Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:13:54.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Subject Doubling, Free Inversion, and Null Argument Languages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Yves Roberge
Yves Roberge*
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The aim of this paper is twofold. First, I shall propose a unified account of the subject doubling construction and point out its similarities and differences with respect to object doubling — the so-called clitic doubling. The discussion is based on Trentino, a northern dialect of Italian, and Colloquial French. I will argue that it is not desirable to establish a connection between subject doubling and free inversion as is implicitly assumed in Safir (1982). Rather, it seems preferable to assume that the subject clitics are generated in the AGR element of INFL and that they are associated with pro in subject position. The possibility of subject doubling is then related to a parameter making reference to the optionality of Case absorbtion or spell-out by the clitic.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , Spring 1986 , pp. 55 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borer, Hagit 1984 Parametric Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Bouchard, Denis 1982 On the Content of Empty Categories. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Brandi, Luciana, and Cordin, Patrizia 1981 On Clitics and Inflection in Some Italian Dialects. Mimeo. Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore.Google Scholar
Carroll, Susanne 1982 Redoublement et dislocations en français populaire. Pp. 291–357 in La syntaxe du français standard et populaire. Lefebvre, Claire, réd. Québec: Éditeur Officiel.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1981 Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1982 Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, and Lasnik, Howard 1977 Filters and Control. Linguistic Inquiry 8:425–504.Google Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen 1985 Clitic Doubling and Relative Clause Formation, in Romanian and Spanish. Mimeo. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Everett, Dan L. 1985 Pirahã Clitic Doubling and the Parametrization of Nominal Clitics. Mimeo. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.Google Scholar
Huang, Cheng-Teh James 1982 Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Huang, Cheng-Teh James 1984 On the Distribution and Reference of Empty Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15:531–574.Google Scholar
Hurtado, Alfredo 1986 Clitic Chains. In Linguistic Theory and Spanish Syntax. Hurtado, Alfredo, ed. Dordrecht: Reidel. [In press.]Google Scholar
Jaeggli, Osvaldo A. 1981 A Modular Approach to Passives. Coyote Working Papers in Linguistics 2:41–59.Google Scholar
Jaeggli, Osvaldo A. 1982 Topics in Romance Syntax Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Kayne, ichard S. 1975 French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Keach, Camelia 1980 The Syntax and Interpretation of the Relative Clause Construction in Swahili. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Laurendeau, Paul, Néron, Martine et Fournier, Robert 1982 Contraints sur l’emploi du Pro-Echo en français du Québec. Revue de l’Association Québécoise de Linguistique 1:115–128.Google Scholar
Lobeck, Anne, and Roberge, Yves 1985 Verb Raising, Coordination and Subject Clitics. Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
McCloskey, James, and Hale, Kenneth 1984 On the Syntax of Person-Number Inflection in Modern Irish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1:487–533.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David 1971 Deep and Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi 1982 Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Roberge, Yves 1984 Remarks on Preverbal and Postverbal Clitics in French. Paper presented at WECOL 14.Google Scholar
Roberge, Yves 1985 On Doubling and Null Argument Languages. NELS 16 [To appear.] Dept. of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Roberge, Yves 1986 The Syntactic Recoverability of Null Arguments. Ph.D. dissertation, UBC. [In progress].Google Scholar
Safir, Kenneth 1981 Inflection-Government and Inversion. The Linguistic Review 1:417–467.Google Scholar
Safir, Kenneth 1982 Syntactic Chains and the Definiteness Effect. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Sportiche, Dominique 1983 Structural Invariance and Symmetry in Syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Taraldsen, K. Tarald 1978 On the NIC, Vacuous Application and that-t Filter. Mimeo. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Torrego, Esther 1984 On Inversion and Some of Its Effects. Linguistic Inquiry 15:103–129.Google Scholar