Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:15:01.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the role of person features in the evidential-temporal connection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2019

Roumyana Pancheva  and
Maria Luisa Zubizarreta
Roumyana Pancheva
Affiliation:
University of Southern California
Maria Luisa Zubizarreta*
Affiliation:
University of Southern California
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present article argues that temporality can be computed indirectly via evidentiality, and that this is the case for Paraguayan Guaraní, a tenseless language. To model the evidential–temporal connection, we employ features from the domains of person (author, participant) and general deixis (proximate, distal). We discuss in detail the case of two evidential morphemes: indirect evidential ra'e and reportative raka'e. We argue that these particles do not have temporal semantics; rather their temporal contribution is due to the interaction of person features that determine the type of evidentiality and deictic features incorporated into the person system.

Résumé

Le présent article défend l'idée que la temporalité peut être calculée indirectement par le biais de l’évidentialité, ce qui est le cas en guaraní paraguayen, une langue sans temps grammatical. Pour modéliser la connexion temporelle–évidentielle, nous utilisons des traits tirés des domaines de la personne (auteur, participant) et de la deixis générale (proximal, distal). Nous discutons en détail du cas de deux morphèmes évidentiels : ra'e (indirect) et raka'e (reportatif). Nous soutenons que ces éléments n'ont pas de sémantique temporelle; leur contribution temporelle est plutôt due à l'interaction des traits de personne qui déterminent le genre de traits d’évidentialité et de deixis intégrés au système de personne.

Keywords

Evidentialitytemporalityperson/deictic featuresattitude contextsGuaraníÉvidentialitétemporalitétraits de personne et de déixiscontextes d'attitudeguaraní
Type
Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 64 , Issue 4 , December 2019 , pp. 673 - 708
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association/Association canadienne de linguistique 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The fieldwork on which this article is based was supported by a USC grant to M.L. Zubizarreta. Various versions of this work were presented at Congreso de Gramática Generativa 27 (Alcalá de Henares, Spain, 2017), VI Congreso Internacional de Estudios Linguísticos (Brasilia, 2017), The Manitoba Workshop on Person (Winnipeg, 2017), The Princeton Symposium on Syntactic Theory (Princeton, 2018), VIII Encuentro de Gramática Generativa (Buenos Aires, 2018), University of Arizona Linguistics Colloquium (Tucson, 2019), The Alphabet of Grammar Workshop (British Academy, July 2019). We thank the participants, as well as the two anonymous reviewers, and the guest editors of this issue for their help and comments. Authors are listed alphabetically; no primacy of authorship is intended.

References

Ackema, Peter, and Neeleman, Ad. 2013. Person features and syncretism. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 31(4): 901–950.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2018. The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arregui, Ana, Rivero, María Luisa, and Salanova, Andrés Pablo. (2017). Aspect and tense in evidentials. In Modality across syntactic categories, ed. Arregui, Ana, Rivero, María Luisa and Salanova, Andrés Pablo, 211–234. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ayala, José Valentín. 1996. Gramatica Guarani [Guarani grammar]. Republica Argentina: Edición del Ministerio de Educación de la Nación.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina. 2003. On finiteness as logophoric anchoring. In Temps et point de vue / Tense and point of view, ed. Guéron, Jacqueline and Tasmowski, Liliane, 213–246. Nanterre: Université Paris X.Google Scholar
Bliss, Heather. 2005. Formalizing point-of-view: The role of sentience in Blackfoot's direct/inverse system. MA thesis, University of Calgary.Google Scholar
Bliss, Heather. 2013. The Blackfoot Configurationality Conspiracy: Parallels and differences in clausal and nominal patterns. Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Carol, Javier, and Avellana, Alicia. 2019. Tiempo, evidencialidad y miratividad en guaraní paraguayo y español de contacto [Time, evidentiality and mirativity in Paraguayan Guaraní and Contact Spanish]. Verba (46).Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace, and Nichols, Joanna. 1986. Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chung, Kyung-Sook. 2007. Spatial deictic tense and evidentials in Korean. Natural Language Semantics. 15(3): 187–219.Google Scholar
De Haan, Ferdinand. 2005. Encoding speaker perspective: Evidentials. In Linguistic Diversity and Language Theories, ed. Frajzyngier, Zygmunt, Hodges, Adam, and Rood, David S., 379–397. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 1981. An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns. Language 57(3): 626–657.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 1997. Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1(1), 33–52.Google Scholar
Diti, Bhadra. 2017. Evidentiality and Questions: Bangla at the Interfaces. Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Faller, Martina. 2002. Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Faller, Martina. 2004. The deictic core of “non-experienced past’ in Cuzco Quechua. Journal of Semantics 21(1):45–85.Google Scholar
Faller, Martina. 2011. A possible worlds semantics for Cuzco Quechua evidentials. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 20: 660–683, ed. Nan Li and David Lutz. Linguistic Society of America, <https://journals.linguisticsociety.org/proceedings/index.php/SALT/issue/view/108>>Google Scholar
Fleck, David. 2007. Evidentiality and double tenses in Matses. Language 83(3): 589–614.Google Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra. 2010. About the speaker: Towards a syntax of indexicality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene. 2008. Features on bound pronouns. In Phi Theory: Phi-Features Across Modules and Interfaces, ed. Harbour, Daniel, Adger, David, and Bejar, Susana, 35–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Izvorski, Roumyana. 1997. The present perfect as an epistemic modal. In Proceedings of SALT VII, ed. Lawson, Aaron, 222–239. Washington: Linguistic Society of America. <https://journals.linguisticsociety.org/proceedings/index.php/SALT/issue/view/102?>>Google Scholar
Kallfell, Guido. 2016. Como hablan los paraguayos con dos lenguas? Gramática del jopara [How do Paraguayans with two languages speak? Grammar of Jopara]. Biblioteca Digital Curt Nimuendajú <http://www.etnolinguistica.org/biblio:kallfell-2016-jopara>..>Google Scholar
Korotkova, Natasha. 2016. Heterogeneity and uniformity in the evidential domain. Doctoral dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 2013. Modality and the Semantics of Embedding. Amsterdam Colloquium.Google Scholar
Koev, Todor. 2017. Evidentiality, learning events and spatiotemporal distance: The view from Bulgarian. Journal of Semantics 34(1): 1–41.Google Scholar
Landau, Idan. 2015. A two-tiered theory of control. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Jungmee. 2013. Temporal constraints on the meaning of evidentiality. Natural Language Semantics 21(1): 1–41.Google Scholar
Lim, Dongsik. 2011. Evidentials in interrogatives: A case study of Korean. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 15, ed. Reich, Ingo, Horch, Eva, and Pauly, Dennis, 419–433. Saarbrücken: Saarland University Press.Google Scholar
Matthewson, Lisa, Davis, Henry, and Rullmann, Hotze. 2007. Evidentials as epistemic modals: Evidence from St’át'imcets. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 7: 201–254.Google Scholar
Murray, Sarah E. 2010. Evidentials and questions in Cheyenne. In Proceedings of SULA 5: Semantics of Under-Represented Languages in the Americas, ed. Lima, Suzi, 139–155. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.Google Scholar
Nevins., Andrew. 2007. The representation of third person and its consequences for person–case effects. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25(2): 273–313.Google Scholar
Norcliffe, Elizabeth. 2018. Egophoricity and evidentiality in Gumbiano (Nam Trik). In Egophoricity, ed. Floyd, Simeon, Norcliffe, Elizabeth, and Roque, Lila San, 305–346. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Özyildizi, Deniz. 2016. Knowledge report without truth. In Proceedings of ESSLLI 2016 Student Session, ed. Köllner, Marisa and Ziai, Ramon, 184–195. Bozen-Bolzano: University of Bolzano. <https://esslli2016.unibz.it/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/esslli-stus-2016-proceedings.pdf>>Google Scholar
Peterson, Tyler. 2015. Grammatical evidentiality and the unprepared mind. In Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13(2): Expressing and describing surprise, ed. Agnès Celle and Laure Lansari, 314–352.Google Scholar
Ritter, Elizabeth, and Wiltschko, Martina. 2014. The Composition of INFL: An exploration of tense, tenseless languages, and tenseless constructions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 32(4): 1331–1386.Google Scholar
Roberts, Craige. 2002. Demonstratives as definites. In Information sharing: Reference and presupposition in language generation and interpretation, ed. van Deemter, Kees and Kibble, Rodger, 89–196. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Rullmann, Hotze, Matthewson, Lisa, and Davis, Henry. 2008. Modals as distributive indefinites. Natural Language Semantics 16(4): 317–357.Google Scholar
Salanova, Andrés, and Carol, Javier. 2017. The mirative evidential is neither surprise nor contradiction, but discovery. In NELS 47: Proceedings of the forty-seventh annual meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, ed. Lamont, Andrew and Tetzloff, Katerina, 63–76. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
San Roque, Lila, Floyd, Simeon, and Norcliffe, Elisabeth. 2017. Evidentiality and interrogativity. Lingua 186: 120–143.Google Scholar
Schlenker, Philippe. 1999. Propositional Attitudes and Indexicality. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Schlenker, Philippe. 2003. A plea for monsters. Linguistics and Philosophy 26(1): 29–120.Google Scholar
Schlenker, Philippe. 2004. Context of thought and content of utterance: A note on free indirect discourse and the historical present. Mind and Language 19(3): 259–358.Google Scholar
Şener, Nilufer. 2011. Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Turkish. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Smirnova, Anastasia. 2013. Evidentiality in Bulgarian: Temporality, epistemic modality, and information source. Journal of Semantics 30(4): 479–532.Google Scholar
Speas, Margaret. 2004. Evidentiality, logophoricity and the syntactic representation of pragmatic features. Lingua 114(3): 255–276.Google Scholar
Speas, Margaret. 2010. Evidentials as generalized functional heads. In Interface legibility at the Edge, ed. Sciullo, Anne-Marie Di, 127–150. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Speas, Margaret. 2018. Evidentiality and formal semantic theories. In The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality, ed. Aikhenvald, Alexandra, 286–311. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sudo, Yasutada. 2012. On the Semantics of Phi Features on Pronouns. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Thomas, Guillaume. 2014. Nominal tense and temporal implicatures: Evidence from Mbyá. Natural Language Semantics 22(4):357–412.Google Scholar
Tonhauser, Judith. 2006. The temporal semantics of noun phrases: Evidence from Guarani. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Tonhauser, Judith. 2011a. Temporal reference in Paraguayan Guaraní, a tenseless language. Linguistics and Philosophy 34(3): 257–303.Google Scholar
Tonhauser, Judith. 2011b. The Paraguayan Guaraní future marker –ta: Formal semantics and cross-linguistic comparison. In Tense Across Languages, ed. Musan, Renate and Rathert, Monika, 207–232. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tonhauser, Judith. 2014. Reportative evidentiality in Paraguayan Guaraní. In Proceedings of SULA 7, ed. Greene, Hannah, 189–204, Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Velázquez-Castillo, Maura. 2009. The place of evidentiality in Guaraní grammar. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Velázquez-Castillo, Maura. 2017. Deixis and perspective in Paraguayan Guaraní. In Guarani Linguistics in the 21st Century, ed. Estigarribia, Bruno and Pinta, Justin, 259–284. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Willett, Thomas. 1988. A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language 12(1): 51–97.Google Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina. 2014. The universal structure of categories: Towards a formal typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, María Luisa, and Pancheva, Roumyana. 2017. A formal characterization of person-based alignment. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 35(4): 1161–1204.Google Scholar