Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T13:48:28.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Grothendieck Groups of Bass Orders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Klaus W. Roggenkamp*
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montreal, Quebec
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Commutative Bass rings, which form a special class of Gorenstein rings, have been thoroughly investigated by Bass [1]. The definitions do not carry over to non-commutative rings. However, in case one deals with orders in separable algebras over fields, Bass orders can be defined. Drozd, Kiricenko, and Roïter [3] and Roïter [6] have clarified the structure of Bass orders, and they have classified them. These Bass orders play a key role in the question of the finiteness of the non-isomorphic indecomposable lattices over orders (cf. [2; 8]). We shall use the results of Drozd, Kiricenko, and Roïter [3] to compute the Grothendieck groups of Bass orders locally. Locally, the Grothendieck group of a Bass order (with the exception of one class of Bass orders) is the epimorphic image of the direct sum of the Grothendieck groups of the maximal orders containing it.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1971

References

1. Bass, H., On the ubiquity of Gorenstein rings, Math. Z. 82 (1963), 828.Google Scholar
2. Drozd, Ju. A and Roĭter, A. V., Commutative rings with a finite number of indecomposable integral representations, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 31 (1967), 783798. (Russian)Google Scholar
3. Drozd, Ju. A., Kiricenko, V. V., and Roĭter, A. V., Hereditary and Bass orders, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 31 (1967), 14151436. (Russian)Google Scholar
4. Heller, A. and Reiner, I., Grothendieck groups of orders in semisimple algebras, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 112 (1964), 344355.Google Scholar
5. Heller, A. and Reiner, I., Grothendieck groups of integral group rings, Illinois J. Math. 9 (1965), 349360.Google Scholar
6. Roĭter, A. V., An analogue of the theorem of Bass for modules of representations of noncommutative orders, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 168 (1966), 12611264. (Russian)Google Scholar
7. Roggenkamp, K. W., Grothendieck groups of hereditary orders, J. Reine Angew. Math. 235 (1969), 2940.Google Scholar
8. Roggenkamp, K. W., A necessary and sufficient condition for orders in direct sums of complete skewfields to have only finitely many non-isom orphie indecomposable representations, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 76 (1970), 130134.Google Scholar
9. Roggenkamp, K. W., Lattices over orders, Vol. II, Lecture notes in mathematics, No. 142 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 1970).Google Scholar
10. Roggenkamp, K. W., R-orders in a split algebra have finitely many non-isomorphic lattices, as soon as R has finite class number (to appear in Can. Math. Bull., 1971).Google Scholar
11. Swan, R. G., The Grothendieck ring of a finite group, Topology 2 (1963), 85110.Google Scholar