Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:33:10.260Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Monodromy Groups of Riemann Surfaces of Genus ≧1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Kathryn Kuiken
Kathryn Kuiken*
Affiliation:
Polytechnic Institute of New York, New York, New York
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It is well-known [5, 19] that every finite group can appear as a group of automorphisms of an algebraic Riemann surface. Hurwitz [9, 10] showed that the order of such a group can never exceed 84 (g – 1) provided that the genus g is ≧2. In fact, he showed that this bound is the best possible since groups of automorphisms of order 84 (g – 1) are obtainable for some surfaces of genus g. The problems considered by Hurwitz and others can be considered as particular cases of a more general question: Given a finite group G, what is the minimum genus of the surface for which it is a group of automorphisms? This question has been completely answered for cyclic groups by Harvey [7]. Wiman's bound 2(2g + 1), the best possible, materializes as a consequence. A further step was taken by Maclachlan who answered this question for non-cyclic Abelian groups.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Mathematics , Volume 33 , Issue 5 , 01 October 1981 , pp. 1142 - 1156
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1981

References

1. Behr, H. and Mennicke, I., A presentation of the groups PSL(2, p), Can. J. Math. 20 (1968), 1432–1438.Google Scholar
2. Carmichael, R., Groups of finite order, (Dover Publications, New York, 1956).Google Scholar
3. Coxeter, H. S. M. and Moser, W. O. J., Generators and relations for discrete groups, (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1957).Google Scholar
4. Fricke, R., Lehrbruch der Algebra, Vol. 2 (Vieweg and Son, Braunschweig, 1926).Google Scholar
5. Greenberg, L., Maximal Fuchsian groups, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 69 (1963), 569–573.Google Scholar
6. Hall, M., The theory of groups, (The Macmillan Company, New York, 1970).Google Scholar
7. Harvey, W. J., Cyclic groups of automorphisms of a compact Riemann surface, Quarterly J. Math (Oxford) 66 (1966), 86–97.Google Scholar
8. Huppert, B., Endliche Gruppen I, (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1967).Google Scholar
9. Hurwitz, A., Ueber Riemann sche Flàchen mit gegebenen Verzwergungspunkten, Math. Ann. 39 (1891), 1–61.Google Scholar
10. Hurwitz, A., Ueber Algebraische Gebilde mit eindeutigen. Transformation in sich, Math. Annalen 4–1 (1892), 403–442.Google Scholar
11. Kra, I., Automorphic forms and Kleinian groups (Benjamin, 1972).Google Scholar
12. Kuiken, K., On the monodromy groups of Riemann surfaces of genus zero, J. Alg. 59 (1979), 481–489.Google Scholar
13. Macbeath, A. M., Proceedings of the summer school in geometry and topology, Queen's College, Dundee (1961), 59–75.Google Scholar
14. Maclachlan, C., A bound for the number of automorphisms of a compact Riemann surface, J. London Math. Soc. U (1969), 265–272.Google Scholar
15. Maclachlan, C., Abelian groups of automorphisms of compact Riemann surfaces, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 15 (1969), 695–712.Google Scholar
16. Magnus, W., Braids and Riemann surfaces, Comm. P. Appl. Math. 25 (1972), 151–161.Google Scholar
17. Massey, W. S., Algebraic topology: an introduction, (Harcourt, Brace and World, 1967).Google Scholar
18. Sah, C. H., Groups related to compact Riemann surfaces, Acta Math. 123 (1969), 13–42.Google Scholar
19. Tretkoff, M., Algebraic extensions of the field of rational functions, Comm. P. Appl. Math. 24 (1971), 191–196.Google Scholar
20. Wiman, A., Uber die hyperelliptis cher curven und diejenigen von Geschecht p — 3, welche eindeutingen transformationen in sich zulassen, Bihang tie konigl, Svenska Veienkaps Akademiens Hadlingar, (Stockholm), 1895-1896.Google Scholar