Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T13:48:19.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Squishing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

John Robert Ross*
Affiliation:
Language Research Foundation and MIT

Extract

There are two arguments for postulating the existence of a rule which derives (some) plurals from conjoined singulars. This rule would convert (1a) to (1b).

(1) a. *The mani and the manj are different.

b. The meni,j are different.

The first argument derives from French agreement. Adjectives agree across the copula in number and gender with their subjects.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Lakoff, George (1970) Irregularity in Syntax, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, N.Y. Google Scholar
Postal, Paul M. (1970a) “On the surface verb remind ,” Linguistic Inquiry, Vol. 1, No. 1.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul M. (1970b) Crossover Phenomena, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, New York.Google Scholar
Ross, John Robert (1967) “Constraints on Variables in Syntax,” M.I.T. dissertation.Google Scholar