Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T10:41:53.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Sonority and Salience: A Reply to Nikièma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Marie-Hélène Côté
Marie-Hélène Côté*
Affiliation:
Université d’Ottawa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reply/Réplique
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 47 , Issue 1-2 , June 2002 , pp. 67 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anttila, Arto. 1997. Deriving variation from grammar. In Variation, change and phonological theory, ed. Hinskens, Frans, van Hout, Roeland, and Wetzeis, W. Leo, 35–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Auger, Julie. 2001. Phonological variation and Optimality Theory: Evidence from vowel-initial epenthesis in Vimeu Picard. Language Variation and Change 13:253–303.Google Scholar
Brousseau, Anne-Marie, and Nikièma, Emmanuel. 2001. Phonologie et morphologie du français. Saint-Laurent: Fides.Google Scholar
Clements, George N. 1990. The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In Between the grammar and physics of speech, ed. Kingston, John and Beekman, Mary E., 283–333. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Côté, Marie-Hélène. 1997. Phonetic salience and consonant cluster simplification. In PF: Papers at the interface, ed. Bruening, Benjamin, Kang, Yoonjung, and McGinnis, Martha, 229–262. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 29.Google Scholar
Côté, Marie-Hélène. 1998. Saillance phonétique et contraste dans la réduction des groupes consonantiques: le cas du français québécois. In Langues et grammaire II et III: Phonologie, ed. Sauzet, Patrick, 25–42. CNRS/Département des sciences du langage, Université Paris 8.Google Scholar
Côté, Marie-Hélène. 2000. Consonant cluster phonotactics: A perceptual approach. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce P. 2000. Gradient well-formedness in Optimality Theory. In Optimality Theory: Phonology, syntax, and acquisition, ed. Dekkers, Joost, van der Leeuw, Frank, and van de Weijer, Jeroen, 88–120. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, Joan B. 1976. An introduction to natural generative phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hume, Elizabeth V., and Johnson, Keith, eds. 2001. The role of speech perception phenomena in phonology. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Nikièma, Emmanuel. 1999. Government-licensing and consonant cluster simplification in Quebec French. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 44:327–357.Google Scholar
Parker, Stephen G. 2002. Quantifying the sonority hierarchy. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca. 1999. Phonetics in phonology: The case of laryngeal neutralization. In Papers in phonology 3, ed. Gordon, Matthew K., 25–246. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics 2.Google Scholar
Tranel, Bernard. 1981. Concreteness in generative phonology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar