Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T14:52:44.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

General Position Properties That Characterize 3-Manifolds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

R. J. Daverman
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics University of Tennessee Knoxville, Tennessee37996-1300
D. Repovš
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics University of Tennessee Knoxville, Tennessee37996-1300
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper defines three simplicial approximation properties for maps of 2-cells and 2-spheres into spaces, each providing homotopical tameness conditions on the approximating images. These are the general position properties used in the two main results. The first shows that a resolvable generalized 3-manifold is a genuine 3- manifold if and only if it has the weakest of these approximation properties as well as a mild 3-dimensional disjoint disks condition known as the Light Map Separation Property. The second shows a resolvable generalized 3-manifold to be a 3-manifold if and only if it satisfies the strongest of these approximation properties.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1992

References

1. Ancel, F.D., The locally flat approximation of cell-like embedding relations, Ph. D Thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, (1976).Google Scholar
2. Armentrout, S., Decompositions into straight arcs and singletons, Diss. Mat. 73(1970), 539.Google Scholar
3. Armentrout, S., Cellular decompositions of 3-manifolds that yield 3-manifolds, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 107(1971).Google Scholar
4. Bing, R.H., A decomposition of E3, into points and tame arcs such that the decomposition space is topological different from E3, Ann. of Math. (2) 65(1957), 484500.Google Scholar
5. Bing, R.H., A surface is tame if its complement is 1-ULC, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 101(1961), 294305.Google Scholar
6. Bing, R.H., Point-like decompositions of E3 , Fund. Math. 50(1962), 431453.Google Scholar
7. Bredon, G.E., Generalized manifolds, revisited. In: Topology of Manifolds, (Cantrell, J.C. and Edwards, C.H., Jr., eds.), MarkhamPubl. Co., Chicago, (1970), 461469.Google Scholar
8. Brin, M.G. and McMillan, D.R., Jr., Generalized three-manifolds with zero-dimensional non-manifold set. Pacific J. Math. 97(1981), 2958.Google Scholar
9. Cannon, J.W., Taming cell-like embedding relations. In: Geometric Topology, (Glaser, L.C. and Rushing, T.B., eds.), Lecture Notes in Math., 438, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, (1975), 66118.Google Scholar
10. Cannon, J.W., The recognition problem: what is a topological manifold?, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 84(1978), 832866.Google Scholar
11. Cannon, J.W., Shrinking cell-like decompositions of manifolds. Codimension three, Ann. of Math (2) 110(1979), 83112.Google Scholar
12. Daverman, R.J., Decompositions of Manifolds, Academic Press, Orlando, FL, (1986).Google Scholar
13. Daverman, R.J., 1 -dimensionalphenomena in cell-like mappings on 3-manifolds, Pacific J. Math. 135( 1988), 269 285.Google Scholar
14. Daverman, R.J. and Repovs, D., A new shrinking theorem for 3-manifolds, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 315(1989), 219230.Google Scholar
15. Daverman, R.J. and Row, W.H., Cell-like 0-dimensional decompositions of S3 are 4-manifold factors, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 254(1979), 217236.Google Scholar
16. Edwards, R.D., The topology of manifolds and cell-like maps. In: Proc. Internat. Cong. Mathematicians, Helsinki, (1978) (Lehto, O., éd.), Acad. Sci. Fenn., Helsinki, (1980), 111127.Google Scholar
17. Fox, R.H. and Artin, E., Some wild cells and spheres in three-dimensional space, Ann. of Math. (2) 49( 1948), 979990.Google Scholar
18. Freedman, M.H., The topology offour-dimensional manifolds, J. Differential Geometry 17(1982), 357453.Google Scholar
19. Freedman, M.H. and Quinn, F., Topology of 4-Manifolds, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, (1990).Google Scholar
20. Lambert, H.W. and Sher, R.B., Pointlike 0-dimensional decompositions of S3 , Pacific J. Math. 24(1968), 511518.Google Scholar
21. McMillan, D.R., Jr., A criterion for cellularity in a manifold, Ann. of Math. (2) 79(1964), 327337.Google Scholar
22. Moore, R.L., Concerning upper semicontinuous collections of continua, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 27( 1925), 416428.Google Scholar
23. Nicholson, V.A., 7-FLG complexes are tame in 3-manifolds Gen. Topology Appl. 2(1972), 277285.Google Scholar
24. Papakyriakopolous, C.D.,(9rt Dehn 's lemma and the asphericity of knots Ann. of Math. (2) 66(1957), 126.Google Scholar
25. Quinn, F., Ends of maps III: dimensions 4 and 5, J. Differential Geometry 17(1982), 503521.Google Scholar
26. Quinn, F., An obstruction to the resolution of homology manifolds, Michigan Math. J. 34(1987), 285291.Google Scholar
27. Repovš, D., The recognition problem for topological manifolds. In Geometric and Algebraic Topology, (Torunczyk, H., Jackowski, S., and Spiez, S., eds., Banach Center Publ., 18, PWN, Warsaw, (1986), 77108.Google Scholar
28. Repovš, D., A criterion for cellularity in a topological 4-manifold, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 100(1987), 564 566.Google Scholar
29. Repovš, D. andL, R.C.âcher, A disjoint disks property for 3-manifolds, Topology Appl. 16(1983), 161170.Google Scholar
30. Starbird, M., Cell-like 0-dimensional decompositions of E3 , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 249(1979), 203215.Google Scholar
31. Thickstun, T.L., Strongly acyclic maps and homology 3-manifolds with O-dimensional singular set, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 55( 1987), 378432.Google Scholar
32. Walsh, J.J., Dimension, cohomologicaldimension, and cell-like mappings. In: Shape Theory and Geometric Topology, (Mardešić, S. and Segal, J., eds.), Lecture Notes in Math., 870, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1981. 105118.Google Scholar
33. Wilder, R.L., Topology of Manifolds, Amer. Math. Soc. Colloq. Publ., 32, Providence, R.I., (1963).Google Scholar
34. Woodruff, E.P., Decomposition spaces having arbitrarily small neighborhoods with 2-sphere boundaries, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 232(1977), 195204.Google Scholar
35. Woodruff, E.P., Decomposition spaces having arbitrarily small neighborhoods with 2-sphere boundaries II, Fund. Math. 119(1983), 185204.Google Scholar