Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:24:36.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A measure on the Unipotent Variety

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

James Arthur*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Suppose that G is a reductive algebraic group defined over Q. There occurs in the trace formula a remarkable distribution on G(A)1 which is supported on the unipotent set. It is defined quite concretely in terms of a certain integral over G(Q)\G(A)1. Despite its explicit description, however, this distribution is not easily expressed locally, in terms of integrals on the groups G(QV). For many applications of the trace formula, it will be essential to do this. In the present paper we shall solve the problem up to some undetermined constants.

The distribution, which we shall denote by Junip, was defined in [1] and [3] as one of a family {Jo} of distributions. It is the value at T = T0 of a certain polynomial . We shall recall the precise definition in Section 1.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1985

References

1. Arthur, J., A trace formula for reductive groups I: terms associated to classes in G(Q), Duke Math. J. 45 (1978), 911952.Google Scholar
2. Arthur, J., A trace formula for reductive groups II: applications of a truncation operator, Comp. Math. 40 (1980), 87121.Google Scholar
3. Arthur, J., The trace formula in invariant form, Ann. of Math. 114 (1981), 174.Google Scholar
4. Arthur, J., On a family of distributions obtained from Eisenstein series I: Application of the Paley-Wiener theorem, Amer. J. Math. 104 (1982), 12431288.Google Scholar
5. Arthur, J., On a family of distributions obtained from Eisenstein series II: Explicit formulas, Amer. J. Math. 704 (1982), 12891336.Google Scholar
6. Arthur, J., The local behaviour of weighted orbital integrals, in preparation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Kostant, B., The principal three-dimensional subgroup and the Betti numbers of a complex simple Lie group, Amer. J. Math. 81 (1959), 9731032.Google Scholar
8. Lusztig, G. and Spaltenstein, N., Induced unipotent classes, J. London Math. Soc. 19 (1979), 4152.Google Scholar
9. Springer, T. A. and Steinberg, R., Conjugacy classes, in Seminar on algebraic groups and related finite groups, Lecture Notes in Math. 131 (Springer-Verlag, 1970), 167266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar