Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:55:17.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Synchronic evidence of a diachronic change: Voicing and duration in French and Spanish stop-liquid clusters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Laura Colantoni  and
Jeffrey Steele
Laura Colantoni
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Jeffrey Steele
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article investigates the role that the phonetic parameters of duration and voicing play in shaping asymmetric patterns of Romance stop-liquid cluster realization. Based on acoustic analysis of experimental data from Quebec French and Argentine Spanish, we demonstrate the existence of an asymmetry in the proportional duration of the stop and a following epenthetic vowel or lateral: sonorants are shorter after voiceless stops in stop-liquid clusters. Rhotics do not participate in this process. The Spanish tap does not vary significantly in length, and the French dorsal fricative is longer in voiceless clusters. We propose that compensatory adjustments of the following sonorant are the result of the interaction of coarticulatory constraints, both universal (shorter sonorants after voiceless stops or fricatives) and language-specific (voicing in dorsal fricatives in French). Parallels are drawn between the synchronic variation attested and well-known patterns of diachronic change in Romance.

Résumé

Résumé

Le présent article examine le rôle que jouent deux paramètres phonétiques, soit la durée et le voisement, dans la réalisation asymétrique des groupes consonantiques occlusive-liquide dans les langues romanes. À partir d’une analyse acoustique de données expérimentales du français québécois et de l’espagnol argentin, nous démontrons qu’il existe une asymétrie dans la durée proportionnelle des occlusives et de certains segments qui les suivent (voyelles latérales ou épenthétiques) : les sonantes sont plus courtes après les occlusives sourdes. Les rhotiques ne participent pas à ce processus. La durée de la vibrante battue de l’espagnol ne varie pas de façon significative, et la fricative dorsale du français est plus longue lorsqu’elle fait partie d’un groupe consonantique sourd. Nous proposons que l’ajustement compensatoire des sonantes résulte de l’interaction entre des contraintes coarticulatoires tant universelle (sonantes plus courtes après occlusives ou fricatives sourdes) que propre à une seule langue (voisement des fricatives dorsales en français). Enfin, nous dégageons des parallèles entre la variation synchronique observée et certains changements diachroniques bien connus.

