Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:56:52.929Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Svetlana Vogeleer, Andrée Borillo, Marcel Vuillaume et Carl Vetters, dir. La modalité sous tous ses aspects. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 1999. 353 pages.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Sonia Michiels
Sonia Michiels*
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews/Comptes rendus
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , December 1999 , pp. 406 - 409
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Références

Bolzano, Bernard. 1837. Grundlegung der Logik, rééd. Kambartel, 1967.Google Scholar
Dell, François. 1973. Les règles et les sons. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Kronning, Hans. 1996. Modalité et temps: devoir + infinitif périphrase du futur. In Actes du 12e Congrès des Romanistes Scandinaves, vol. 1, sous la dir. Boysen, de G., 283–295. Aalborg.Google Scholar
Martin, Robert et Nef, Frédéric. 1981. Temps linguistique et temps logique. Langages 64:81–92.Google Scholar
Plénat, Marc. 1981. Cahiers de grammaire 3. Toulouse: Université de Toulouse-le-Mirail.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard van Orman. 1960. Le mot et la chose. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Schane, Sanford A. 1968. French phonology and morphology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 66:143–160.Google Scholar