Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T13:34:22.479Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Asymptotic Behavior of Induced Representations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Larry Baggett
Affiliation:
University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado
Keith F. Taylor
Affiliation:
University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper is devoted to the proof of the following theorem.

THEOREM 1.1. Let H be a closed subgroup of a connected Lie group G, let N denote the largest (closed) subgroup of H which is normal in all of G, and suppose that π is a unitary representation of H whose restriction to N is a multiple of a character χ of N. Then every matrix coefficient of the induced representation Uπ vanishes at infinity modulo the kernel of Uπ providing that the following two conditions hold:

  • i) N is almost-connected (finite modulo its connected component).

  • ii) The subgroup Hk is “regularly related” to the diagonal subgroup D in Gk for at least one integer k ≧ k0 where k0 is determined by G and H.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1982

References

1. Baggett, L. and Taylor, K., Riemann-Lebesgue subsets of Rn and representations which vanish at infinity, J. of Func. Anal. 28 (1978), 168181.Google Scholar
2. Baggett, L. and Taylor, K., A sufficient condition for complete reducibility of the regular representation, J. of Func. Anal. 34 (1979), 250265.Google Scholar
3. Howe, R. and Moore, C., Asymptotic properties of unitary representations, preprint.Google Scholar
4. Mackey, G. W., Induced representations of locally compact groups, I, Ann. of Math. 55 (1952), 101139.Google Scholar
5. Ragozin, D., Rotation invariant measure algebras on Euclidean space, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 23 (1974), 11391154.Google Scholar