Keywords

consonant clustersvoicingduration adjustmentFrenchSpanishgroupes consonantiquesvoisementajustement de la duréefrançaisespagnol
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 56 , Issue 2 , July 2011 , pp. 147 - 177
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Argüello, Fanny. 1978. El dialecto zeísta en el Ecuador: Un estudio fonético y fonológico. Doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
Beddor, Patrice Speeter, Brasher, Anthony, and Narayan, Chandan. 2007. Applying perceptual methods to the study of phonetic variation and sound change. In Experimental approaches to phonology, ed. Solé, Maria-Josep, Beddor, Patrice Speeter, and Ohala, Manjari, 127–143. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beddor, Patrice Speeter. 2009. A coarticulatory path to sound change. Language 85:785–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Berg, R.J.H. 1987. Effects of durational factors on the perception of voicing in Dutch two-obstruent sequences. Journal of Phonetics 15:259–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blecua, Beatriz. 2001. Las vibrantes del español: Manifestaciones acústicas y procesos fonéticos. Doctoral dissertation, Universidad autónoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Borzone de Manrique, Ana María, and Gurlekian, Jorge. 1980. Rasgos acústicos de las consonantes oclusivas españolas. Fonoaudiológica 26:326–330.Google Scholar
Bradley, Travis. 1999. Assibilation in Ecuadorian Spanish. A phonology-phonetics account. In Formal perspectives on Romance linguistics, ed. Authier, J. Marc, Bullock, Barbara, and Reed, Lisa, 57–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browman, Catherine and Goldstein, Louis. 1989. Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology 6:201–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browman, Catherine and Goldstein, Louis. 1990. Tiers in articulatory phonology with some implications for casual speech. In Papers in laboratory phonology, vol. I: Between the grammar and the physics of speech, ed. Kingston, John and Beckman, Mary, 341–376. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browman, Catherine and Goldstein, Louis. 2001. Competing constraints on intergestural coordination and self-organization of phonological structures. Les Cahiers de l’ICP, Bulletin de la Communication Parlée 5:25–34.Google Scholar
Chen, Matthew. 1970. Vowel duration variation as a function of the voicing of consonant environment. Phonetica 22:129–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colantoni, Laura and Steele, Jeffrey. 2005a. Liquid asymmetries in French and Spanish. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 24:1–14.Google Scholar
Colantoni, Laura and Steele, Jeffrey. 2005b. Phonetically-driven epenthesis asymmetries in French and Spanish obstruent-liquid clusters. In Experimental and theoretical approaches to Romance linguistics, ed. Rubin, Edward J. and Gess, Randall S., 77–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colantoni, Laura and Steele, Jeffrey. 2007a. Voicing-dependent cluster simplification asymmetries in Spanish and French. In Segmental and prosodic issues in Romance linguistics, ed. Prieto, Pilar, Mascaro, Joan, and Solé, Maria-Josep, 109–129. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colantoni, Laura and Steele, Jeffrey. 2007b. Acquiring /R/ in context. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29:381–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, T.H. and House, A.S.. 1988. Segmental durations in connected-speech signals: Current results. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 83:1553–1573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delattre, Pierre. 1966. Studies in French and comparative phonetics. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dommelen, van Wim A. 1983. Parameter interaction in the perception of French plosives. Phonetica 40:32–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischer-Jørgensen, Eli. 1968. Voicing, tenseness, and aspiration in stop consonants with special reference to French and Danish. Annual Report of the Institute of Phonetics of the University of Copenhagen 3:136–164.Google Scholar
Fowler, Carol. 1981. A relationship between coarticulation and compensatory shortening. Phonetica 38:35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisch, Stefan, Broe, Michael, and Pierrehumbert, Janet. 1997. Similarity and phonotactics in Arabic. Rutgers Optimality Archive ROA 223-1097.Google Scholar
Gafos, Adamantos. 2002. A grammar of gestural coordination. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20:269–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guirao, Miguelina and Jurado, María Amalia García. 1991. Los perfiles acústicos y la identificación de /l/ y /r/. Revista argentina de lingüística 7:21–42.Google Scholar
Hajek, John. 1997. Universals of sound change in nasalization. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hall, Robert A. 1976. Proto-Romance phonology. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Henton, Caroline, Ladefoged, Peter, and Maddieson, Ian. 1992. Stops in the world’s languages. Phonetica 49:65–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoole, Paul. 1999. Laryngeal coarticulation: Section A. Coarticulatory investigations of the devoicing gesture. In Coarticulation: Theory, data and techniques, ed. Hardcastle, William J. and Hewlett, Nigel, 105–121. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio. 2005. The sounds of Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, Frede. 1999. A comparative study of Romance. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Jesus, Luis and Shadle, Christine. 2005. Acoustic analysis of European Portuguese uvular [x, R] and voiceless tapped alveolar [r] fricatives. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 35:27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, Patricia. 1984. Phonetic and phonological representation of stop consonant voicing. Language 60:286–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelso, J.A.S., Saltzman, E.L., and Tuller, B.. 1986. The dynamical perspective on speech production: Data and theory. Journal of Phonetics 14:29–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessinger, R.H. and Blumstein, S.. 1997. Effects of speaking rate on voice-onset time in Thai, French, and English. Journal of Phonetics 25:143–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingston, John and Diehl, Randy. 1994. Phonetic knowledge. Language 70:419–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohler, Klaus. 1984. Phonetic explanation in phonology: The feature fortis/lenis. Phonetica 41:150–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ladefoged, Peter and Maddieson, Ian. 1999. The sounds of the world’s languages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lenz, Rodolfo. 1940. El español de Chile. Biblioteca de dialectología hispanoamericana VI:79–208.Google Scholar
