9] Weyl, H., The Classical Groups. Their Invariants and Representations, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. 1939.Google Scholar