Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dvmhs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-19T12:35:15.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Groups Generated by two Parabolic Linear Fractional Transformations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

R. C. Lyndon  and
J. L. Ullman
R. C. Lyndon
Affiliation:
The University of Michigan, Ann Arbory Michigan
J. L. Ullman
Affiliation:
The University of Michigan, Ann Arbory Michigan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We are interested in the structure of a group G of linear fractional transformations of the extended complex plane that is generated by two parabolic elements A and B, and, particularly, in the question of when such a group G is free. We shall, as usual, represent elements of G by matrices with determinant 1, which are determined up to change of sign. Two such groups G will be conjugate in the full linear fractional group, and hence isomorphic, provided they have, up to a change of sign, the same value of the invariant τ = Trace(AB) – 2. We put aside the trivial case that τ = 0, where G is abelian. In the study of these groups, two normalizations have proved convenient. Sanov (17) and Brenner (3) took the generators in the form

while Chang, Jennings, and Ree (4) took them in the form

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Mathematics , Volume 21 , 1969 , pp. 1388 - 1403
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1969

References

1. Behr, H., Uber die endliche Definierbarkeit verallgemeinerter Einheitengruppen, J. Reine Angew. Math. 211 (1962), 123–135.Google Scholar
2. Behr, H. and Mennicke, J., A presentation of the groups PSL(2, p), Can. J. Math. 20 (1968), 1432–1438.Google Scholar
3. Brenner, J. L., Quelques groupes libres de matrices, C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris 241 (1955), 1689–1691.Google Scholar
4. Chang, B., Jennings, S. A., and Ree, R., On certain matrices which generate free groups, Can. J. Math. 10 (1958), 279–284.Google Scholar
5. Ford, L. R., Automorphic functions, 2nd ed. (Chelsea, New York, 1951).Google Scholar
6. Fricke, R. and Klein, F., Vorlesungen uber die Théorie der Automorphen Functionen. I (Teubner, Leipzig, 1897).Google Scholar
7. Hirsch, K. A., Review of (1), MR 17, #824.Google Scholar
8. Ihara, Y., Algebraic curves mod p and arithmetic groups, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. Vol. 9, pp. 265–272 (Amer. Math. Soc, Providence, Rhode Island, 1968).Google Scholar
9. Knapp, A. W., Doubly generated Fuchsian groups, Michigan Math. J. 15 (1968), 289–304.Google Scholar
10. Leutbecher, A., Ùber die Heckeschen Gruppen G(\), Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg 81 (1967), 199–205.Google Scholar
11. Lyndon, R. C. and Ullman, J. L., Pairs of real 2-by-2 matrices that generate free products, Michigan Math. J. 15 (1968), 161–166.Google Scholar
12. Macbeath, A. M., Packings, free products and residually finite groups, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 59 (1963), 555–558.Google Scholar
13. Mennicke, J., On Ihara's modular group, Inventiones Math. 4 (1967), 202–228.Google Scholar
14. Neumann, B. H., Adjunction of elements to groups, J. London Math. Soc. 18 (1943), 4–11.Google Scholar
15. Ree, R., On certain pairs of matrices which do not generate a free group, Can. Math. Bull. 4 (1961), 49–52.Google Scholar
16. Rosen, D., An arithmetic characterization of the parabolic points of G(2 cos 7r/5), Proc. Glasgow Math. Assoc. 6 (1963), 88–96 Google Scholar
17. Sanov, L. N., A property of a representation of a free group, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 57 (1947), 657–659.Google Scholar