Léon, Pierre R. 1992. Phonétisme et prononciations du français. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar
Lewis, Anthony. 2001. Weakening of intervocalic /p,t,k/ in two Spanish dialects: Toward the quantification of lenition processes. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Lipski, John. 1994. Latin American Spanish. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Lisker, Leigh and Abramson, Arthur S.. 1964. A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word 20:384–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddieson, Ian. 1984. Patterns of sound. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malmberg, Bertil. 1965. Estudios de fonética hispánica. Madrid: CSIC (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas).Google Scholar
Martínez Celdrán, Eugenio. 1991. On the phonetic nature of the allophones /b,d,g/ in Spanish and their distinct designations. Verba 18:235–253.Google Scholar
Martínez Celdrán, Eugenio. 2008. Some chimeras of traditional Spanish phonetics. In Selected proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Laboratory approaches to Spanish Phonology, ed. Colantoni, Laura and Steele, Jeffrey, 32–46. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Martínez Celdrán, Eugenio and Planas, Ana María Fernández. 2007. Manual de fonética española. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Mendeloff, Henry. 1969. A manual of comparative Romance linguistics. Phonology and morphology. Washington D.C.: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Mendoza, E., Carballo, G., Cruz, A., Fresnada, M.D., Muñoz, J., and Marrero, V.. 2003. Temporal variability in speech segments of Spanish: Context and speaker related differences. Speech Communication 40:431–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Möbius, Bernd. 2004. Corpus-based investigations on the phonetics of consonant voicing. Folia Linguística 38:5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro Tomás, Tomás. 1970. Manual de pronunciación española. Madrid: CSIC (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas).Google Scholar
Ohala, John. 1992. What’s cognitive, what’s not, in sound change. Lingua e Stile 27:321–361.Google Scholar
Ohala, John. 1993. The origin of sound patterns in vocal tract constraints. In The Production of speech, ed. MacNeilage, Peter, 189–216. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Ohala, John. 1997. Aerodynamics of phonology. In Proceedings of the 4th Seoul International Conference in Linguistics, 92–97. Seoul: Linguistic Society of Korea.Google Scholar
O’Shaughnessy, Douglas. 1981. A study of French vowel and consonant duration. Journal of Phonetics 9:385–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Shaughnessy, Douglas. 1982. A study of French spectral patterns for synthesis. Journal of Phonetics 10:377–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 1993. Dissimilarity in Arabic verbal roots. North Eastern Linguistics Society 23:361–387.Google Scholar
Port, Robert, Al-Ani, Salman, and Maeda, Shosaku. 1980. Temporal compensation and universal phonetics. Phonetica 37:235–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quilis, Antonio. 1970. El elemento esvarabático en los grupos [PR, BR, TR … ]. In Phonétique et linguistique romanes: Mélanges offerts à M. Georges Straka, ed. Straka, G., 99–104. Strasbourg: Société de linguistique romane.Google Scholar
Quilis, Antonio. 1993. Tratado de fonología y fonética españolas. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Recasens, Daniel and Espinsoa, Aina. 2007. An electropalatographic and acoustic study of affricates and fricatives in two Catalan dialects. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 37:143–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian and Blondeau, Helen. 2007. Language change across the lifespan: hi in Montreal French. Language 83:560–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmeiser, Benjamin. 2006. On the durational variability of svarabhakti vowels in Spanish consonant clusters. Doctoral dissertation, University of California at Davis.Google Scholar
Smith, Caroline L. 1997. The devoicing of /z/ in American English: Effects of local and prosodic context. Journal of Phonetics 25:471–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snoeren, Natalie, Hallé, Pierre, and Segui, Juan. 2006. A voice for the voiceless: Production and perception of assimilated stops in French. Journal of Phonetics 34:241–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth N., Blumstein, Sheila E., Glicksman, Laura, Burton, Martha, and Kurowski, Kathleen. 1992. Acoustic and perceptual characteristics of voicing in fricatives and fricative clusters. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 91:2979–3000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straka, Georges. 1979. Contribution à l’histoire de la consonne R en français. In Les sons et les mots, ed. Straka, Georges, 465–499. Paris: Éditions Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Tousignant, Claude. 1987. Les variantes du /R/ montréalais: Contextes phonologiques favorisant leur apparition. Revue québécoise de linguistique théorique et appliquée 6:73–113.Google Scholar
Tranel, Bernard. 1987. The sounds of French. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Douglas C. 1984. The pronunciation of Canadian French. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
Walker, Douglas C. 2001. French sound structure. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh-Dickey, Laura. 1997. The phonology of liquids. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Williams, Lee. 1977. The voicing contrast in Spanish. Journal of Phonetics 5:169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wireback, Kenneth J. 1997. The role of phonological structure in sound change from Latin to Spanish and Portuguese. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar