Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:24:43.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neutral Vowels in Optimality Theory: A Comparison of Yoruba and Wolof

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Douglas Pulleyblank
Douglas Pulleyblank*
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Patterns of vowel harmony are frequently interrupted by the presence of neutral segments, segments that are obligatorily realised with only one of the harmonic values. Peripherally, neutral segments appear in two patterns, referred to as relative and absolute alignment. Medially, such neutral segments may be opaque, interrupting the transmission of harmony, or they may be transparent, skipped over by harmony. It is argued that the properties of neutrality result from the interaction of three independently motivated families of constraints: faithfulness, alignment, and grounding. No process-specific constraints distinguishing between the types of alignment or between opacity and transparency are required under the proposed account.

Résumé

Résumé

Les patrons d’harmonie vocalique sont fréquemment interrompus par la présence de segments neutres, segments qui sont obligatoirement réalisés avec une seule des valeurs harmoniques. En position périphérique, les segments neutres se présentent sous deux patrons : l’alignementrelatif ou absolu. En position médiale, de tels segments neutres peuvent être opaques, interrompant la transmission de l’harmonie, ou transparents, ne bloquant pas l’harmonie. Dans cet article, il est argumenté que les propriétés de neutralité découlent de l’interaction de trois familles de contraintes indépendamment justifiées: la fidélité (« faithfulness »), l’alignement («alignment»), et l’ancrage phonétique («grounding»). Cette analyse permet d’éviter de recourir à des contraintes spécifiques sur les processus pour distinguer entre les types d’alignement ou entre l’opacité et la transparence.

Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , December 1996 , pp. 295 - 347
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akinlabi, Akinbiyi. 1995. Featural affixation. In Theoretical approaches to African linguistics, ed. Akinlabi, Akinbiyi, 217–237. Lawrenceville: Africa World Press.Google Scholar
Akinlabi, Akinbiyi. 1996. Featural affixation. Journal of Linguistics 32:239–289.Google Scholar
Akinlabi, Akinbiyi. To appear. Kalabari vowel harmony. The Linguistic Review.Google Scholar
Akinlabi, Akinbiyi, and Oyebade, Francis. 1987. Lexical and postlexical rule application: Vowel deletion in Yoruba. Journal of West African Languages 17:23–42.Google Scholar
Archangeli, Diana, and Pulleyblank, Douglas. 1989. Yoruba vowel harmony. Linguistic Inquiry 20:173–217.Google Scholar
Archangeli, Diana, and Pulleyblank, Douglas. 1994a. Grounded phonology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Archangeli, Diana, and Pulleyblank, Douglas. 1994b. Kinande vowel harmony: Domains, grounded conditions, and one-sided alignment. Ms., University of Arizona and University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Awobuluyi, Ọladele. 1967. Vowel and consonant harmony in Yoruba. Journal of African Languages 6:1–8.Google Scholar
Bamgboṣe, Ayọ. 1967. Vowel harmony in Yoruba. Journal of African Languages 6:268–273.Google Scholar
Beckman, Jill. 1995. Shona height harmony: Markedness and positional identity. In University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18: Papers in Optimality Theory, ed. Beckman, Jill, Walsh, Laura, and Urbanczyk, Suzanne, 53–75. Graduate Linguistic Student Association, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Clements, George N. 1981. Akan vowel harmony: A nonlinear analysis. In Harvard Studies in Phonology 2, ed. Clements, George N., 108–177. Harvard University.Google Scholar
Cohn, Abigail C. 1990. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 76: Phonetic and phonological rules of nasalization. University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Cole, Jennifer S., and Kisseberth, Charles W.. 1994. An Optimal Domains theory of harmony. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 24:101–114.Google Scholar
Goad, Heather. 1993. On the configuration of height features. Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John. 1976. Autosegmental phonology. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John. 1990. Autosegmental and metrical phonology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hammond, Michael. 1988. On deriving the Well-Formedness Condition. Linguistic Inquiry 19:319–325.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1981. A metrical theory of stress rules. Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, Indiana.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1986a. Assimilation as spreading in Toba Batak. Linguistic Inquiry 17:467–499.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1986b. Inalterability in CV phonology. Language 62:321–351.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1990. Diphthongisation and coindexing. Phonology 7:31–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewitt, Mark. 1994. Deconstructing foot binarity in Koniag Alutiiq. Ms., University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 1987. Prosodic domains in Kukuya. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5:311–333.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 1995. Nasal consonant harmony at a distance: The case of Yaka. Studies in African Linguistics 24:5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itô, Junko. 1986. Syllable theory in prosodic phonology. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko, Mester, Armin, and Padgett, Jaye. 1995. Licensing and underspecification in Optimality Theory. Linguistic Inquiry 26:571–613.Google Scholar
Ka, Omar. 1988. Wolof phonology and morphology: A non-linear approach. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1985. Some consequences of lexical phonology. Phonology Yearbook 2:85–138.Google Scholar
Kirchner, Robert. 1993a. Turkish vowel disharmony in Optimality Theory. Paper presented at the Rutgers Optimality Workshop 1, New Brunswick, N.J. Google Scholar
Kirchner, Robert. 1993b. Optimizing Yidiny phonology. Ms., University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Liberman, Mark, and Prince, Alan. 1977. On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry 8:249–336.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 1983. Consonantal morphology in the Chaha verb. In Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 2, ed. Barlow, Michael, Flickinger, Daniel P., and Wescoat, Michael T., 176–188. Stanford Linguistics Association, Stanford University.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 1986. OCP effects: Gemination and antigemination. Linguistic Inquiry 17:207–264.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 1993. The parallel advantage: Containment, consistency, and alignment. Paper presented at the Rutgers Optimality Workshop 1, New Brunswick, N.J. Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J., and Prince, Alan. 1993a. Prosodic morphology I: Constraint interaction and satisfaction. Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst and Rutgers University.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J., and Prince, Alan. 1993b. Generalized alignment. In Yearbook of Morphology 1993, ed. Booij, Geert and Marle, Jaap van, 79–153. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J., and Prince, Alan. 1995. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18: Papers in Optimality Theory, ed. Beckman, Jill, Walsh, Laura, and Urbanczyk, Suzanne, 249–384. Graduate Linguistic Student Association, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Mester, Armin, and Padgett, Jaye. 1994. Directional syllabification in generalized alignment. In Phonology at Santa Cruz 3, ed. Merchant, Jason, Padgett, Jaye, and Walker, Rachel, 79–85. University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Myers, Scott. 1987. Tone and the structure of words in Shona. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Myers, Scott. 1995. OCP effects in Optimality Theory. Ms., University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
Myers, Scott. In Press. Perceptual constraints and neutralization: A direct approach. In Derivations and Constraints in Phonology, ed. Roca, Iggy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet, and Beckman, Mary. 1988. Japanese tone structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan, and Smolensky, Paul. 1993. Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Technical Report 2 of the Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science. Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Douglas. 1993. Vowel harmony and Optimality Theory. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Phonology, 1–18. Associação Portugesa de Linguística, University of Coimbra, Portugal.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Douglas, Jiang-King, Ping, Leitch, Myles, and Ọla., Ọlanikẹ In Press. Typological variation through constraint rankings: Low vowels in tongue root harmony. In Proceedings of the Arizona Phonology Conference: Workshop on Features in Optimality Theory. University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Douglas, and Turkel, William J.. 1996. Optimality Theory and learning algorithms: The representation of recurrent featural asymmetries. In Current Trends in Phonology 2: Models and Methods, ed. Durand, Jacques and Laks, Bernard, 653–684. Salford, Manchester: European Studies Research Institute, University of Salford.Google Scholar
Sagey, Elisabeth. 1986. On the ill-formedness of crossing association lines. Linguistic Inquiry 19:109–118.Google Scholar
Schein, Barry, and Steriade, Donca. 1986. On geminates. Linguistic Inquiry 17:691–744.Google Scholar
Smolensky, Paul. 1993. Harmony, markedness, and phonological activity. Paper presented at the Rutgers Optimality Workshop 1, New Brunswick, N.J. Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca. 1995. Underspecification and markedness. In The handbook of phonological theory, ed. Goldsmith, John, 114–174. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar