Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T20:05:20.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bowen Measure From Heteroclinic Points

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

D. B. Killough  and
I. F. Putnam
D. B. Killough
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Physics, and Engineering, Mount Royal University, Calgary, AB T3E 6K6 email: [email protected]
I. F. Putnam
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 3R4 email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present a new construction of the entropy-maximizing, invariant probability measure on a Smale space (the Bowen measure). Our construction is based on points that are unstably equivalent to one given point, and stably equivalent to another, i.e., heteroclinic points. The spirit of the construction is similar to Bowen's construction from periodic points, though the techniques are very different. We also prove results about the growth rate of certain sets of heteroclinic points, and about the stable and unstable components of the Bowen measure. The approach we take is to prove results through direct computation for the case of a Shift of Finite type, and then use resolving factor maps to extend the results to more general Smale spaces.

Keywords

37D2037B10hyperbolic dynamicsSmale space
Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Mathematics , Volume 64 , Issue 6 , 01 December 2012 , pp. 1341 - 1358
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 2012

References

[1] Bowen, R., Markov partitions for Axiom A diffeomorphisms. Amer. J. Math. 92(1970), 725–747. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2373370 Google Scholar
[2] Bowen, R., Periodic points and measures for Axiom A diffeomorphisms. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 154(1971), 377–397.Google Scholar
[3] Bowen, R., On Axiom A diffeomorphisms. Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, 35, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1978.Google Scholar
[4] Fried, D., Finitely presented dynamical systems. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 7(1987), no. 4, 489–507.Google Scholar
[5] Katok, A. and Hasselblatt, B., Introduction to the modern theory of dynamical systems. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, 54, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.Google Scholar
[6] Lind, D. and Marcus, B., An introduction to symbolic dynamics and coding. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.Google Scholar
[7] Mendoza, L., Topological entropy of homoclinic closures. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 311(1989), 255–266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1989-0974777-0 Google Scholar
[8] Putnam, I. F., Functoriality of the C*-algebras associated with hyperbolic dynamical systems. J. London Math. Soc. 62(2000), no. 3, 873–884. http://dx.doi.org/10.1112/S002461070000140X Google Scholar
[9] Putnam, I. F., Lifting factor maps to resolving maps. Israel J. Math. 146(2005), 253–280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02773536 Google Scholar
[10] Putnam, I. F., A homology theory for Smale spaces: a summary. arxiv:0801.3294v2Google Scholar
[11] Ruelle, D., Thermodynamic formalism. The mathematical structures of classical equilibrium statistical mechanics. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, 5, Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1978.Google Scholar
[12] Ruelle, D. and Sullivan, D., Currents, flows and diffeomorphisms. Topology 14(1975), 319–327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0040-9383(75)90016-6 Google Scholar
[13] Smale, S., Differentiable dynamical systems. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 73(1967), 747–817. http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9904-1967-11798-1Google Scholar