Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T14:00:57.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Possessor Raising in Nuu-chah-nulth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Christine Ravinski
Christine Ravinski*
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Nuu-chah-nulth possessor raising is semantically unrestricted and affects only subjects: subject agreement matches the person and number of the possessor (rather than the possessed subject), and the possessive-marking clitic attaches to the head of the clause (rather than to the possessum). Nuu-chah-nulth possessor raising is analyzed as a syntactic dependency between the possessive clitic in the main clause and the base-generated possessor position within DP. A Possessive Phrase can appear in either the DP or the clausal domain, and the possessive clitic may be generated in either position. When the possessive clitic is generated in the main clause, a possessor may raise out of subject position via feature-driven movement; the Minimal Link Condition prevents such movement from occurring out of object position.

Résumé

Résumé

En nuu-chah-nulth, le déplacement du possesseur n’est pas sujet à des contraintes sémantiques et peut seulement cibler la position de sujet. L’accord sujet (en personne et en nombre) s’effectue avec le possesseur (plutôt que le sujet possédé) et le clitique possessif s’attache à la tête de la phrase (plutôt que sur le possessum). Le déplacement du possesseur en nuu-chah-nulth est ici analysé comme une dépendance syntaxique entre le clitique possessif dans la phrase matrice et la position de possesseur à l’intérieur du syntagme déterminant (SD). Un Syntagme Possessif peut apparaître soit dans le SD ou dans le domaine de la phrase matrice et le clitique possessif peut être généré dans l’une ou l’autre de ces deux positions. Lorsque le clitique possessif est engendré dans la phrase matrice, un possesseur peut se déplacer depuis la position sujet via le mouvement légitimé par la vérification de traits; la condition sur le lien minimal empêche par ailleurs que l’origine de ce mouvement soit la position d’objet.

Type
Part III: Morpho-Syntactic and Syntactic Properties
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 52 , Issue 1-2: Southern Wakashan Languages , July 2007 , pp. 167 - 184
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bessell, Nicola J. 1992. Multiple case assignment: Muskogean possessor raising. Revised version. Generals paper, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, Ben. 2003. Syntactic approaches to possessive constructions in Nuuchahnulth. In University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics 11 : Papers for ICSNL XXXVIII, the 38th International Conference on Salish and Neighbouring Languages, ed. Brown, J.C. and Kalmar, Michele, 7–22.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1980. On extraction from NP in Italian. Journal of Italian Linguistics 5:47–99.Google Scholar
Davidson, Matthew. 2002. Studies in Southern Wakashan (Nootkan) grammar. Doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar
Davis, Henry, and Sawai, Naomi. 2001. Wh-movement as noun incorporation in Nuu-chah-nulth. In WCCFL 20: Proceedings of the 20th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. Megerdoomian, Karine and Bar-el, Leora Anne, 123–136. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Henry, Waldie, Ryan, and Wojdak, Rachel. This volume.Google Scholar
Emanatian, Michele. 1988. The Nootka passive revisited. In In honor of Mary Haas, ed. Shipley, William, 265–291. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, William H. Jr., 1973. The pattern of Makah pronouns. Paper read at the 8th International Conference on Salish Languages, Eugene, OR.Google Scholar
Klokeid, Terry J. 1978. Syntactic and conceptual relations in Nitinat. In Papers for the 12th International Conference on Salishan Languages, 1–68. Colville, WA: Colville Federated Tribes.Google Scholar
Landau, Idan. 1999. Possessor raising and the structure of VP. Lingua 107:1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1991. Extraction from NP and the proper notion of head government. In The syntax of noun phrases, ed. Giorgi, Alessandra and Longobardi, Giuseppe, 57–112. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McGregor, William. 1999. External possession constructions in Nyulnyulan languages. In External possession, ed. Payne, Doris L. and Barshi, Immanuel, 429–448. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, Pamela. 1999. Chickasaw subjecthood. In External possession, ed. Payne, Doris L. and Barshi, Immanuel, 251–289. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, Yumiko. 1996. The syntax of possessor raising. Master’s thesis, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Nakayama, Toshihide. 2001. Nuuchahnulth (Nootka) morphosyntax. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ravinski, Christine. 2005. Grammatical possesion in Nuu-chah-nulth. Master’s thesis, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Rose, Suzanne M. 1981. Kyuquot grammar. Doctoral dissertation, University of Victoria.Google Scholar
Rose, Suzanne M., and Carlson, Barry. 1984. The Nootka-Nitinaht passive. Anthropological Linguistics 26:1–12.Google Scholar
Tomioka, Satoshi, and Sim, Chang-Yong. 2004. The event root of inalienable possession. Paper read at Linguistics colloquium series, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Ura, Hiroyuki. 1996. Multiple feature checking: A theory of grammatical function splitting. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Whistler, Kenneth W. 1985. Focus, perspective, and inverse person marking in Nootkan. In Grammar inside and outside the clause: Some approaches to theory from the field, ed. Nichols, Johanna and Woodbury, Anthony C., 222–265. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wojdak, Rachel. 2004. On the classification of Wakashan lexical suffixes. In Proceedings of the 30th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: Special session on morphology of Native American languages, ed. Ettlinger, Marc, Fleisher, Nicholas, and Park-Doob, Mischa, 139–150. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Wojdak, Rachel. 2005. The linearization of affixes: Evidence from Nuu-chah-nulth. Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar