Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T13:50:26.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Syntax of Genitives in the Maori DP

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Elizabeth Pearce
Elizabeth Pearce*
Affiliation:
Victoria University of Wellington
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article proposes an account of genitive case marking in the Maori DP which shows how the licensing requirements for genitive depend both on thematic role distinctions and on the presence of a functional projection situated immediately below D. An investigation of ordering alternations including genitives, demonstratives, adjectives, and the lexical head indicates that the FP below D is also the location of an identifying or specifying function within the DP. The label “IdentP” is proposed as a cover term for this FP projection. It is also proposed that DPs containing nominalized verbs include a head, Nmz, that has the capacity to license additional instantiations of genitive case marking.

Résumé

Résumé

Cet article propose une analyse du cas génitif dans le syntagme déterminant (DP) en maori qui montre comment les occurrences des génitifs sont sujettes, d’une part, à une distinction thématique et, d’autre part, à la présence d’une projection fonctionnelle (FP) située directement en-dessous de la tête D. L’étude des alternances dans lesquelles participent les génitifs, les démonstratifs, les adjectifs et la tête lexicale indique que le FP en-dessous de D est aussi le site d’une fonction identificationnelle ou spécifiante. L’étiquette “IdentP” est proposée comme terme pour identifier le rôle de cette projection FP. Il est en outre proposé que les DP comprenant des verbes nominalisés contiennent une tête, Nmz, qui a la capacité de légitimer des instanciations additionnelles de syntagmes génitifs.

Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 43 , Special Issue 3-4: Arguments and Structure in Austronesian Languages , December 1998 , pp. 411 - 434
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bauer, Winifred. 1993. Maori. (With Parker, William and Evans, Te Kareongawai.) London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bauer, Winifred. 1997. The Reed reference grammar of Maori. (With Parker, William, Evans, Te Kareongawai and Teepa, Te Aroha Noti.) Auckland: Reed Books.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Judy B. 1997. Demonstratives and reinforcers in Romance and Germanic languages. Lingua 102:87–113.Google Scholar
Biggs, Bruce. 1973. Let’s learn Maori. Rev. ed. Wellington: Reed Books. [1969]Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette. 1994. A phonological and morphological reanalysis of the Maori passive. Te Reo 37:29–53.Google Scholar
Brugè, Laura. 1996. Demonstrative movement in Spanish: A comparative approach. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 6.1.Google Scholar
Brugè, Laura, and Giusti, Giuliana. 1996. On demonstratives. GLOW Newsletter 36:24–25.Google Scholar
Carstairs, Andrew. 1970. Agency and possession in Maori. Ms., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, ed. Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, y, 1–52. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra. 1973. The syntax of nominalizations in Polynesian. Oceanic Linguistics 12:641–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, Sandra. 1978. Case marking and grammatical relations in Polynesian. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra, Mason, Te Haumihiata, and Milroy, J.W.. 1995. On Maori he and the uses of indefinites. The Journal of the Polynesian Society 104:429–459.Google Scholar
Clark, Ross. 1976. Aspects of Proto-Polynesian syntax. Monographs, Te Reo. Linguistic Society of New Zealand, University of Auckland.Google Scholar
Clark, Ross. 1981. Inside and outside Polynesian nominalizations. In Studies in Pacific languages and cultures in honour of Bruce Biggs, ed. Hollyman, Jim and Pawley, Andrew, 65–81. Linguistic Society of New Zealand, University of Auckland.Google Scholar
Giusti, Giuliana. 1993. La sintassi dei determinanti. Padua: UniPress.Google Scholar
Giusti, Giuliana. 1994. Enclitic articles and double definiteness: A comparative analysis of nominal structure in Romance and Germanic. The Linguistic Review 11:241–255.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth. 1968. Review of Hohepa, Patrick W., A profile generative grammar of Maori. The Journal of the Polynesian Society 77:83–99.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth, and Keyser, Samuel Jay. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, ed. Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, Samuel Jay, 53–109. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harlow, Ray. 1986. The Actor Emphatic construction of the Eastern Polynesian languages. In FOCAL I: Papers from the Fourth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, ed. Geraghty, Paul, Carrington, Lois, and Wurm, Stephen A., 297–308. Pacific Linguistics C-93, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Hohepa, Patrick W. 1969. Not in English and kore and echara in Maori. Te Reo 1:1–34.Google Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1994. Reference and proper names. Linguistic Inquiry 25:609–665.Google Scholar
Moorfield, John C. 1992. Te Māhuri. Auckland: Longman Paul.Google Scholar
Ngata, H.M. 1993. English-Maori dictionary. Wellington: Learning Media.Google Scholar
Pearce, Elizabeth. 1997. Genitive Case in the Maori DP. Wellington Working Papers in Linguistics 9:31–55.Google Scholar
Pearce, Elizabeth, and Waite, Jeffrey. 1997. Kia and ki te complementation in Maori: An unaccusative analysis. Te Reo 40:45–75.Google Scholar
Reedy, Tamati M. 1979. Complex sentence formation in Maori. Doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Ritter, Elizabeth. 1991. Two functional categories in Noun Phrases: Evidence from Modern Hebrew. In Syntax and Semantics 25, ed. Rothstein, Susan, 37–62. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of grammar, ed. Haegeman, Liliane, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Siloni, Tal. 1997. Noun phrases and nominalizations. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna. 1989. Noun phrases and clauses: Is DP analogous to IP or CP? Ms., University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Waite, Jeffrey. 1990. Another look at the Actor-Emphatic. The Journal of the Polynesian Society 99:395–413.Google Scholar
Waite, Jeffrey. 1994. Determiner phrases in Maori. Te Reo 37:55–70.Google Scholar
Waititi, Hoani R. 1985. Te Rangatahi: Advanced 2. Wellington: Government Printer.Google Scholar