Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:15:56.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Feichtinger Conjecture for Wavelet Frames, Gabor Frames and Frames of Translates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Marcin Bownik  and
Darrin Speegle
Marcin Bownik
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-1222, U.S.A. e-mail: [email protected]
Darrin Speegle
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Saint Louis University, 221 N. Grand Blvd., St. Louis, MO 63103, U.S.A. e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Feichtinger conjecture is considered for three special families of frames. It is shown that if a wavelet frame satisfies a certain weak regularity condition, then it can be written as the finite union of Riesz basic sequences each of which is a wavelet system. Moreover, the above is not true for general wavelet frames. It is also shown that a sup-adjoint Gabor frame can be written as the finite union of Riesz basic sequences. Finally, we show how existing techniques can be applied to determine whether frames of translates can be written as the finite union of Riesz basic sequences. We end by giving an example of a frame of translates such that any Riesz basic subsequence must consist of highly irregular translates.

Keywords

42B2542B3542C40frameRiesz basic sequencewaveletGabor systemframe of translatespaving conjecture
Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Mathematics , Volume 58 , Issue 6 , 01 December 2006 , pp. 1121 - 1143
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 2006

References

[1] Bourgain, J. and Tzafriri, L., Invertibility of “large” submatrices with applications to the geometry of Banach spaces and harmonic analysis. Israel J. Math. 57(1987), 137–224.Google Scholar
[2] Bourgain, J. and Tzafriri, L., On a problem of Kadison and Singer. J. Reine Angew. Math. 420(1991), 1–43.Google Scholar
[3] Bownik, M., Anisotropic Hardy spaces and wavelets. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 164(2003), no. 781.Google Scholar
[4] Bownik, M. and Ho, K.-P., Atomic and Molecular Decompositions of Anisotropic Triebel–Lizorkin Spaces. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. (to appear).Google Scholar
[5] Casazza, P., Christensen, O., and Kalton, N., Frames of translates. Collect. Math. 52(2001), 35–54.Google Scholar
[6] Casazza, P., Christensen, O., Lindner, A., and Vershynin, R., Frames and the Feichtinger conjecture. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 133(2005), 1025–1033.Google Scholar
[7] Casazza, P. and Vershynin, R., Kadison–Singer meets Bourgain–Tzafriri. preprint. http://www.math.missouri.edu/∽pete/pdf/kadison-singer.pdf Google Scholar
[8] Christensen, O. and Lindner, A., Decomposition of Riesz frames and wavelets into a finite union of linearly independent sets. Linear Algebra Appl. 355(2002), 147–159.Google Scholar
[9] Frazier, M. and Jawerth, B., Decomposition of Besov spaces. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 34(1985), 777–799.Google Scholar
[10] Frazier, M. and Jawerth, B., A discrete transform and decomposition of distribution spaces. J. Funct. Anal. 93(1990), 34–170.Google Scholar
[11] Frazier, M., Jawerth, B., and Weiss, G., Littlewood-Paley Theory and the Study of Function Spaces. CBMS Regional Conference Ser., #79, American Math. Society (1991).Google Scholar
[12] Gowers, W. T., A new proof of Szeméredi's theorem. Geom. Funct. Anal. 11(2001), 465–588.Google Scholar
[13] Gröchenig, K., Localized frames are finite unions of Riesz sequences. Adv. Comput. Math. 18(2003), 149–157.Google Scholar
[14] Güntürk, C. S., Approximating a bandlimited function using very coarsely quantized data: improved error estimates in sigma-delta modulation. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 17(2004), 229–242 Google Scholar
[15] Halpern, H., Kaftal, V. and Weiss, G., Matrix pavings and Laurent operators. J. Operator Theory 16(1986), 355–374.Google Scholar
[16] Jaffard, S., A density criterion for frames of complex exponentials. Michigan Math. J. 38(1991), 339–348.Google Scholar
[17] Kuipers, L. and Niederreiter, H., Uniform Distribution of Sequences. Pure and Applied Mathematics Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1974.Google Scholar
[18] Lemarié-Rieusset, P.-G., Projecteurs invariants, matrices de dilatation, ondelettes et analyses multi-résolutions. Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana 10(1994), 283–347.Google Scholar
[19] Montgomery, H. L., Ten Lectures on the Interface Between Analytic Number Theory and Harmonic Analysis. CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics 84, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1994.Google Scholar
[20] Montgomery, H. L. and Vaughan, R. C., Hilbert's inequality. J. London Math. Soc. (2) 8(1974), 73–82.Google Scholar
[21] Ron, A. and Shen, Z., Weyl–Heisenberg frames and Riesz bases in L 2(ℝ d ). Duke Math. J. 89(1997), 237–282.Google Scholar