Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:01:45.572Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Limit Point Criteria for Differential Equations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Don Hinton
Don Hinton*
Affiliation:
The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

For certain ordinary differential operators L of order 2n, this paper considers the problem of determining the number of linearly independent solutions of class L2[a, ∞) of the equation L(y) = λy. Of central importance is the operator

0.1

where the coefficients pi are real. For this L, classical results give that the number m of linearly independent L2[a, ∞) solutions of L(y) = λy is the same for all non-real λ, and is at least n [10, Chapter V]. When m = n, the operator L is said to be in the limit-point condition at infinity. We consider here conditions on the coefficients pi of L which imply m = n. These conditions are in the form of limitations on the growth of the coefficients.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Mathematics , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , April 1972 , pp. 293 - 305
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1972

References

1. Devinatz, A., The deficiency index of a certain class of ordinary self-adjoint differential operators (to appear in Advances in Math.).Google Scholar
2. Everitt, W. N., Integrable-square solutions of ordinary differential operators. III , Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. 14 (1963), 170–180.Google Scholar
3. Everitt, W. N., Singular differential equations I: the even order case, Math. Ann. 156 (1964), 9–24.Google Scholar
4. Everitt, W. N., Singular differential equations II: some self-adjoint even order cases, Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. 18 (1967), 13–32.Google Scholar
5. Everitt, W. N., Some positive definite differential operators, J. London Math. Soc. 43 (1968), 465–473.Google Scholar
6. Everitt, W. N., On the limit-point classification of fourth-order differential equations, J. London Math. Soc. 44 (1969), 273–281.Google Scholar
7. Everitt, W. N. and Chandhuri, J., On the square of a formally self-adjoint expression, J. London Math. Soc. 44 (1969), 661–673.Google Scholar
8. Levinson, N., Criteria for the limit-point case for 2nd-order linear differential operators, Chasopis Pchst. Math. Fys. 74 (1949), 17–20.Google Scholar
9. Naimark, M. A., Linear differential operators, Part I (Ungar, New York, 1967).Google Scholar
10. Naimark, M. A., Linear differential operators, Part II (Ungar, New York, 1968).Google Scholar
11. Titchmarsh, E. C., On the uniqueness of the Green s function associated with a second-order differential equation, Can. J. Math. 1 (1949), 191–198.Google Scholar
12. Walker, P., Asympotica of the solutions to [(ry“)’ — py’] + qy = σy,J. Differential Equations 9 (1971), 108–132.Google Scholar
13. Walker, P., Deficiency indices of fourth order singular differential operators, J. Differential Equations 9 (1971), 133–140.Google Scholar