Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T23:03:22.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Structure, use, and syntactic ecology in language obsolescence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2017

David Adger
David Adger*
Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Nancy Dorian's foundational work on the loss of Gaelic in the East Sutherland communities continues to provide important insights into the nature of the process of language change in situations of obsolescence. In this article I look at a subset of Dorian's data from the perspective of current syntactic theory, and argue that the connected loss of such apparently different constructions as objects of non-finite verbs, inalienable possessive structures, and a range of passives, and the concomitant restructuring of the grammar, all follow from the interaction between a reduction in agreement features on a functional head and the broad syntactic ecology of the language. This approach makes sense of why these apparently disparate constructions all undergo the particular kinds of change that are seen, changes which are mysterious from the perspective that an obsolescing language should alter to become more like the dominant language (in this case English) which is replacing it.

Résumé

Le travail fondamental de Nancy Dorian sur la perte du gaélique dans les communautés de East Sutherland continue de fournir des informations importantes sur la nature du processus de changement linguistique dans les situations d'obsolescence. Dans cet article, j'examine un sous-ensemble des données de Dorian à la lumière de la théorie syntaxique actuelle et soutiens que la perte connexe de constructions pourtant différentes, comme les objets de verbes non tensés, les structures possessives inaliénables et une gamme de constructions passives, et la restructuration concomitante de la grammaire, découlent de l'interaction entre une réduction des caractéristiques d'accord sur une tête fonctionnelle et l’écologie syntaxique de la langue de manière plus générale. Cette approche permet de comprendre pourquoi ces constructions en apparence hétérogènes subissent toutes les changements particuliers qui ont été observés, et qui paraissent mystérieux si l'on croit qu'une langue en voie d'obsolescence devrait changer de manière à ressembler davantage à la langue dominante (ici l'anglais), qui est en train de la remplacer.

Keywords

AgreementLanguage ObsolescenceScottish Gaelicsyntaxsociolinguisticsl'accord grammaticall'obsolescence linguistiquele gaélique écossaisla syntaxela sociolinguistique
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 62 , Issue 4: Variation at the Crossroads: Advancing theory by integrating methods/La Variation: Faire progresser la théorie par l'intégration des méthodes , December 2017 , pp. 614 - 638
Copyright
© Canadian Linguistic Association/Association canadienne de linguistique 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

A version of this article was presented at the Queen Mary Linguistics Department's Linglunch on 7th October 2015. Many thanks to all the participants for their comments and questions. Especial thanks to Devyani Sharma for very speedy comments on a rather drafty draft. Many thanks also to the audience of NWAV 44 at the University of Toronto for comments and feedback, to two anonymous reviewers for the Canadian Journal of Linguistics, and to the editors of this issue.

References

Adger, David. 2000. VSO clause structure and morphological feature checking. In Syntactic categories, ed. Borsley, Robert, 79–100. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adger, David. 2010. The syntax of Scottish Gaelic. In The Edinburgh Companion to the Scottish Gaelic language, ed. Watson, Moray and MacLeod, Michele, 304–349. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adger, David. 2013. A syntax of substance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Barker, Chris. 1995. Possessive descriptions. Stanford University: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Dorian, Nancy. 1973. Grammatical change in a dying dialect. Language 49(2): 413–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorian, Nancy. 1978. East Sutherland Gaelic. Dublin: Dublin Institue for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
Dorian, Nancy. 1981. Language death: The life cycle of a Scottish Gaelic dialect. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Dorian, Nancy. 1989. Introduction. In Investigating obsolescence: Studies in language contraction and death, ed. Dorian, Nancy, 1–10. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth L. and McCloskey, James. 1984. On the syntax of person-number inflection in Modern Irish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1(4): 487–533.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 1989. Facets of Romance past participle agreement. In Dialect variation and the theory of grammar, ed. Benincà, Paola, 85–104. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noyer, Rolf. 1992. Features, positions and affixes in autonomous morphological structure . Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, Carmen. 1994. Language contact and change: Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Winford, Donald. 1993. Predication in Caribbean English creoles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Charles. 2005. On productivity. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 5: 333–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar