Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:07:32.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Paraplasm of English Grammars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

J. K. Chambers*
Affiliation:
Centre for Linguistic Studies University of Toronto

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews/Comptes rendus
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bach, Emmon (1970), “Problominalization,” Linguistic Inquiry 1: 12122.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan (1970), “An Argument against Pronominalization,” Linguistic Inquiry 1: 12223.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1957), Syntactic Structures, Mouton & Co.: The Hague.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1965), Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris (1968), The Sound Pattern of English, Harper & Row:N.Y. Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. (1966), “A Proposal concerning English Prepositions,” Georgetown Monograph Series in Language and Linguistics 19: 2033.Google Scholar
Fries, Charles C. (1952), The Structure of English, Harcourt, Brace & Co.: N.Y.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Roderick A., and Rosenbaum, Peter S. (1969), An Introduction to Transformational Grammar; Grammars 1 and 2. Ginn & Co.: Waltham, Mass.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Roderick A., and Rosenbaum, Peter S. (1970), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Ginn & Co.: Waltham, Mass.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J., & Postal, Paul M. (1964), An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions, MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J., & Postal, Paul M. & Fodor, Jerry A. (1963), “The Structure of a Semantic Theory,” in The Structure of Language (Fodor, & Katz, , eds.), Prentice-Hall: N.J., 1964: 479518.Google Scholar
Klima, Edward S. (1959), “Negation in English,” in The Structure of Language (Fodor, & Katz, , eds.), Prentice-Hall: N.J., 1964: 246323.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin T. (1968), Abstract Syntax and Latin Complementation, MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. (1968), “On Pronominalization and the Chain of Command,” in Modern Studies in English (Reibel, & Schane, , eds.), Prentice-Hall: N.J., 16086.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul M. (1964), “Underlying and Superficial Linguistic Structure,” Harvard Educational Review 34: 24666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postal, Paul M. (1966), “On so-called Pronouns in English,” Georgetown Monograph on Languages and Linguistics 19.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, Peter S. (1967a), The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions, MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, Peter S. (1967b), “English Grammar II,” in Specification and Utilization of a Transformational Grammar, Scientific Report 2, IBM Corp.: Yorkton Heights N.Y.Google Scholar
Ross, John Robert (1969), “Auxiliaries as Main Verbs,” Studies in Philosophical Linguistics 1: 77102.Google Scholar
Sledd, James (1959), A Short Introduction to English Grammar, Scott, Foresman & Co.: Chicago.Google Scholar
Strang, Barbara M. H. (1962), Modern English Structure, Edward Arnold Ltd.: London.Google Scholar